Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Systematic Review

Free Access

Prevalence of Apolipoprotein E4 Genotype and Homozygotes (APOE e4/4) among Patients Diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ward A.a · Crean S.a · Mercaldi C.J.b · Collins J.M.a · Boyd D.a · Cook M.N.c · Arrighi H.M.d

Author affiliations

aCenter for Epidemiology and Database Analytics, United BioSource Corporation, Lexington, Mass., bCenter for Epidemiology and Database Analytics, United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, Md., cPfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pa., and dJANSSEN Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research and Development, LLC, South San Francisco, Calif., USA

Corresponding Author

Alex Ward, PhD, MRPharmS

United BioSource Corporation

430 Bedford St., Suite 300

Lexington, MA 02420 (USA)

Tel. +1 781 960 0227, E-Mail alex.ward@unitedbiosource.com

Related Articles for ""

Neuroepidemiology 2012;38:1–17

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Abstract

Background: Population allele frequencies of apolipoprotein E (APOE) vary by geographic region. The purpose of this study is to summarize and evaluate published estimates for the prevalence of APOE e4 carrier status among the population diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by geographic region and country. Methods: A systematic review of English-language publications from January 1, 1985, through May 31, 2010, was conducted. Studies reporting APOE e4 status for patients diagnosed with AD were included in the analysis; trials and autopsies were excluded. APOE e4 data were pooled, and prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Pooled estimates for APOE e4 carrier prevalence data were derived from 142 independent samples: 48.7% (95% CI: 46.5–51.0), and from 73 samples for e4/4 (homozygotes): 9.6% (95% CI: 8.4–10.8). The highest estimates were in Northern Europe: 61.3% (95% CI: 55.9–66.7), e4/4 prevalence: 14.1% (95% CI: 12.2–16.0). The lowest estimates were in Asia and Southern Europe. Substantial heterogeneity of these prevalence estimates was observed. Conclusions: APOE e4 genotype prevalence varies among AD patients by region and within each country. Further exploration is warranted to better understand the substantial heterogeneity of these prevalence estimates.

© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Lobo A, Launer LJ, Fratiglioni L, Andersen K, Di Carlo A, Breteler MM, Copeland JR, Dartigues JF, Jagger C, Martinez-Lage J, Soininen H, Hofman A: Prevalence of dementia and major subtypes in Europe: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in the Elderly Research Group. Neurology 2000;54:S4–S9.
  2. Davidson Y, Gibbons L, Pritchard A, Hardicre J, Wren J, Stopford C, Julien C, Thompson J, Payton A, Pickering-Brown SM, Pendleton N, Horan MA, Burns A, Purandare N, Lendon CL, Neary D, Snowden JS, Mann DM: Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele frequency and age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2007;23:60–66.
  3. Roses AD: On the discovery of the genetic association of apolipoprotein E genotypes and common late-onset Alzheimer disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2006;9:361–366.
  4. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, Haines JL, Hyman B, Kukull WA, Mayeux R, Myers RH, Pericak-Vance MA, Risch N, van Duijn CM: Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer disease meta analysis consortium. JAMA 1997;278:1349–1356.
  5. Bettens K, Sleegers K, Van Broeckhoven C: Current status on Alzheimer disease molecular genetics: from past, to present, to future. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:R4–R11.
  6. Corbo RM, Scacchi R: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele distribution in the world. Is APOE*4 a ‘thrifty’ allele? Ann Hum Genet 1999;63:301–310.
  7. Eichner JE, Dunn ST, Perveen G, Thompson DM, Stewart KE, Stroehla BC: Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and cardiovascular disease: a huge review. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:487–495.
  8. Singh PP, Singh M, Mastana SS: APOE distribution in world populations with new data from India and the UK. Ann Hum Biol 2006;33:279–308.
  9. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.
  10. Hedges L, Olkin I: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, Academic Press, 1985.
  11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–560.
  12. Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Colditz GA: A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med 1995;14:395–411.
  13. Tsuang D, Kukull W, Sheppard L, Barnhart RL, Peskind E, Edland SD, Schellenberg G, Raskind M, Larson EB: Impact of sample selection on APOE epsilon 4 allele frequency: a comparison of two Alzheimer’s disease samples. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:704–707.
  14. Crean S, Ward A, Mercaldi CJ, Collins JM, Cook MN, Baker NL, Arrighi HM: Apolipoprotein E e4 prevalence in Alzheimer’s disease patients varies across global populations: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2011;31:20–30.
  15. Bowirrat A, Oscar-Berman M, Logroscino G: Association of depression with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in an elderly Arab population of Wadi-Ara, Israel. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;21:246–251.
  16. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Dekosky ST, Barberger-Gateau P, Cummings J, Delacourte A, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Jicha G, Meguro K, O’Brien J, Pasquier F, Robert P, Rossor M, Salloway S, Stern Y, Visser PJ, Scheltens P: Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:734–746.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Systematic Review

Received: November 23, 2010
Accepted: October 19, 2011
Published online: December 17, 2011
Issue release date: January 2012

Number of Print Pages: 17
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 7

ISSN: 0251-5350 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0208 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NED


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.