Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis: Catching the Culprit – Clinical and Imaging AnalysisJain S.b · Saluja S.S.a · Sharma A.K.b · Sant H.b · Mishra P.K.a
Departments of aGastrointestinal Surgery and bRadiology, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Radiological and intraoperative findings of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) mimic carcinoma gallbladder (CaGB) leading to extended surgical resections and increased morbidity. We reviewed the clinical and CECT findings of histopathologically proven XGC and compared them with those of CaGB. Methods: The clinical and CECT findings from 22 patients with XGC were compared with 15 patients with CaGB manifesting as diffuse wall thickening. Results: GB wall thickness was similar in both groups (XGC 12.4 ± 3 mm, CaGB 13.9 ± 6.5 mm; p = 0.61). Intramural hypoattenuating nodules occupying >60% of the GB wall were suggestive of XGC, while the absence of nodules suggested CaGB (p = 0.017). The mucosal lining was intact and enhancing in XGC (20/22) and disrupted in CaGB (10/15; p = 0.001). Among adjacent organ infiltration, bile duct invasion resulting in obstruction was a significant finding in patients with CaGB (p = 0.04). Among XGC patients, 11 patients underwent radical cholecystectomy, 10 had open cholecystectomy and frozen section and 1 underwent bypass. Conclusions: Though there is an overlap between XGC and CaGB, the presence of intramural hypoattenuating nodules occupying >60% of the diffusely thickened GB wall with intact mucosal line and the absence of obstructive features suggest XGC. In the presence of such imaging features, frozen biopsy should be done before proceeding with mutilating radical surgery.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.