Background: Exergames are increasingly used as an exercise intervention to reduce fall risk in elderly. However, few exergames have been designed specifically for elderly, and we lack knowledge about the characteristics of the movements elicited by exergames and thereby about their potential to train functions important for fall risk reduction. Objective: This study investigates game elements and older players' movement characteristics during stepping exergames in order to inform exergame design for movement quality in the context of fall preventive exercise. Methods: Fourteen senior citizens (mean age 73 years ± 5.7, range 65 - 85) played 3 stepping exergames in a laboratory. Each of the exergames was described with respect to 7 game elements (physical space, sensing hardware technology, game graphics and sound, model of user, avatar/mapping of movements, game mechanism and game narrative). Five movement characteristics (weight shift; variation in step length, speed, and movement direction; visual independency) were scored on a 5-point Likert scale based on video observations of each player and each game. Disagreement between raters was resolved by agreement. Differences in scores for the 3 exergames were analyzed with a multivariate one-way ANOVA. Results: The Mole received the highest sum score and the best score on each of the 5 movement characteristics (all p values <0.0005). LightRace scored the lowest of the 3 exergames on weight shift and variation in movement direction (both p values <0.0005), while DanceDanceRevolution scored lowest on step length variation and visual independency (p < 0.03 and p < 0.0005, respectively), and lower than The Mole on speed variation (p < 0.05). The physical space players used when exergaming and the on-screen representation of the player, affected movement quality positively as indexed by multiple weight shifts and variation in stepping size, direction, and speed. Furthermore, players' movements improved when playing speed-affected game progression and when the game narrative was related to a natural context. Conclusion: Comparing differences in game elements with associated differences in game movement requirements provides valuable insights about how to design for movement quality in exergames. This provided important lessons for the design of exergames for fall-preventive exercise in senior citizens and illustrates the value of including analyses of movement characteristics when designing such exergames.

Keywords:
Elderly, Exergames, Movement characteristics, Stepping, Falls
1.
World Health Organization: Global Health and Ageing. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2011. http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf?ua=1 (accessed April 29, 2014).
2.
United Nations: World Population Ageing 2013. New York, United Nations, 2013. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2013.pdf (accessed April 29, 2014).
3.
Colombo F, Llena Nozal A, Mercier J, Tjadens F: Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. Paris, OECD, 2011.
4.
Institute of Medicine: Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington, The National Academies Press, 2012.
5.
Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK: Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1050-1056.
6.
Kannus P, Niemi S, Palvanen M, Parkkari J: Rising incidence of fall-induced injuries among elderly adults. J Public Health 2005;13:212-215.
7.
Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Sherrington C, Gates S, Clemson LM, Lamb SE: Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;CD007146.
8.
IJsselsteijn W, Nap HH, de Kort Y, Poels K: Digital game design for elderly users; in Kapralos B, Katchabaw M (eds): Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology: FuturePlay 2007, November 15-17, 2007, Toronto, Canada. New York, ACM Press, 2007, pp 17-22.
9.
Lange B, Flynn S, Proffitt R, Chang CY, Rizzo AS: Development of an interactive game-based rehabilitation tool for dynamic balance training. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17:345-352.
10.
Schoene D, Lord SR, Delbaere K, Severino C, Davies TA, Smith ST: A randomized controlled pilot study of home-based step training in older people using videogame technology. PLoS One 2013;8:e57734.
11.
de Bruin ED, Schoene D, Pichierri G, Smith ST: Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Some theoretical considerations. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2010;43:229-234.
12.
Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JCT: Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:2234-2243.
13.
Maki BE, Mcllroy WE: Control of rapid limb movements for balance recovery: age-related changes and implications for fall prevention. Age Ageing 2006;35:12-18.
14.
Melzer I, Kurz I, Sahar D, Oddsson LI: Do voluntary step reaction in dual task conditions have an added value over single task for fall prediction? A prospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2010;22:360-366.
15.
Moe-Nilssen R, Aaslund MK, Hodt-Billington C, Helbostad JL: Gait variability measures may represent different constructs. Gait Posture 2010;32:98-101.
16.
Mulder T, Zijlstra W, Geurts A: Assessment of motor recovery and decline. Gait Posture 2002;16:198-210.
17.
Uzor S, Baillie L, Skelton DA: Senior designers: empowering seniors to design enjoyable falls rehabilitation tools; in Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, ACM Press, 2012, pp 1179-1188.
18.
Bianchi-Berthouze N: Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Hum Comp Interact 2013;28:42-75.
19.
Pasch M, Bianchi-Berthouze N, van Dijk B, Nijholt A: Immersion in movement-based interaction; in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. Berlin, SpringerLink, 2009, pp 169-180.
20.
Sinclair J, Hingston P, Masek M: Exergame development using the dual flow model; in Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment. New York, ACM Press, 2009, pp 1-7.
21.
Gerling K, Livingston IJ, Nacke LE, Mandryk RL: Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults; in Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, ACM Press, 2012, pp 1873-1882.
22.
Hunnicke R, LeBlanc M, Zubek R: MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. San Jose, AAAI Press, 2004.
23.
Rademaker A, Linden S, Wiersinga J: SilverFit, a virtual rehabilitation system. Gerontechnology 2009;8:119.
24.
Lewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, McPherson KM: Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:453-463.
25.
Lewis GN, Rose JA: Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitation in neurological conditions: how do we meet the needs and expectations of the users? Disabil Rehabil 2013;34:1880-1886.
26.
Nap HH, de Kort YAW, IJsselsteijn WA: Senior gamers: preferences, motivations, and needs. Gerontechnology 2009;8:247-262.
27.
Shigematsu R, Okura T, Nakagaichi M, Tanaka K, Sakai T, Kitazumi S, Rantanen T: Square-stepping exercise and fall risk factors in older adults: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol 2008;63:76-82.
28.
Grewal G, Sayeed R, Yeschek S, Menzies RA, Talal TK, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Najafi B: Virtualizing the assessment: a novel pragmatic paradigm to evaluate lower extremity joint perception in diabetes. Gerontology 2012;58:463-471.
29.
Grewal G, Sayeed R, Schwenk M, Bharara M, Menzies RA, Talal TK, Armstrong DG, Najafi B: Balance rehabilitation promoting the role of virtual reality in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Am Podiatri Med Assoc 2013;103:498-507.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.