Improved Clinical Outcome after Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion since the Introduction of Endovascular Thrombectomy DevicesNagel S.a · Kellert L.a · Möhlenbruch M.b · Bösel J.a · Rohde S.b · Ringleb P.a
Departments of aNeurology and bNeuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Thrombectomy devices are increasingly used for intra-arterial recanalization therapy in stroke. We analyzed whether the use of these devices modified the outcome of patients with acute basilar occlusion (BAO) at our institution. Methods: Between 1998 and 2012, one hundred forty-seven consecutive patients with acute BAO received recanalization therapy. In July 2009, for the first time, a thrombectomy device was used and hence the cohort was split into two chronological groups: BAO-1 (before July 2009) and BAO-2 (after July 2009). All patients were treated at a dedicated neurological ICU following institutional standard operating procedures. A good clinical outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 after 3 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied using outcome parameters as dependent variables and baseline variables with a significant p value in univariate tests as independent variables. Results: One hundred eleven patients (BAO-1) were treated before and 36 were treated after July 2009 (BAO-2). Patients in the BAO-1 and BAO-2 groups had similar neurological deficits on admission as expressed by the Glasgow Coma Scale (BAO-1: median 4, IQR 5, vs. BAO-2: median 4.5, IQR 8, p = 0.41) and the proportion of patients who were presented intubated and ventilated was similar in both groups as well (49.5 vs. 47.7%, p = 0.85). Bridging concepts with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) were applied in 18.9% (BAO-1) versus 63.9% (BAO-2, p < 0.001) of cases, whereas glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists were used significantly more frequently in the BAO-1 cohort (57.7 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.034). Thrombectomies were performed in 20 patients (55.5%) of the BAO-2 group but in none of the BAO-1 cohort. Complete recanalization (TICI 3) was achieved in 45.1% (BAO-1) versus 66.7% (BAO-2, p = 0.062) of patients. A good clinical outcome was observed in 13.5% of the BAO-1 group and 30.6% of the BAO-2 cohort (p = 0.026); mortality was 57.7% in the earlier group and 36.1% in the later group (p = 0.034). The frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in both groups (8.1% BAO-1 vs. 2.8% BAO-2, p = 0.45). Treatment in the BAO-2 cohort was an independent predictor of good clinical outcome (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.01-6.78) and mortality (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.86) in an adjusted logistic regression model. Conclusion: Our results show improved outcomes in patients in the BAO-2 cohort. The treatment approach in this group was an independent predictor of both good outcome and mortality. Especially in patients with BAO - where endovascular treatment strategies are common clinical practice - bridging protocols with rtPA and modern thrombectomy devices should be used more frequently.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Mattle HP, Arnold M, Lindsberg PJ, Schonewille WJ, Schroth G: Basilar artery occlusion. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:1002-1014.
- Eckert B, Koch C, Thomalla G, et al: Aggressive therapy with intravenous abciximab and intra-arterial rtPA and additional PTA/stenting improves clinical outcome in acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: combined local fibrinolysis and intravenous abciximab in acute vertebrobasilar stroke treatment (fast) - results of a multicenter study. Stroke 2005;36:1160-1165.
- Nagel S, Schellinger PD, Hartmann M, et al: Therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: intraarterial thrombolysis alone vs. bridging therapy. Stroke 2009;40:140-146.
- Taqi MA, Vora N, Callison RC, Lin R, Wolfe TJ: Past, present, and future of endovascular stroke therapies. Neurology 2012;79:S213-S220.
- Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, et al: Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109-e137.
- Lindsberg PJ, Mattle HP: Therapy of basilar artery occlusion: a systematic analysis comparing intra-arterial and intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 2006;37:922-928.
- Schonewille WJ, Wijman CA, Michel P, et al: Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the basilar artery international cooperation study (basics): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:724-730.
- Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al: Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;380:1241-1249.
- Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, et al: TREVO versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet 2012;380:1231-1240.
- Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al: Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893-903.
- Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, et al: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904-913.
- Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, et al: A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914-923.
- Mordasini P, Brekenfeld C, Byrne JV, et al: Technical feasibility and application of mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire FR Revascularization Device in acute basilar artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;34:159-163.
- Andersson T, Kuntze Soderqvist A, Soderman M, Holmin S, Wahlgren N, Kaijser M: Mechanical thrombectomy as the primary treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion: experience from 5 years of practice. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:221-225.
- Kellert L, Hametner C, Rohde S, et al: Endovascular stroke therapy: tirofiban is associated with risk of fatal intracerebral hemorrhage and poor outcome. Stroke 2013;44:1453-1455.
- Espinosa de Rueda M, Parrilla G, Zamarro J, Garcia-Villalba B, Hernandez F, Moreno A: Treatment of acute vertebrobasilar occlusion using thrombectomy with stent retrievers: initial experience with 18 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;44:1044-1048.
- Roth C, Mielke A, Siekmann R, Ferbert A: First experiences with a new device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:28-34.
- Costalat V, Machi P, Lobotesis K, et al: Rescue, combined, and stand-alone thrombectomy in the management of large vessel occlusion stroke using the Solitaire device: a prospective 50-patient single-center study - timing, safety, and efficacy. Stroke 2011;42:1929-1935.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.