Gerontology
Clinical Section / Short Communication
A Combined Cognitive Stimulation and Physical Exercise Programme (MINDVital) in Early Dementia: Differential Effects on Single- and Dual-Task Gait PerformanceTay L. · Lim W.S. · Chan M. · Ali N. · Chong M.S.Cognition and Memory Disorders Service, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, and Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: August 12, 2015
Accepted: January 18, 2016
Published online: February 26, 2016
Issue release date: October 2016
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GER
Abstract
Background: Gait disorders are common in early dementia, with particularly pronounced dual-task deficits, contributing to the increased fall risk and mobility decline associated with cognitive impairment. Objective: This study examines the effects of a combined cognitive stimulation and physical exercise programme (MINDVital) on gait performance under single- and dual-task conditions in older adults with mild dementia. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with early dementia participated in a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation programme comprising both physical exercise and cognitive stimulation. The programme was conducted in 8-week cycles with participants attending once weekly, and all participants completed 2 successive cycles. Cognitive, functional performance and behavioural symptoms were assessed at baseline and at the end of each 8-week cycle. Gait speed was examined under both single- (Timed Up and Go and 6-metre walk tests) and dual-task (animal category and serial counting) conditions. A random effects model was performed for the independent effect of MINDVital on the primary outcome variable of gait speed under dual-task conditions. Results: The mean age of patients enroled in the rehabilitation programme was 79 ± 6.2 years; 25 (64.1%) had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia, and 26 (66.7%) were receiving a cognitive enhancer therapy. There was a significant improvement in cognitive performance [random effects coefficient (standard error) = 0.90 (0.31), p = 0.003] and gait speed under both dual-task situations [animal category: random effects coefficient = 0.04 (0.02), p = 0.039; serial counting: random effects coefficient = 0.05 (0.02), p = 0.013], with reduced dual-task cost for gait speed [serial counting: random effects coefficient = -4.05 (2.35), p = 0.086] following successive MINDVital cycles. No significant improvement in single-task gait speed was observed. Improved cognitive performance over time was a significant determinant of changes in dual-task gait speed [random effects coefficients = 0.01 (0.005), p = 0.048, and 0.02 (0.005), p = 0.003 for category fluency and counting backwards, respectively]. Conclusion: A combined physical and cognitive rehabilitation programme leads to significant improvements in dual-task walking in early dementia, which may be contributed by improvement in cognitive performance, as single-task gait performance remained stable.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Ijmker T, Lamoth C JC: Gait and cognition: the relationship between gait stability and variability with executive function in persons with and without dementia. Gait Posture 2012;35:126-130.
- Plummer P, Zukowski LA, Guiliani C, Hall AA, Zurakowski D: Effects of physical exercise interventions on gait-related dual-task interference in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerontology 2015;62:94-117.
- Steinmetz JP, Federspiel C: The effects of cognitive training on gait speed and stride variability in old adults: findings from a pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2014;26:635-643.
- Verghese J, Mahoney J, Ambrose AF, Wang C, Holtzer R: Effect of cognitive remediation on gait in sedentary seniors. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010;65A:1338-1343.
-
Schafer S, Huxhold O, Lindenberger U: Healthy mind in healthy body: a review of sensorimotor-cognitive interdependencies in old age. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2006;3:45-54.
External Resources
- Atkinson HH, Rosano C, Simmonsick EM, et al: Cognitive function, gait speed decline, and comorbidities: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci 2007;62:844-850.
- Herman T, Mirelman A, Giladi N, Schweiger A, Hausdorff JM: Executive control deficits as a prodrome to falls in healthy older adults: a prospective study linking thinking, walking, and falling. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci 2010;65:1086-1092.
- Lindenberger U, Marsiske M, Baltes PB: Memorizing while walking: increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychol Aging 2000;15:417-436.
- Grady C: The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:491-505.
- van het Reve E, de Bruin ED: Strength-balance supplemented with computerized cognitive training to improve dual-task gait and divided attention in older adults: a multicentre randomized-controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics 2014;14:134.
- Laessoe U, Hoeck HC, Simonsen O, Voigt M: Residual attentional capacity amongst young and elderly during dual and triple task walking. Hum Mov Sci 2008;27:496-512.
-
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 3 (revised). Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
- Sahadevan S, Lim PP, Tan NJ, Chan SP: Diagnostic performance of two mental status tests in the older Chinese: influence of education and age on cut-off values. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15:234-241.
- Mahoney FI, Barthel D: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:56-61.
- Barberger-Gateau P, Commenges D, Gagnon M, Letenneur L, Sauvel C, Dartigues JF: Instrumental activities of daily living as a screening tool for cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly community dwellers. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:1129-1134.
- Cummings JL: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology 1997;48:S10-S16.
- Munoz-Mendoza CL, Cabenero-Martinez MJ, Millan-Calenti JC, Caberoro-Garcia J, Lopez-Sanchez R, Maseda-Rodriguez A: Reliability of 4-m and 6-m walking speed tests in elderly people with cognitive impairment. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;52:e67-e70.
- Hall CD, Echt KV, Wolf SL, Rogers WA: Cognitive and motor mechanisms underlying older adults' ability to divide attention while walking. Phys Ther 2011;91:1039-1050.
- McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939-944.
- Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al: Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology 1993;43:250-260.
- Bridenbaugh SA, Kressig RW: Motor cognitive dual tasking: early detection of gait impairment, fall risk and cognitive decline. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2015;48:15-21.
- Yamada M, Aoyama T, Arai H, et al: Dual-task walk is a reliable predictor of falls in robust elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:163-164.
- Cedervall Y, Halvorsen K, Aberg AC: A longitudinal study of gait function and gait characteristics of gait disturbance in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Gait Posture 2014;39:1022-1027.
- Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA: Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:743-749.
- Tolea MI, Morris JC, Galvin JE: Trajectory of Mobility Decline by Type of Dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2015, Epub ahead of print.
- Swchenk M, Zieschang T, Oster P, Hauer K: Dual-task performances can be improved in patients with dementia. Neurology 2010;74:1961-1968.
Article / Publication Details
Received: August 12, 2015
Accepted: January 18, 2016
Published online: February 26, 2016
Issue release date: October 2016
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GER
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission