Authors, Editors, Reviewers

Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login can be found directly on our journal pages.


Journal Overview

Institutional Login

Karger supports the identity and access management tools Shibboleth and OpenAthens for subscribing institutions.


Institutional Login

Original Paper

Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Patient- and Parent-Reported Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) Questionnaire

Bullinger M.a · Quitmann J.a · Silva N.a, g · Rohenkohl A.a · Chaplin J.E.b · DeBusk K.c · Mimoun E.e · Feigerlova E.e · Herdman M.f · Sanz D.f · Wollmann H.d · Pleil A.d · Power M.c

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; bDepartment of Paediatrics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Växthuset, Queen Silvia's Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; cDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, and dPfizer Ltd., Specialty Care MDG, Endocrinology, Walton Oaks, UK; eDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, University of Toulouse, CHU, Toulouse, France; fInsight Consulting and Research, IMIM University, Mataró, Spain; gFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Related Articles for ""

Horm Res Paediatr 2014;82:18-30

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: July 02, 2013
Accepted: January 17, 2014
Published online: June 11, 2014
Issue release date: July 2014

Number of Print Pages: 13
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 10

ISSN: 1663-2818 (Print)
eISSN: 1663-2826 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HRP

Abstract

Background: Testing cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcomes requires sufficiently large samples per country, which is difficult to achieve in rare endocrine paediatric conditions. We describe a novel approach to cross-cultural testing of the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaire in five countries by sequentially taking one country out (TOCO) from the total sample and iteratively comparing the resulting psychometric performance. Methods: Development of the QoLISSY proceeded from focus group discussions through pilot testing to field testing in 268 short-statured patients and their parents. To explore cross-cultural equivalence, the iterative TOCO technique was used to examine and compare the validity, reliability, and convergence of patient and parent responses on QoLISSY in the field test dataset, and to predict QoLISSY scores from clinical, socio-demographic and psychosocial variables. Results: Validity and reliability indicators were satisfactory for each sample after iteratively omitting one country. Comparisons with the total sample revealed cross-cultural equivalence in internal consistency and construct validity for patients and parents, high inter-rater agreement and a substantial proportion of QoLISSY variance explained by predictors. Conclusion: The TOCO technique is a powerful method to overcome problems of country-specific testing of patient-reported outcome instruments. It provides an empirical support to QoLISSY's cross-cultural equivalence and is recommended for future research.

© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Eiser C, Jenney M: Measuring quality of life. Arch Dis Child 2007;92:348-350.
  2. Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK: Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health 2004;7:79-92.
  3. Payot A, Barrington KJ: The quality of life of young children and infants with chronic medical problems: review of the literature. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2011;41:91-101.
  4. Gardner M, Sandberg DE: Growth hormone treatment for short stature: a review of psychosocial assumptions and empirical evidence. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2011;9:579-588; quiz 589.
    External Resources
  5. The European QoLISSY Group: Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth. The QoLISSY Questionnaire - User's Manual. Lengerich, Pabst Science Publishers, 2013.
  6. Brütt AL, Sandberg DE, Chaplin J, Wollmann H, Noeker M, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, Bullinger M: Assessment of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature. Part 1. A critical evaluation of available tools. Horm Res 2009;72:65-73.
  7. Bullinger M, Dellenmark Blom M, Feigerlova E, Herdman M, Lunde C, Mimoun E, Pleil A, Power M, Quitmann J, Rohenkohl A, Sanz D, Skoropadskaya A, Wollmann H, Chaplin J: Assessing quality of life in short stature youth - the QoLISSY project focus group and cognitive debriefing experience. Value Health 2010;13:63.
    External Resources
  8. Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N: Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Life Res 1993;2:451-459.
  9. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D: Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-1432.
  10. Bullinger M, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, Sandberg D, Chaplin J, Wollmann H, Noeker M, Brutt AL: Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature. Part 2. Available results and future directions. Horm Res 2009;72:74-81.
  11. Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT: Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 1987;101:213-232.
  12. Bullinger M, Quitmann J, Power M, Herdman M, Mimoun E, Debusk K, Feigerlova E, Lunde C, Dellenmark-Blom M, Sanz D, Rohenkohl A, Pleil A, Wollmann H, Chaplin JE: Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the QoLISSY instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:76.
  13. Preacher K: Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients (computer software), 2002. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
  14. DeVellis RF: Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1991.
  15. Nunnally JC: Psychometric Theory, ed 3. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  16. Byrne BM: Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2010.
  17. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE: Multivariate Data Analyses, ed 7. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 2010.
  18. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA: The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299-310.
  19. Ravens-Sieberer U, Bettge S: Aktuelles zum Kinder- und Jugendsurvey des RKI (KIGGS): Vorstellung des Moduls ‘Psychische Gesundheit'. Epid Bull 2004;1.
  20. Russell KMW, Hudson M, Long A, Phipps S: Assessment of health-related quality of life in children with cancer: consistency and agreement between parent and child reports. Cancer 2006;106:2267-2274.
  21. Upton P, Lawford J, Eiser C: Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2008;17:895-913.
  22. Rescorla LA, Ginzburg S, Achenbach TM, Ivanova MY, Almgvist F, Begovac I, Bilenberg N, Bird H, Chahed M, Dobrean A, Döpfner M, Erol N, Hannesdottir H, Kanbayashi Y, Lambert MC, Leung PW, Minaei A, Novik TS, Oh KJ, Petot D, Petot JM, Pomalima R, Rudan V, Sawyer M, Simsek M, Steinhausen HC, Valverde J, Ende J, Weintraub S, Metzke CW, Wolanczyk T, Zhang EY, Zukauskiene R, Verhulst FC: Cross-informant agreement between parent-reported and adolescent self-reported problems in 25 societies. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2013;42:262-273.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: July 02, 2013
Accepted: January 17, 2014
Published online: June 11, 2014
Issue release date: July 2014

Number of Print Pages: 13
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 10

ISSN: 1663-2818 (Print)
eISSN: 1663-2826 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HRP


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP