Background: Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is a degenerative disease characterized by progressive visual agnosia with posterior cerebral atrophy. We examine the role of the picture naming test and make a number of suggestions with regard to diagnosing PCA as atypical dementia. Methods: We investigated 3 cases of early-stage PCA with 7 control cases of Alzheimer disease (AD). The patients and controls underwent a naming test with real objects and colored photographs of familiar objects. We then compared rates of correct answers. Results: Patients with early-stage PCA showed significant inability to recognize photographs compared to real objects (F = 196.284, p = 0.0000) as measured by analysis of variants. This difficulty was also significant to AD controls (F = 58.717, p = 0.0000). Conclusion: Picture agnosia is a characteristic symptom of early-stage PCA, and the picture naming test is useful for the diagnosis of PCA as atypical dementia at an early stage.

1.
Tang-Wai DF, Graff-Radford NR: Looking into posterior cortical atrophy: providing insight into Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2011;76:1778–1779.
2.
Cogan DG: Visual disturbances with focal progressive dementing disease. Amer J Ophthalmol 1985;100:68–72.
3.
DeRenzi E: Slowly progressive visual agnosia or apraxia without dementia. Cortex 1986;22:171–180.
4.
Benson DF, Davis RJ, Snyder BD: Posterior cortical atrophy. Arch Neurol 1988;45:789–793.
5.
Rubins AB: Agnosia; in Heilman KM and Valenstein E (eds): Clinical Neuropsychology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1979, p 233.
6.
Yamadori A, Osumi Y, Fujisada H: Picture agnosia without alexia, visuospatial agnosia or object agnosia [in Japanese]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1985;25:744–750.
7.
McMonagle P, Deering F, Berliner Y, Kertesz A: The cognitive profile of posterior cortical atrophy. Neurology 2006;66:331–338.
8.
Migliaccio R, Agosta F, Rascovsky K, Karydas A, Bonasera S, Rabinovici GD, Miller BL, Gorno-Tempini ML: Clinical syndromes associated with posterior atrophy: early age at onset AD spectrum. Neurology 2009;73:1571–1578.
9.
Midorikawa A, Nakamura K, Nagao T, Kawamura M: Residual perception of moving objects: dissociation of moving and static objects in a case of posterior cortical atrophy. Eur Neurol 2008;59:152–158.
10.
Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al: Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:734–746.
11.
Japan Society for Higher Brain Dysfunction: Visual Perception Test for Agnosia [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Shinkoh Igaku Shuppan, 1998.
12.
Lissauer H: Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit, nebst einem Beitrag zur Theorie derselben. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 1890;21:222–270.
13.
Chainay H, Humphreys GW: The real-object advantage in agnosia: evidence for a role of surface and depth information in object recognition. Cogn Neuropsychol 2001;18:175–191.
14.
Humphrey GK, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Servos P: The role of surface information in object recognition: studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 1994;23:1457–1481.
15.
Tsutsui K, Sakata H, Naganuma T, Taira M: Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science 2002;298: 409–412.
16.
Rosenbloom MH, Alkalay A, Agarwal N, Baker SL, O’Neil JP, Janabi M, Yen IV, Growdon M, Jang J, Madison C, Mormino EC, Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Weiner MW, Miller BL, Jagust WJ, Rabinovici GD: Distinct clinical and metabolic deficits in PCA and AD are not related to amyloid distribution. Neurology 2011;76:1789–1796.
17.
Seguin J, Formaglio M, Perret-Liaudet A, Quadrio I, Tholance Y, Rouaud O, Thomas-Anterion C, Croisile B, Mollion H, Moreaud O, Salzmann M, Dorey A, Bataillard M, Coste MH, Vighetto A, Krolak-Salmon P: CSF biomarkers in posterior cortical atrophy. Neurology 2011;76:1782–1788.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.