Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Full-Body Skin Mapping for Six Biophysical Parameters: Baseline Values at 16 Anatomical Sites in 125 Human Subjects

Kleesz P.a · Darlenski R.b · Fluhr J.W.c

Author affiliations

aGerman Social Accident Insurance Institution for the Foodstuffs and catering industry (BGN), Mannheim, Germany; bDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria; cDepartment of Dermatology, Center of Experimental Applied Cutaneous Physiology, Charité University Clinic, Berlin, Germany

Related Articles for ""

Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012;25:25–33

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: April 08, 2011
Accepted: June 17, 2011
Published online: September 07, 2011
Issue release date: December 2011

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 7
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1660-5527 (Print)
eISSN: 1660-5535 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/SPP

Abstract

Background/Aim: The skin, as the outermost organ, protects against exogenous hazards (outside-in barrier) and prevents the loss of essential parts of the body (inside-out barrier). The epidermal barrier exerts several functions with specific morphological elements. Regional differences in skin functions are well known. The aim of the present study was to assess and compare skin physiological parameters in vivo at 16 anatomical sites: Barrier function in terms of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration (assessed by capacitance), skin surface pH, skin surface temperature, erythema index and skin pigmentation were quantified at 16 anatomical sites under basal conditions. In addition, casual skin lipid level as a function of sebaceous lipids was measured on the forehead. Material and Methods: The 6 functions at the 16 anatomical sites were assessed in a cohort of 125 volunteers working in the food processing industry. These functions were quantified with noninvasive instruments, namely a Tewameter (barrier function), a Corneometer (SC hydration), a pH-meter, a Mexameter (erythema index and pigmentation), a skin surface thermometer and a Sebumeter (casual sebum level). Results: We identified ranges for the 16 anatomical locations for each instrument and some parameters could be classified into distinctive groups. Furthermore, a left-right comparison was performed at 3 sites (dorsal hand, ventral hand and ventral forearm). Certain side differences could be shown for SC hydration, surface pH, erythema index, melanin index and skin surface temperature in the 3 assessed areas. A left-to-right, statistically nonsignificant difference was also established for TEWL. Conclusion: The detected site-specific characteristics could be attributed to factors such as occlusion, different degrees of UV exposure, microcirculation and distribution of afferent and efferent nerve endings as well as fat distribution. External factors, such as life style, UV exposure and working conditions need to be taken into account. The present data are intended for an adequate selection of parameters and anatomical locations when assessing working conditions and designing clinical dermatological and pharmaceutical studies.

© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Berardesca E: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1995;3:126–132.
    External Resources
  2. Bircher A, de Boer EM, Agner T, Wahlberg JE, Serup J: Guidelines for measurement of cutaneous blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:65–72.
  3. Darlenski R, Sassning S, Tsankov N, Fluhr JW: Non-invasive in vivo methods for investigation of the skin barrier physical properties. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;72:295–303.
  4. Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A, Wilhelm KP, Takiwaki H, Serup J: Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:1–10.
  5. Parra JL, Paye M: EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin surface pH. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2003;16:188–202.
  6. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J: Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990;22:164–178.
  7. Rogiers V: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001;14:117–128.
  8. Menon GK, Kligman AM: Barrier functions of human skin: a holistic view. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:178–189.
  9. Wilhelm KP, Cua AB, Maibach HI: Skin aging. Effect on transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and casual sebum content. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1806–1809.
  10. Emtestam L, Ollmar S: Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:104–108.
  11. Plewig G: Regional differences of cell sizes in the human stratum corneum. II. Effects of sex and age. J Invest Dermatol 1970,54:19–23.
  12. Plewig G, Marples RR: Regional differences of cell sizes in the human stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 1970;54:13–18.
  13. Rougier A, Lotte C, Maibach HI: In vivo percutaneous penetration of some organic compounds related to anatomic site in humans: predictive assessment by the stripping method. J Pharm Sci 1987;76:451–454.
  14. Yosipovitch G, Maayan-Metzger A, Merlob P, Sirota L: Skin barrier properties in different body areas in neonates. Pediatrics 2000;106(1 Pt 1):105–108.
  15. Treffel P, Panisset F, Faivre B, Agache P: Hydration, transepidermal water loss, pH and skin surface parameters: correlations and variations between dominant and non-dominant forearms. Br J Dermatol 1994;130:325–328.
  16. Oestmann E, Lavrijsen AP, Hermans J, Ponec M: Skin barrier function in healthy volunteers as assessed by transepidermal water loss and vascular response to hexyl nicotinate: intra- and inter-individual variability. Br J Dermatol 1993;128:130–136.
  17. Schwindt DA, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI: Water diffusion characteristics of human stratum corneum at different anatomical sites in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 1998:111:385–389.
  18. Holbrook KA, Odland GF: Regional differences in the thickness (cell layers) of the human stratum corneum: an ultrastructural analysis. J Invest Dermatol 1974;62:415–422.
  19. Lampe MA, Burlingame AL, Whitney J, et al: Human stratum corneum lipids: characterization and regional variations. J Lipid Res 1983;24:120–130.
  20. Black D, Del Pozo A, Lagarde JM, Gall Y: Seasonal variability in the biophysical properties of stratum corneum from different anatomical sites. Skin Res Technol 2000;6:70–76.
  21. Hoeger PH, Enzmann CC: Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy. Pediatr Dermatol 2002;19:256–262.
  22. Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Munson KA, Pickens WL, Hoath SB: Changes in diapered and nondiapered infant skin over the first month of life. Pediatr Dermatol 2000;17:45–51.
  23. Giusti F, Martella A, Bertoni L, Seidenari S: Skin barrier, hydration, and pH of the skin of infants under 2 years of age. Pediatr Dermatol 2001;18:93–96.
  24. Rendell MS, Finnegan MF, Healy JC, et al: The relationship of laser-Doppler skin blood flow measurements to the cutaneous microvascular anatomy. Microvasc Res 1998;55:3–13.
  25. Kondo N, Takano S, Aoki K, Shibasaki M, Tominaga H, Inoue Y: Regional differences in the effect of exercise intensity on thermoregulatory sweating and cutaneous vasodilation. Acta Physiol Scand 1998;164:71–78.
  26. Pierard GE, Pierard-Franchimont C, Marks R, Paye M, Rogiers V: EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin greasiness. The EEMCO Group. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2000;13:372–389.
  27. Man MQ, Xin SJ, Song SP, et al: Variation of skin surface pH, sebum content and stratum corneum hydration with age and gender in a large Chinese population. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:190–199.
  28. Hachem JP: The two compartment model of the stratum corneum: biochemical aspects and pathophysiological implications. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg 2006;68:287–317.
  29. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI: Regional variation in percutaneous penetration of 14C cortisol in man. J Invest Dermatol 1967;48:181–183.
  30. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI: Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 1990;123:607–613.
  31. Hadgraft J, Lane ME: Transepidermal water loss and skin site: a hypothesis. Int J Pharm 2009;373:1–3.
  32. Rougier A, Dupuis D, Lotte C, Roguet R, Wester RC, Maibach HI: Regional variation in percutaneous absorption in man: measurement by the stripping method. Arch Dermatol Res 1098;278:465–469.
  33. Tagami H: Location-related differences in structure and function of the stratum corneum with special emphasis on those of the facial skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 2008;30:413–434.
  34. Huzaira M, Rius F, Rajadhyaksha M, Anderson RR, Gonzalez S: Topographic variations in normal skin, as viewed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 2001;116:846–852.
  35. Orsmark K, Wilson D, Maibach H: In vivo transepidermal water loss and epidermal occlusive hydration in newborn infants: anatomical region variation. Acta Derm Venereol 1980;60:403–407.
  36. Fluhr JW, Dickel H, Kuss O, Weyher I, Diepgen TL, Berardesca E: Impact of anatomical location on barrier recovery, surface pH and stratum corneum hydration after acute barrier disruption. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:770–776.
  37. van Neste D, de Brouwer B: Monitoring of skin response to sodium lauryl sulphate: clinical scores versus bioengineering methods. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:151–156.
  38. Conti A, Schiavi ME, Seidenari S: Capacitance, transepidermal water loss and causal level of sebum in healthy subjects in relation to site, sex and age. Int J Cosmet Sci 1995;17:77–85.
  39. Garcia Bartels N, Mleczko A, Schink T, Proquitte H, Wauer RR, Blume-Peytavi U: Influence of bathing or washing on skin barrier function in newborns during the first four weeks of life. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:248–257.
  40. Wiedersberg S, Leopold CS, Guy RH: Effects of various vehicles on skin hydration in vivo. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:128–130.
  41. Egawa M, Tagami H: Comparison of the depth profiles of water and water-binding substances in the stratum corneum determined in vivo by Raman spectroscopy between the cheek and volar forearm skin: effects of age, seasonal changes and artificial forced hydration. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:251–260.
  42. Jang WY, Park JJ, Jeong HJ, Kim HS, Park JC: Time series trend of the water content on the different human anatomical sites using single frequency-susceptance measuring method. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;1:3744–3746.
  43. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC: The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006;19:296–302.
  44. Pierard GE: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin colour. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998;10:1–11.
  45. Wa CV, Maibach HI: Mapping the human face: biophysical properties. Skin Res Technol 2010;16:38–54).
  46. Savastano DM, Gorbach AM, Eden HS, Brady SM, Reynolds JC, Yanovski JA: Adiposity and human regional body temperature. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:1124–1131.
  47. Zambreanu L, Wise RG, Brooks JC, Iannetti GD, Tracey I: A role for the brainstem in central sensitisation in humans. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Pain 2005;114:397–407.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: April 08, 2011
Accepted: June 17, 2011
Published online: September 07, 2011
Issue release date: December 2011

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 7
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1660-5527 (Print)
eISSN: 1660-5535 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/SPP


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.