Theory of Mind Deficits following Acute Alcohol IntoxicationMitchell I.J. · Beck S.R. · Boyal A. · Edwards V.R.
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Acute alcohol consumption is associated with socially inappropriate behaviour. Such behaviour could in part reflect the potential of alcohol to interfere with social cognition. In this experiment we tested the hypothesis that acute alcohol consumption by regular heavy social drinking young adults would compromise an aspect of social cognition, namely theory of mind (understanding intentions, emotions and beliefs). Participants who had consumed 6–8 units of alcohol showed specific impairments on two theory of mind tests: identification of faux pas and emotion recognition. This result suggests that alcohol consumption could lead to social problems secondary to difficulties in interpreting the behaviour of others due to theory of mind impairments.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
Kershaw C, Budd T, Kinshott G, Mattison J, Mayhew P, Mayhill A: The 2000 British Crime Survey for England and Wales. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 2000;18:1–153.
- Honkanen R: Alcohol in home and leisure activities. Addiction 1993;88:939–944.
- Abbey A, Zawacki T, Buck PO, Clinton AM, McAuslan P: Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: what do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggress Violent Behav 2004;9:271–303.
- Thompson JC, Kao TC, Thomas RJ: The relationship between alcohol use and risk-taking sexual behaviors in a large behavioral study. Prev Med 2005;41:247–252.
Mitchell IJ, Rutherford V, Wrinch KAJ, Egan V: Paradoxical effects of alcohol intake in a convivial social setting on attitudes to violence. Addict Res Theory 2008;15:1–11.
- Giancola PR: Executive functioning: a conceptual framework for alcohol-related aggression. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000;8:576–597.
- Lyvers M: ‘Loss of control’ in alcoholism and drug addiction. A neuroscientific interpretation. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000;8:225–249.
Peterson JB, Rothfleisch J, Zelazo PD, Pihl RO: Acute Alcohol-Intoxication and Cognitive-Functioning. J Stud Alcohol 1990;51:114–122.
- Weissenborn R, Duka T: Acute alcohol effects on cognitive function in social drinkers: their relationship to drinking habits. Psychopharmacology 2003;165:306–312.
- George S, Rogers RD, Duka T: The acute effect of alcohol on decision making in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 2005;182:160–169.
- Apperly IA, Samson, Chiavarino C, Humphreys GW: Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contributions to theory of mind: neuropsychological evidence from a false-belief task with reduced language and executive demands. J Cogn Neurosci 2004;16:1773–1784.
- Perner J, Aichhorn M, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, Ladurner G: Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction. Soc Neurosci 2006;1:245–258.
- Aichhorn M, Perner J, Weiss B, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, Ladurner G: Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory of mind tasks: falseness, beliefs, or attention. J Cogn Neurosci 2009;21:1179–1192.
- Saxe R, Kanwisher N: People thinking about thinking people: the role of the temporoparietal junction in ‘theory of mind’. Neuroimage 2003;19:1835–1842.
- Gregory C, Lough S, Stone S, Erzinclioglu S, Martin L, Baron-Cohen S, Hodges JR: Theory of mind in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: theoretical and practical implications. Brain2002;125:752–764.
- Rowe AD, Bullock PR, Polkey CE, Morris RG: Theory of mind’ impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain 2001;124:600–616.
- Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT: Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 1998;10:640–656.
- Wimmer H, Perner J: Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 1983;13:103–128.
- Wellman HM, Cross D, Watson J: Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev 2001;72:655–684.
- Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I: The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:241–251.
- Back E, Ropar D, Mitchell P: Do the eyes have it? Inferring mental states from animated faces in autism. Child Dev 2007;78:397–411.
- Gill JS: Reported levels of alcohol consumption and binge drinking within the UK undergraduate student population over the last 25 years. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37:109–120.
- Tombaugh TN, Kozak J, Rees L: Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1999;14:167–177.
- Wendt PE, Risberg J: Ethanol reduces rCFB activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a verbal fluency task. Brain Lang 2001;77:197–215.
- Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Wheelwright S, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Simmons A, Williams SCR: Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci1999;11:1891–1898.
- Riggs KJ, Peterson DM, Robinson EJ, Mitchell P: Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader difficulty with counterfactuality? Cogn Dev 1998;13:73–90.
- Colder CR, Chassin L: Affectivity and impulsivity: temperament risk for adolescent alcohol involvement. Psychol Addict Behav 1997;11:83–97.
- Hoaken PNS, Shaughnessy VK, Pihl RO: Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: is it an issue of impulsivity? Aggress Behav 2003;29:15–30.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.