Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Manifestations of Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Study on Acute Abdominal Pain

Laurell H.a · Hansson L.-E.b · Gunnarsson U.c

Author affiliations

Departments of Surgery ataMora Hospital, Mora, bSahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, and cKarolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Related Articles for ""

Dig Surg 2013;30:198-206

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 19, 2012
Accepted: February 19, 2013
Published online: July 06, 2013
Issue release date: August 2013

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 6

ISSN: 0253-4886 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9883 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DSU

Abstract

Background/Aims: The aim of this prospective study was to identify the clinical symptoms and signs most important for the prediction of appendicitis among patients with acute abdominal pain. Methods: Clinical findings in 2,478 patients admitted to the emergency department of Mora Hospital from February 1997 to June 2000, with acute abdominal pain of up to 7 days' duration, were registered in a database. The medical records were reviewed after 1 year. Results: A total of 432 patients were suspected of having appendicitis and in 221 this diagnosis was confirmed. Some 53 patients, with another preliminary diagnosis, were eventually found to suffer from appendicitis, making a total of 274 patients with appendicitis. Appendectomy was performed in 316 patients and was negative in 14%. Clinical diagnosis of appendicitis had a sensitivity of 0.81, a specificity of 0.90, a positive predictive value of 0.51, a positive likelihood ratio of 8.1, and a diagnostic accuracy of 0.89. The highest odds ratios were found for isolated tenderness in the right iliac fossa (3.29), rebound tenderness (3.00), right-sided rectal tenderness (2.53), migration of pain to the right iliac fossa (2.18), and local guarding (2.11). Conclusion: Clinical findings indicating localised inflammation in the right iliac fossa were reliable in predicting acute appendicitis. The patients' history of pain combined with a careful clinical examination still plays an important role in detecting appendicitis among patients with acute abdominal pain.

© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Fenyö G, Boijsen M, Enochsson L, Goldinger M, Gröndal S, Lundquist P, et al: Acute abdomen calls for considerable care resources. Analysis of 3,727 in-patients in the county of Stockholm during the first quarter of 1995 (article in Swedish). Läkartidningen 2000;97:4008-4012.
  2. Blomqvist P, Ljung H, Nyrén O, Ekbom A: Appendectomy in Sweden 1989-1993 assessed by the Inpatient Registry. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:859-865.
  3. Horrocks JC, de Dombal FT: Proceedings: human and computer-aided diagnosis of ‘dyspepsia'. Br J Surg 1973;60:910.
  4. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ: Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:537-546.
  5. Kalliakmanis V, Pikoulis E, Karavokyros IG, Felekouras E, Morfaki P, Haralambopoulou G, et al: Acute appendicitis: the reliability of diagnosis by clinical assessment alone. Scand J Surg 2005;94:201-206.
  6. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, Ravn H, Offenbartl SK, Nyström PO, et al: Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg 1999;23:133-140.
  7. Hansson LE, Laurell H, Gunnarsson U: Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 2008;25:394-399.
  8. Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P: A computer-based diagnostic score to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study of 1,333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1992;7:86-90.
  9. Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I, Hiatt JR, Margulies DR: Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 2002;137:995-998, discussion 999.
  10. Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H, Kisker O, Rothmund M: ‘Surgical' ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 1997;11:362-365.
  11. Alvarado A: A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:557-564.
  12. Al-Hashemy AM, Seleem MI: Appraisal of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in adults. Saudi Med J 2004;25:1229-1231.
  13. Denizbasi A, Unluer EE: The role of the emergency medicine resident using the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the general surgery resident. Eur J Emerg Med 2003;10:296-301.
  14. Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P: Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study of patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1992;7:81-85.
  15. Enochsson L, Gudbjartsson T, Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, et al: The Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women - a prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1509-1513.
  16. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Ravn H, Offenbartl K, Ghazi SH, Nyström PO, et al: Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis. World J Surg 2000;24:479-485, discussion 485.
  17. John H, Neff U, Kelemen M: Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg 1993;17:243-249.
  18. Kessler C, Bauer S: Utility of the digital rectal examination in the emergency department: a review. J Emerg Med 2012;43:1196-1204.
  19. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, et al: Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 2010;256:460-465.
  20. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP: Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001;286:1748-1753.
  21. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS: Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001;136:556-562.
  22. Santillanes G, Simms S, Gausche-Hill M, Diament M, Putnam B, Renslo R, Lee J, Tinger E, Lewis R: Prospective evaluation of a clinical practice guideline for diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:886-893.
  23. Dingemann J, Ure B: Imaging and the use of scores for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012;22:195-200.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 19, 2012
Accepted: February 19, 2013
Published online: July 06, 2013
Issue release date: August 2013

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 6

ISSN: 0253-4886 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9883 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DSU


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.