Ophthalmologica
Original Paper
Prognostic Factors Associated with Visual Outcome after Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Epiretinal MembraneLaban K.G. · Scheerlinck L.M.E. · van Leeuwen R.Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: February 01, 2015
Accepted: June 30, 2015
Published online: August 26, 2015
Issue release date: October 2015
Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/OPH
Abstract
Purpose: Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane has shown varying results. More data are needed on the factors associated with visual outcome. Methods: We extracted baseline clinical characteristics, optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristics and 3-month postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate whether baseline and OCT characteristics are associated with BCVA at 3 months as well as BCVA difference. Results: Out of 82 operated eyes, 66 (80%) had a 3-month follow-up, and 47 (71%) showed a 3-month postoperative improvement. Preoperative BCVA was an independent determinant of postoperative BCVA (r = 0.31; p < 0.01) and BCVA difference (r = 0.68; p < 0.01). Other baseline and OCT characteristics showed no independent associations with postoperative outcome. Conclusion: Better preoperative BCVA predicts better postoperative BCVA. Other baseline and OCT characteristics are not associated with visual outcome 3 months after surgery.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Pesin SR, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Boniuk I, Arribas NP, Thomas MA, Williams DF, Burgess D: Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia. Prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1109-1114.
- Bouwens MD, de Jong F, Mulder P, van Meurs JC: Results of macular pucker surgery: 1- and 5-year follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1693-1697.
- Schadlu R, Tehrani S, Shah GK, Prasad AG: Long-term follow-up results of ILM peeling during vitrectomy surgery for premacular fibrosis. Retina 2008;28:853-857.
- Panos GD, de Gottrau P: Idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery with simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling. The experience of the Fribourg Eye Clinic. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13876.
- Rice TA, De Bustros S, Michels RG, Thompson JT, Debanne SM, Rowland DY: Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology 1986;93:602-610.
- Scheerlinck LME, van der Valk R, van Leeuwen R: Predictive factors for postoperative visual acuity in idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol 2014, DOI: 10.1111/aos.12537.
- De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG, Rice TA, Glaser BM: Vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:692-695.
- Falkner-Radler CI, Glittenberg C, Hagen S, Benesch T, Binder S: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for monitoring epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology 2010;117:798-805.
- Wong JG, Sachdev N, Beaumont PE, Chang AA: Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2005;33:373-378.
- Kim HJ, Kang J-W, Chung H, Kim HC: Correlation of foveal photoreceptor integrity with visual outcome in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Curr Eye Res 2014;39:626-633.
- Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG: Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:473-480.e3.
- Mitamura Y, Hirano K, Baba T, Yamamoto S: Correlation of visual recovery with presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after epiretinal membrane surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:171-175.
- Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y, Kaneko T, Yamane S, Kobayashi S, Arakawa A: Preoperative inner segment/outer segment junction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 2011;31:1366-1372.
- Kim JH, Kim YM, Chung EJ, Lee SY, Koh HJ: Structural and functional predictors of visual outcome of epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:103-110.e1.
- Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, Hirota K, Hirakata A: Correlation between foveal cone outer segment tips line and visual recovery after epiretinal membrane surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:7302-7308.
- Trese MT, Chandler DB, Machemer R: Macular pucker. I. Prognostic criteria. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983;221:12-15.
- Kunikata H, Abe T, Kinukawa J, Nishida K: Preoperative factors predictive of postoperative decimal visual acuity ≥1.0 following surgical treatment for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:147-154.
- Shiono A, Kogo J, Klose G, Takeda H, Ueno H, Tokuda N, Inoue J: Photoreceptor outer segment length: a prognostic factor for idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology 2013;120:788-794.
- Kim JH, Kang SW, Kong MG, Ha HS: Assessment of retinal layers and visual rehabilitation after epiretinal membrane removal. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251:1055-1064.
- Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, Matsuki T, Ito S, Ishida K, Kurimoto Y: The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:698-704, 704.e1.
- Asaria R, Garnham L, Gregor ZJ, Sloper JJ: A prospective study of binocular visual function before and after successful surgery to remove a unilateral epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1930-1937.
- Brito PN, Gomes NL, Vieira MP, Faria PA, Fernandes A V, Rocha-Sousa A, Falcão-Reis F: Possible role for fundus autofluorescence as a predictive factor for visual acuity recovery after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 2014;34:273-280.
- Nitta E, Shiraga F, Shiragami C, Fukuda K, Yamashita A, Fujiwara A: Displacement of the retina and its recovery after vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:1014-1020.e1.
- Kinoshita T, Imaizumi H, Okushiba U, Miyamoto H, Ogino T, Mitamura Y: Time course of changes in metamorphopsia, visual acuity, and OCT parameters after successful epiretinal membrane surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:3592-3597.
- Cobos E, Arias L, Ruiz-Moreno J, Rubio M, Garcia-Bru P, Caminal J, Catala-Mora J, Arruga J: Preoperative study of the inner segment/outer segment junction of photoreceptors by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in patients with epiretinal membranes. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:1467-1470.
Article / Publication Details
Received: February 01, 2015
Accepted: June 30, 2015
Published online: August 26, 2015
Issue release date: October 2015
Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/OPH
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission