Audiology and Neurotology

Original Paper

Comprehensive Analysis of Head-Shaking Nystagmus in Patients with Vestibular Neuritis

Lee Y.J.a · Shin J.E.a · Park M.S.a · Kim J.M.a · Na B.R.a · Kim C.-H.a · Park H.J.b

Author affiliations

Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,aKonkuk University School of Medicine, and bAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Related Articles for ""

Audiol Neurotol 2012;17:228–234

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: September 20, 2011
Accepted: January 23, 2012
Published online: April 05, 2012
Issue release date: June 2012

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1420-3030 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9700 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/AUD

Abstract

Although biphasic head-shaking nystagmus (HSN) is a basic response to head shaking in patients with unilateral vestibular loss, monophasic HSN is commonly seen in patients with dizziness of undetermined etiology. Since the clinical significance of HSN remains unclear, we sought to characterize different types of HSN in patients with vestibular neuritis (VN) during the acute stage (within 7 days after the onset of vertigo) and at follow-up (about 2 months after the onset of vertigo), and to compare HSN and caloric responses. We analyzed HSN, spontaneous nystagmus and caloric tests in 66 patients with VN. Overall, HSN showed high abnormal rates (94 and 89%) during the acute and follow-up stages and could detect vestibular hypofunction even when canal paresis (CP) had normalized at follow-up. All patients in the acute stage and most patients at follow-up showed HSN with the slow phase to the lesioned side (paretic). Biphasic HSN was common at follow-up, and many patients with a monophasic paretic pattern during the acute stage had evolved to a biphasic paretic pattern at follow-up. Initial slow-phase eye velocities (SPVs) in biphasic HSN were larger than those in monophasic HSN at follow-up. Absence of HSN or reversal of its direction was closely related to normalized caloric responses, but SPVs of HSN did not correlate with the severity of CP. These findings indicate that the HSN test is a sensitive detector of vestibular hypofunction upon 2-Hz head rotation. HSN may reveal previous vestibular hypofunction in the 2-Hz frequency range even at follow-up, when caloric responses detecting vestibular hypofunction in the low-frequency range had normalized. The two tests utilize different mechanisms to assess vestibular hypofunction and are complementary. Biphasic paretic HSN is the most common pattern at follow-up and occurs when the initial SPVs induced by head rotation are large enough to induce the adaptation of primary vestibular afferent activity. Monophasic HSN, which is commonly found in dizzy patients, indicates less severe vestibular hypofunction than biphasic HSN in the 2-Hz frequency range, and the caloric tests can provide further information about the side and presence of vestibular hypofunction at lower frequencies.

© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Asawavichiangianda S, Fujimoto M, Mai M, Desroches H, Rutka J: Significance of head-shaking nystagmus in the evaluation of the dizzy patient. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1999;540:27–33.
  2. Brantberg K, Fransson PA, Bergenius J, Tribukait A: Tilt suppression, OKAN, and head-shaking nystagmus at long-term follow-up after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. J Vestib Res 1996;6:235–241.
  3. Choi KD, Oh SY, Park SH, Kim JH, Koo JW, Kim JS: Head-shaking nystagmus in lateral medullary infarction: patterns and possible mechanisms. Neurology 2007;68:1337–1344.
    External Resources
  4. Della Santina CC, Cremer PD, Carey JP, Minor LB: Comparison of head thrust test with head autorotation test reveals that the vestibulo-ocular reflex is enhanced during voluntary head movements. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1044–1054.
  5. Fetter M, Zee DS, Koenig E, Dichgans J: Head-shaking nystagmus during vestibular compensation in humans and rhesus monkeys. Acta Otolaryngol 1990;110:175–181.
  6. Gimeno-Vilar C, Rey-Martinez J, Perez N: Active versus passive head-shaking nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:722–728.
    External Resources
  7. Hain TC, Fetter M, Zee DS: Head-shaking nystagmus in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions. Am J Otolaryngol 1987;8:36–47.
  8. Hall SF, Laird ME: Is head-shaking nystagmus a sign of vestibular dysfunction? J Otolaryngol 1992;21:209–212.
  9. Harvey SA, Wood DJ, Feroah TR: Relationship of the head impulse test and head-shake nystagmus in reference to caloric testing. Am J Otol 1997;18:207–213.
  10. Iwasaki S, Ito K, Abbey K, Murofushi T: Prediction of canal paresis using head-shaking nystagmus test. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:803–806.
  11. Jacobson GP, Newman CW, Safadi I: Sensitivity and specificity of the head-shaking test for detecting vestibular system abnormalities. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:539–542.
  12. Kamei T: The two-phase occurrence of head-shaking nystagmus (in German). Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1975;209:59–67.
  13. Kamei T, Takegoshi T, Matsuzaki M: A quantitative analysis of head-shaking nystagmus of peripheral vestibular origin. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1995;520:216–219.
    External Resources
  14. Katsarkas A, Smith H, Galiana H: Head-shaking nystagmus (HSN): The theoretical explanation and the experimental proof. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:177–181.
  15. Kim HA, Hong JH, Lee H, Yi HA, Lee SR, Lee SY, Jang BC, Ahn BH, Baloh RW: Otolith dysfunction in vestibular neuritis: recovery pattern and a predictor of symptom recovery. Neurology 2008;70:449–453.
    External Resources
  16. Maire R, van Melle G: Dynamic asymmetry of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in unilateral peripheral vestibular and cochleovestibular loss. Laryngoscope 2000;110:256–263.
  17. Matsuzaki M, Kamei T: Stage-assessment of the progress of continuous vertigo of peripheral origin by means of spontaneous and head-shaking nystagmus findings. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1995;519:188–190.
  18. Park H, Hong SC, Shin J: Clinical significance of vibration-induced nystagmus and head-shaking nystagmus through follow-up examinations in patients with vestibular neuritis. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:375–379.
    External Resources
  19. Park H, Shin J, Jeong Y, Kwak H, Lee Y: Lessons from follow-up examinations in patients with vestibular neuritis: how to interpret findings from vestibular function tests at a compensated stage. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:806–811.
  20. Park HJ, Migliaccio AA, Della Santina CC, Minor LB, Carey JP: Search-coil head-thrust and caloric tests in Menière’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:852–857.
  21. Perez P, Llorente JL, Gomez JR, Del Campo A, Lopez A, Suarez C: Functional significance of peripheral head-shaking nystagmus. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1078–1084.
    External Resources
  22. Vogel K: Über den Nachweis des latenten Spontannystagmus. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1932;22:202–207.
  23. Wei D, Hain TC, Proctor LR: Head-shaking nystagmus: associations with canal paresis and hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 1989;108:362–367.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: September 20, 2011
Accepted: January 23, 2012
Published online: April 05, 2012
Issue release date: June 2012

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1420-3030 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9700 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/AUD


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP