Modeling of the Impact on Health Outcomes of the Use of Dabigatran in Patients with Atrial FibrillationChevalier J.a · Giroud M.b · de Pouvourville G.a
aChair of Health Systems, ESSEC Business School, Cergy-Pontoise, and bDijon Stroke Registry, EA4184, Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Medical School of Dijon, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Paris
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the main direct cause of stroke. Prevention by anticoagulation or antithrombotic treatment is required, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and aspirin being the main agents. Dabigatran etexilate is a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor. The RE-LY study demonstrated that in patients with AF, the rates of stroke and systemic embolism were similar (at a dose of 110 mg) or lower (at a dose of 150 mg) than those observed in patients treated with warfarin, a VKA. The aim of the present study was to estimate, through modeling, the number of severe events avoided with dabigatran at dosages of 110 mg (D110) or 150 mg (D150) twice daily compared to warfarin, when prescribed in the French population for patients with AF who meet the inclusion criteria of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) study. Methods: We used a decision tree type model to simulate the outcome at 5 years in a cohort of patients eligible for treatment with dabigatran. We compared 3 hypothetical cohorts: all AF patients are treated with D110, D150 and warfarin. Based on the probabilities of occurrence of the different outcomes observed in the RE-LY study and in the Dijon Stroke Registry, we simulated for each year during 5 years the evolution of the 3 cohorts. The model allows to simulate a prevalent cohort of 461,392 patients at year zero, with a follow-up of 5 years (‘constant prevalence model'), and it can also take into account incident patients during 5 years (‘dynamic prevalence model'). The different events taken into account were: major hemorrhages (excluding hemorrhagic strokes), myocardial infarctions, hemorrhagic strokes, ischemic strokes, recurrence of strokes (without differentiating the mechanism) or deaths. Results: Considering the constant prevalence model, the use of D110 instead of warfarin for the whole target population in France would permit to avoid 10,012 events and to save 18,879 years of life in a period of 5 years. These figures are 13,484 and 27,736 for D150 instead of warfarin. Considering the dynamic prevalence model, the use of D110 for the whole target population in France would permit to avoid 13,620 events and to save 22,674 years of life in a period of 5 years. These figures are 18,186 and 33,091 for D150. Conclusion: The use of dabigatran would lead to a significant reduction of strokes and deaths attributable to AF in France.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
Le Heuzey JY: Epidémiologie, étiologie et mécanisme de la fibrillation atriale. Bull Acad Natl Méd 2011;195:953-962.
- Hannon N, Sheehan O, Kelly L, Marnane M, Merwick A, Moore A, Kyne L, Duggan J, Moroney J, McCormack PM, Daly L, Fitz-Simon N, Harris D, Horgan G, Williams EB, Furie KL, Kelly PJ: Stroke associated with atrial fibrillation - incidence and early outcomes in the North Dublin Population Stroke Study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:43-49.
- Tu HT, Campbell BC, Christensen S, Collins M, De Silva DA, Butcher KS, Parsons MW, Desmond PM, Barber PA, Levi CR, Bladin CF, Donnan GA, Davis SM: Pathophysiological determinants of worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;30:389-395.
- Atrial Fibrillation Investigators: Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from 5 randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1449-1457.
- Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L, RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators: Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139-1151.
- Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Reilly PA, Wallentin L: Newly Identified Events in the RELY Trial. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1875-1876.
Cegedim Strategic Data: La segmentation des patients FA selon les définitions RE-LY chez les médecins généralistes. Market research report to Boehringer Ingelheim France, October 2010.
- Roskell NS, Lip GY, Noack H, Clemens A, Plumb JM: Treatments for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis and indirect comparisons versus dabigatran etexilate. Thromb Haemost 2010;104:1106-1115.
- Van Walraven C, Hart RG, Singer DE, Laupacis A, Connolly S, Petersen P, Koudstaal PJ, Chang Y, Hellemons B: Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis. JAMA 2002;288:2441-2448.
Bejot Y, Rouaud O, Benatru I, Fromont A, Couvreur G, Caillier M: Les apports du registre dijonnais des accidents vasculaires cérébraux en 20 ans d'activité. Rev Neurol 2008;16:138-147.
- Singer DE, Chang Y, Fang MC, Borowsky LH, Pomernacki NK, Udaltsova N, Go AS: The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:297-305.
Banerjee A, Lane DA, Torp-Pedersen C, Lip GYH: Net clinical benefit of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus no treatment in a ‘real world' atrial fibrillation population: a modelling analysis based on a nationwide cohort study Thromb Haemost 2012;107:584-589.
- Kansal RA, Sorensen SV, Gani R, Robinson P, Pan F, Plumb JM, Cowie MR: Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in UK patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart 2012;98:573-578.
- Pink J, Lane S, Pirmohamed M, Hughes DA: Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin in management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in UK context: quantitative benefit-harm and economic analyses. BMJ 2011;343:d6333.
- Sorensen SV, Kansal RA, Connolly S, Peng S Linnehan J, Bradley-Kennedy C, Plumb JM: Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation: a Canadian payer perspective. Thromb Haemost 2011;105:908-919.
- Pengo V, Crippa L Falanga A, Finazz G, Marongiu F, Palareti G, Poli D, Testa S, Tiraferri E, Tosetto A, Tripodi A, Manotti C: Questions and answers on the use of dabigatran and perpectives on the use of other new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 2011;106:868-876.
AFSSAPS: Suivi biologique du traitement par antivitamine K (étude 2003). January 2004. http://ansm.sante.fr/Dossiers-thematiques/Anti-vitamine-K-AVK/Etudes-et-enquetes-sur-les-AVK.
- Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB: Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983-988.
- Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB: Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke 1996;27:1760-1764.
- Kaarisalo MM, Immonen-Räihä P, Marttila RJ, Salomaa V, Kaarsalo E, Salmi K, Sarti C, Sivenius J, Torppa J, Tuomilehto J: Atrial fibrillation and stroke. Mortality and causes of death after the first acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1997;28:311-315.
- Lamassa M, Di Carlo A, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Trefoloni G, Vanni P, Spolveri S, Baruffi MC, Landini G, Ghetti A, Wolfe CD, Inzitari D: Characteristics, outcome, and care of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry (the European Community Stroke Project). Stroke 2001;32:392-398.
- Penado S, Cano M, Acha O, Hernández JL, Riancho JA: Atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for stroke recurrence. Am J Med 2003;114:206-210.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.