Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Frozen Section Analyses That Are Negative for TumorsLee S.K.a · Lee K.W.a · Kim S.a · Choi M.-Y.a · Kim J.a · Lee J.a · Jung S.P.a · Choe J.-H.a · Kim J.-H.a · Kim J.S.a · Lee J.E.a · Yang J.-H.b · Nam S.J.a
aDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, and bDepartment of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Objectives: This study was designed to assess the necessity of delayed complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) for patients whose sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were negative for tumors on intraoperative frozen section analysis, but later proven positive on hematoxylin and eosin staining or immunohistochemistry. Methods: We identified 341 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with cALND at the Samsung Medical Center between 1998 and 2008, and reviewed the clinicopathological records of women diagnosed with invasive carcinoma of the breast. Results: Of the 341 patients, 59 underwent delayed cALND due to negative results on frozen section. Only 1 patient had a non-SLNs metastasis in the group of delayed cALND. Delayed cALND was associated with higher rates of breast-conserving surgery, smaller primary tumor and metastasis size in SLNs, fewer metastatic lymph nodes and SLNs and a lower TNM stage. The detection of metastases of SLNs on frozen section and the number of metastatic SLNs were related to the detection of additional metastases of nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) in cALND. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the lack of detection of metastases on frozen sections may be a predictive factor for nonmetastasis in NSLNs. cALND could therefore be omitted in such cases.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.