Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Study Medication and Risk of Recurrent Stroke and Cardiovascular Events: Results from the PRoFESS StudyWeimar C.a · Cotton D.c · Sha N.c · Sacco R.L.b · Bath P.M.W.d · Weber R.a, e · Diener H.C.a · for the PRoFESS study group
aDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; bDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Fla., and cBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, Conn., USA; dStroke Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; eDepartment of Neurology, Alfried Krupp Hospital Essen, Germany
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Several case control studies have reported an increased risk of cardiovascular events following discontinuation of antiplatelet agents in high-risk patients. We therefore sought to investigate the risk of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events following discontinuation of antiplatelet study medication in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial, a large randomized secondary stroke prevention study. Methods: The recurrent stroke and cardiovascular event rates following discontinuation of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (ASA + ERDP) or clopidogrel were compared to the event rates in the on-treatment populations (patients who had discontinued their antiplatelet medication due to an outcome event were kept in the on-treatment population in order not to underestimate the on-treatment stroke rate). Results: In 7,212 treated ASA + ERDP patients, the stroke incidence rate for the on-treatment group was 729 strokes with an average exposure of 17,048 person-years (0.12 per 1,000 person-days). For 7,864 treated clopidogrel patients, the stroke incidence rate for the on-treatment group was 737 strokes with an average exposure of 18,715 person-years (0.11 per 1,000 person-days). ASA + ERDP was discontinued in 2,843 patients (in 57.7% due to an adverse event, 28.2% noncompliance, 1.4% loss to follow-up, 4.5% withdrawal of consent and 8.1% other/nonspecified reasons) and clopidogrel was permanently discontinued in 2,176 patients (49.0% due to an adverse event, 34.2% noncompliance, 1.8% loss to follow-up, 5.3% withdrawal of consent and 9.7% other/nonspecified reasons). Within 30 days, a recurrent stroke occurred in 31 patients (0.37 per 1,000 person-days) after discontinuation of ASA + ERDP and in 15 patients (0.24 per 1,000 person-days) after discontinuation of clopidogrel. This corresponds to an absolute excess risk of 0.77% within 30 days after discontinuation of ASA + ERDP and 0.40% within 30 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel compared with the on-treatment study populations. A combined vascular endpoint (stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular death) occurred in 68 patients (0.82 per 1,000 person-days) within 30 days after discontinuation of ASA + ERDP and in 47 patients (0.75 per 1,000 person-days) within 30 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel. This corresponds to an absolute excess risk of 2.02% within 30 days after discontinuation of ASA + ERDP and 1.83% within 30 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel compared with the on-treatment study populations. Conclusion: Discontinuation of antiplatelet medication after ischemic stroke should be advocated only when the risk and severity of bleeding clearly outweigh the risk of cardiovascular events.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.