Fine Needle Aspiration
Lymphoproliferative Disorders of the Kidney on Fine-Needle Aspiration: Cytomorphology and Radiographic Correlates in 33 CasesSubhawong A.P.a · Subhawong T.K.b · VandenBussche C.J.a · Siddiqui M.T.c · Ali S.Z.a, b
Departments of aPathology and bRadiology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md., and cDepartment of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Unless renal lesions present in the setting of widespread lymphoma, biopsy can be indicated to differentiate from metastases, hypovascular renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma or infection. We review our experience with lymphoproliferative disorders in the kidney diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and focus on clinicopathologic and radiographic features. Design: All cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed on renal FNA at 2 academic institutions between 1989 and 2011 were reviewed. Clinical history, radiographic and cytomorphologic features, and follow-up were assessed. Results: 33 cases were identified, with 15 primary tumors and 18 recurrences/secondary tumors including 1 acute lymphoblastic lymphoma. The majority were aggressive/high-grade lesions (25/33). 25 cases were substantiated by positive flow cytometry results. Most were detected at follow-up/incidentally. 22 cases showed multiple renal and/or retroperitoneal masses or a significant component of adenopathy; others showed a solitary renal mass. Salient radiologic features included hypodense, infiltrative and ill-defined masses. Cytomorphology showed a monotonous population of large atypical lymphoid cells, often with lymphoglandular bodies. Conclusion: Cytologic diagnosis of renal lymphoma requires analysis of morphological, clinical and immunophenotypic information. Helpful features for diagnosis include: multiple masses on computed tomography, a monotonous population of abnormal cells in a background of lymphoglandular bodies and immunophenotyping demonstrating light chain restriction.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.