Hypothermia Makes Cerebral Resistance Index a Poor Prognostic Tool in Encephalopathic NewbornsSkranes J.H.a, c · Elstad M.b · Thoresen M.b, d · Cowan F.M.d · Stiris T.a, c · Fugelseth D.a
aInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, and bDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, and cDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; dNeonatal Neuroscience, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Severe neonatal encephalopathy (NE) of hypoxic-ischaemic origin may cause death or life-long disability. Acute encephalopathy may also affect cerebrovascular control. Pourcelot's cerebrovascular resistance index (RI) ≤0.55 was predictive of poor outcome in normothermic NE infants. Recent studies have questioned its predictive power during therapeutic hypothermia (HT). Objective: To assess the predictive power of RI during HT and after rewarming. Methods: 45 infants with NE treated with HT for 72 h had their RI calculated during early (median 11 h) and late (median 62 h) cooling and after rewarming (median 89 h). Poor outcome was defined as death or abnormalities on day 10 magnetic resonance imaging shown to predict severe neuromotor disability. Results: RI ≤0.55 during cooling did not differentiate between good and poor outcome (late cooling, p = 0.08), but was powerful after rewarming (p = 0.004). RI ≤0.55 predicted true poor outcome in 43% (95% confidence interval (CI): 12, 80) during late cooling and in 100% (95% CI: 31, 100) after rewarming. RI >0.55 predicted good outcome in 86% (95% CI: 69, 95) during late cooling and in 89% (95% CI: 74, 96) after rewarming. Conclusions: Low RI is not predictive of poor outcome during HT in NE infants, but regains the predictive power seen in normothermic infants after rewarming.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.