Slow-Release Oral Morphine Sulfate Abuse: Results of the Postmarketing Surveillance Systems for Psychoactive Prescription Drug Abuse in FrancePeyriere H.a · Eiden C.a · Micallef J.b · Lapeyre-Mestre M.c · Faillie J.-L.a · Blayac J.-P.a · and the network of the French Centre for Evaluation and Information on Pharmacodependence
aDépartement de Pharmacologie Médicale et Toxicologie, Centre d’Evaluation et d’Information sur la Pharmacodépendance-Addictovigilance (CEIP-A), Hôpital Lapeyronie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, bCentre d’Evaluation et d’Information sur la Pharmacodépendance-Addictovigilance, UMR6193, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Marseille, Marseille, and cCEIP-A, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpitaux de Toulouse, Equipe de Pharmacoépidémiologie Unité INSERM 1027, Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Few data are available concerning the diversion and abuse of morphine sulfate. In France, morphine sulfate abuse is currently investigated by the health authorities. The aim of our study was to provide data on morphine sulfate abuse in France, collected during the period 1996–2011. Methods: The French monitoring system for psychoactive medication abuse collected data from several sources: spontaneous reporting of cases of abuse or dependence (NotS; ‘Notifications Spontanées’), specific periodic surveys from specialized care centers (OPPIDUM; ‘Observation des Produits Psychotropes Illicites ou Détournés de leur Utilisation Médicamenteuse’), and community pharmacists (OSIAP; ‘Ordonnances Suspectes Indicateur d’Abus Possible’). Results: A total of 649 cases (75% men, median age: 34 years) were spontaneously reported: 578 cases of abuse and 71 cases of use as opiate maintenance treatment. The medication formulation was Skenan® (614 cases), and Moscontin® (35 cases). All surveys (NotS, OPPIDUM, and OSIAP) showed an overrepresentation of Skenan® (87.9–94.6% of cases) that was intravenously injected in 60.4–61.2% of the cases. Data analysis showed that patients abusing morphine sulfate have a long history of drug abuse and a history of polydrug use. Conclusion: All the data presented in this study highlight the level of morphine sulfate abuse, specify the modalities of use (intravenous route), and show the risks associated with abuse (infectious diseases). This study outlines the usefulness of our epidemiological tools, and provides evidence supporting intensive surveillance.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.