Background: Very preterm infants born outside tertiary centers are at higher risks of adverse outcomes than inborn infants. Regionalization of perinatal care has been introduced worldwide to improve outcomes. Objective: To compare the risk-adjusted outcomes of both inborn and outborn infants cared for in tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand and in Canada. Methods: Deidentified data of infants <32 weeks' gestational age from the 29 Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network units (ANZNN; n = 9,893) and 26 Canadian Neonatal Network units (CNN; n = 7,133) between 2005 and 2007 were analyzed for predischarge adverse outcomes. Results: ANZNN had lower rates of outborns compared to CNN (13 vs. 19%), particularly of late admissions (>2 days of age; 5.8 vs. 22.2% of outborns) who had high morbidity rates. After adjusting for confounding variables including gestation, ANZNN inborn infants had lower odds of chronic lung disease [CLD; 17.0 vs. 23.3%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77], severe neurological injuries on ultrasound (SNI; 4.1 vs. 6.7%; AOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.53-0.73), severe retinopathy (5.6 vs. 7%; AOR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84) and necrotizing enterocolitis (3.5 vs. 5.4%; AOR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56-0.79), but no difference in mortality odds. After excluding the late outborn admissions, ANZNN outborns had lower odds of SNI (AOR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32-0.58) and CLD (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.81) than CNN. Conclusions: ANZNN inborn and early admitted outborn infants had lower odds of neonatal morbidities than their CNN counterparts. However, compared to ANZNN, the higher CNN rates of outborns and their late admissions are likely related to the differences in regionalization and referral practices, and may explain differences in outcomes.

Keywords:
Outcomes, Neonatal intensive care unit, Regionalization
1.
Yu VY, Doyle LW: Regionalized long-term follow-up. Semin Neonatol 2004;9:135-144.
2.
Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, Goldenberg RL: Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:164-175.
3.
Simpson CD, Ye XY, Hellmann J, Tomlinson C: Trends in cause-specific mortality at a Canadian outborn NICU. Pediatrics 2010;126:e1538-e1544.
4.
Lui K, Abdel-Latif ME, Allgood CL, Bajuk B, Oei J, Berry A, Henderson-Smart D: Improved outcomes of extremely premature outborn infants: effects of strategic changes in perinatal and retrieval services. Pediatrics 2006;118:2076-2083.
5.
Gortmaker S, Sobol A, Clark C, Walker DK, Geronimus A: The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:517-524.
6.
Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A, Boulton J, Lee DS, Ting S, Liston R: The benefit of preterm birth at tertiary care centers is related to gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:617-622.
7.
Lasswell SM, Barfield WD, Rochat RW, Blackmon L: Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010;304:992-1000.
8.
Hossain S, Shah PS, Ye XY, Darlow BA, Lee SK, Lui K; Canadian Neonatal Network; Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network: Outcome comparison of very preterm infants cared for in the neonatal intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand and in Canada. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:881-888.
9.
Donoghue DA, Henderson-Smart DJ; Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network: The establishment of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. J Paediatr Child Health 2009;45:400-404.
10.
Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network: ANZNN Data Dictionary 2011/2012. Sydney, ANZNN, 2011-2012, 2013.
11.
The Canadian Neonatal Network: The Canadian Neonatal Network Abstractor's Manual. Toronto, CNN, 2012, 2013.
12.
Stark AR; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn: Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2004;114:1341-1347.
13.
Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H: Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 g. J Pediatr 1978;92:529-534.
14.
Isayama T, Lee SK, Mori R, Kusuda S, Fujimura M, Ye XY, Shah PS; Canadian Neonatal Network; Neonatal Research Network of Japan: Comparison of mortality and morbidity of very low birth weight infants between Canada and Japan. Pediatrics 2012;130:e957-e965.
15.
Ai C, Norton EC: Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econ Lett 2003;80:123-129.
16.
Karaca-Mandic P, Norton EC, Dowd B: Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res 2012;47:255-274.
17.
Kann IC, Solevåg AL: Economic and health consequences of non-invasive respiratory support in newborn infants - a difference-in-difference analysis using data from the Norwegian patient registry. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:494.
18.
Puhani PA: The treatment effect, the cross difference, and the interaction term in nonlinear ‘difference-in-differences' models. Econ Lett 2012;115:85-87.
19.
National Health and Medical Research Council: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Care around Preterm Birth. Canberra, National Health and Medical Research Council, 1997.
20.
Darlow BA, Cust AE, Donoghue DA: Improved outcomes for very low birthweight infants: evidence from New Zealand national population based data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F23-F28.
21.
Lee SK, Lee DS, Andrews WL, Baboolal R, Pendray M, Stewart S: Higher mortality rates among inborn infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units at night. J Pediatr 2003;143:592-597.
22.
Abdel-Latif ME, Bajuk B, Oei J, Lui K: Mortality and morbidities among very premature infants admitted after hours in an Australian neonatal intensive care unit network. Pediatrics 2006;117:1632-1639.
23.
Abdel-Latif ME, Bajuk B, Oei J, Vincent T, Sutton L, Lui K: Does rural or urban residence make a difference to neonatal outcome in premature birth? A regional study in Australia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91: F251-F256.
24.
Ko G, Shah P, Kovacs L, Ojah C, Riley P, Lee SK; Canadian Neonatal Network: Neighbourhood income level and outcomes of extremely preterm neonates: protection conferred by a universal health care system. Can J Public Health 2012;103:e443-e447.
25.
Roy RN, Kitchen WH: NETS: a new system for neonatal transport. Med J Aust 1977;2:855-858.
26.
Eliason SH, Whyte H, Dow K, Cronin CM, Lee S: Variations in transport outcomes of outborn infants among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Am J Perinatol 2012;30:377-382.
27.
McNamara PJ, Mak W, Whyte HE: Dedicated neonatal retrieval teams improve delivery room resuscitation of outborn premature infants. J Perinatol 2005;25:309-314.
28.
Hood JL, Cross A, Hulka B, Lawson EE: Effectiveness of the neonatal transport team. Crit Care Med 1983;11:419-423.
29.
Shah PS, Lee SK, Lui K, Sjors G, Mori R, Reichman B, Hakansson S, Feliciano LS, Modi N, Adams M, Darlow B, Fujimura M, Kusuda S, Haslam R, Mirea L; International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): The International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of very low birth weight, very preterm neonates (iNeo): a protocol for collaborative comparisons of international health services for quality improvement in neonatal care. BMC Pediatr 2014;14:110.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.