Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Review

The Body Acoustic: Ultrasonic Neuromodulation for Translational Medicine

Ventre D.M.a · Koppes A.N.b

Author affiliations

Departments of aBioengineering and bChemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Mass., USA

Related Articles for ""

Cells Tissues Organs 2015–16;202:23–41

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Review

Accepted: May 08, 2016
Published online: October 05, 2016
Issue release date: October 2016

Number of Print Pages: 19
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1422-6405 (Print)
eISSN: 1422-6421 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CTO

Abstract

For the greater part of the last century, ultrasound (US) has seen widespread use in applications ranging from materials science to medicine. The history of US in medicine has also seen promising success in clinical diagnostics and regenerative medicine. Recent studies have shown that US is able to manipulate the nervous system, leading toward potential treatment for various neuropathological conditions, a phenomenon known as ultrasonic neuromodulation (NM). Ultrasonic NM is a promising alternative to pharmaceuticals and surgery, due to high spatiotemporal resolution combined with the potentially noninvasive means of application. Current advances have made progress in establishing effective dosage limits, waveform parameters, and stimulus regimes in order to achieve desired effects in a variety of tissue and cell types. However, to date there has been limited systematic analysis of the complex variables involved in creating a therapeutic US stimulation regime specifically tailored to the nervous system. Without a fundamental understanding of the effects of US on neural tissue, including the surrounding bone, musculature, and vasculature, the safety and efficacy of US as an NM tool is yet to be determined. Advances in imaging technology and focusing hardware highlight new avenues for potential clinical applications for therapeutic ultrasonic stimulation. US may be an alternative to electrical and magnetic means of NM for targets in the central nervous system as well as in the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems. This review provides a historical perspective on the past, present, and future of US as a translational therapeutic.

© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Ang, E.S., V. Gluncic, A. Duque, M.E. Schafer, P. Rakic (2006) Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12903-12910.
  2. Beach, K.W. (1992) 1975-2000: a quarter century of ultrasound technology. Ultrasound Med Biol 18: 377-388.
  3. Benarroch, E.E. (2007) Enteric nervous system functional organization and neurologic implications. Neurology 69: 1953-1957.
  4. Blana, A., B. Walter, S. Rogenhofer, W.F. Wieland (2004) High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology 63: 297-300.
  5. Burger, J., M. Van't Riet, J. Jeekel (2002) Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scand J Surg 91: 315-321.
    External Resources
  6. Bystritsky, A., A.S. Korb, P.K. Douglas, M.S. Cohen, W.P. Melega, A.P. Mulgaonkar, A. DeSalles, B.K. Min, S.S. Yoo (2011) A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul 4: 125-136.
  7. Castaings, M., P. Cawley, R. Farlow, G. Hayward (1998) Single sided inspection of composite materials using air coupled ultrasound. J Nondest Eval 17: 37-45.
    External Resources
  8. Chu, P.-C., H.-L. Liu, H.-Y. Lai, C.-Y. Lin, H.-C. Tsai, Y.-C. Pei (2015) Neuromodulation accompanying focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Sci Rep 5: 15477.
  9. Clement, G. (2004) Perspectives in clinical uses of high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasonics 42: 1087-1093.
  10. Clement, G., K. Hynynen (2002) A non-invasive method for focusing ultrasound through the human skull. Phys Med Biol 47: 1219.
  11. Clement, G.T., P.J. White, R.L. King, N. McDannold, K. Hynynen (2005) A magnetic resonance imaging-compatible, large-scale array for trans-skull ultrasound surgery and therapy. J Ultrasound Med 24: 1117-1125.
    External Resources
  12. Colucci, V., G. Strichartz, F. Jolesz, N. Vykhodtseva, K. Hynynen (2009) Focused ultrasound effects on nerve action potential in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 35: 1737-1747.
  13. Dalecki, D. (2004) Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6: 229-248.
  14. Davis, C.M., A.Y. Ammi, N.J. Alkayed, S. Kaul (2015) Ultrasound stimulates formation and release of vasoactive compounds in brain endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 309: H583-H591.
  15. Deng, Z.-D., S.H. Lisanby, A.V. Peterchev (2013) Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimul 6: 1-13.
  16. Dinno, M., M. Dyson, S. Young, A. Mortimer, J. Hart, L. Crum (1989) The significance of membrane changes in the safe and effective use of therapeutic and diagnostic ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 34: 1543.
  17. Dyson, M., J. Pond, B. Woodward, J. Broadbent (1974) The production of blood cell stasis and endothelial damage in the blood vessels of chick embryos treated with ultrasound in a stationary wave field. Ultrasound Med Biol 1: 133-148.
  18. Fan, Z., H. Liu, M. Mayer, C.X. Deng (2012) Spatiotemporally controlled single cell sonoporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 16486-16491.
  19. Foley, J.L., S. Vaezy, L.A. Crum (2007) Applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound in medicine: spotlight on neurological applications. Appl Acoust 68: 245-259.
    External Resources
  20. Focused Ultrasound Foundation (2014) Neuromodulation Workshop White Paper. Charlottesville, 2014.
  21. Fox, M.D., R.L. Buckner, H. Liu, M.M. Chakravarty, A.M. Lozano, A. Pascual-Leone (2014) Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: E4367-E4375.
  22. Fry, F., H. Ades, W. Fry (1958) Production of reversible changes in the central nervous system by ultrasound. Science 127: 83-84.
  23. Fry, W., V. Wulff, D. Tucker, F. Fry (1950) Physical factors involved in ultrasonically induced changes in living systems: I. Identification of non-temperature effects. J Acoust Soc Am 22: 867-876.
    External Resources
  24. Fry, W.J., F. Fry, J. Barnard, R. Krumins, J. Brennan (1955) Ultrasonic lesions in mammalian central nervous system. Science 122: 1091-1091.
  25. Furness, J. (2000) Types of neurons in the enteric nervous system. J Auton Nerv Syst 81: 87-96.
  26. Garcia, L., G. D'Alessandro, B. Bioulac, C. Hammond (2005) High-frequency stimulation in Parkinson's disease: more or less? Trends Neurosci 28: 209-216.
  27. Guthkelch, A., L. Carter, J. Cassady, K. Hynynen, R. Iacono, P. Johnson, E. Obbens, R. Roemer, J. Seeger, D. Shimm (1991) Treatment of malignant brain tumors with focused ultrasound hyperthermia and radiation: results of a phase I trial. J Neurooncol 10: 271-284.
  28. Harvey, E.N. (1929) The effect of high frequency sound waves on heart muscle and other irritable tissues. Am J Physiol 91: 284-290.
  29. Harvey, E.N., A.L. Loomis (1928) High frequency sound waves of small intensity and their biological effects. Nature 121: 622-624.
    External Resources
  30. Hayner, M., K. Hynynen (2001) Numerical analysis of ultrasonic transmission and absorption of oblique plane waves through the human skull. J Acoust Soc Am 110: 3319-3330.
  31. Hynynen, K., W.R. Freund, H.E. Cline, A.H. Chung, R.D. Watkins, J.P. Vetro, F.A. Jolesz (1996) A clinical, noninvasive, MR imaging-monitored ultrasound surgery method. Radiographics 16: 185-195.
  32. Hynynen, K., F.A. Jolesz (1998) Demonstration of potential noninvasive ultrasound brain therapy through an intact skull. Ultrasound Med Biol 24: 275-283.
  33. Ibsen, S., A. Tong, C. Schutt, S. Esener, S.H. Chalasani (2015) Sonogenetics is a non-invasive approach to activating neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun 6: 8264.
  34. Iyer, S., W.B. Saunders, S. Stemkowski (2009) Economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with colectomy in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm 15: 485-494.
  35. Jalali, S., Y. Huang, D.J. Dumont, K. Hynynen (2010) Focused ultrasound-mediated bbb disruption is associated with an increase in activation of AKT: experimental study in rats. BMC Neurol 10: 114.
  36. Johns, L.D. (2002) Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis. J Athl Train 37: 293.
    External Resources
  37. Johnson, M.D., H.H. Lim, T.I. Netoff, A.T. Connolly, N. Johnson, A. Roy, A. Holt, K.O. Lim, J.R. Carey, J.L. Vitek (2013) Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities. Trans Biomed Eng 60: 610-624.
  38. Joyner, C.R., J.M. Reid, J.P. Bond (1963) Reflected ultrasound in the assessment of mitral valve disease. Circulation 27: 503-511.
  39. Jun, S.B. (2012) Ultrasound as a noninvasive neuromodulation tool. Biomed Eng Lett 2: 8-12.
    External Resources
  40. Kennedy, J.E., F. Wu, G.R. ter Haar, F.V. Gleeson, R.R. Phillips, M.R. Middleton, D. Cranston (2004) High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of liver tumours. Ultrasonics 42: 931-935.
  41. Kim, H., A. Chiu, S.D. Lee, K. Fischer, S.-S. Yoo (2014) Focused ultrasound-mediated non-invasive brain stimulation: examination of sonication parameters. Brain Stim 7: 748-756.
  42. Kim, H., S.J. Taghados, K. Fischer, L.-S. Maeng, S. Park, S.-S. Yoo (2012) Noninvasive transcranial stimulation of rat abducens nerve by focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 38: 1568-1575.
  43. King, R.L., J.R. Brown, W.T. Newsome, K.B. Pauly (2013) Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 39: 312-331.
  44. Klibanov, A.L. (2005) Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. Bioconjug Chem 16: 9-17.
  45. Krasovitski, B., V. Frenkel, S. Shoham, E. Kimmel (2011) Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 3258-3263.
  46. Legon, W., T.F. Sato, A. Opitz, J. Mueller, A. Barbour, A. Williams, W.J. Tyler (2014) Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat Neurosci 17: 322-329.
  47. Li, J., W. Chang, J. Lin, R. Ruaan, H. Liu, J. Sun (2003) Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to ultrasound stimulation. Biomaterials 24: 2379-2385.
  48. Lin, Z., I. Sarosiek, R.W. McCallum (2007) Gastrointestinal electrical stimulation for treatment of gastrointestinal disorders: gastroparesis, obesity, fecal incontinence, and constipation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 36: 713-734.
  49. Lynn, J.G., R.L. Zwemer, A.J. Chick (1942) The biological applications of focused ultrasonic waves. Science (New York) 96: 119-120.
  50. Manlapaz, J., K. Åström, H. Ballantine, P. Lele (1964) Effects of ultrasonic radiation in experimental focal epilepsy in the cat. Exp Neurol 10: 345-356.
  51. Mihran, R.T., F.S. Barnes, H. Wachtel (1990) Temporally-specific modification of myelinated axon excitability in vitro following a single ultrasound pulse. Ultrasound Med Biol 16: 297-309.
  52. Min, B.-K., A. Bystritsky, K.-I. Jung, K. Fischer, Y. Zhang, L.-S. Maeng, S.I. Park, Y.-A. Chung, F.A. Jolesz, S.-S. Yoo (2011) Focused ultrasound-mediated suppression of chemically-induced acute epileptic EEG activity. BMC Neurosci 12: 23.
  53. Morris, C.E., P.F. Juranka (2007) Lipid stress at play: mechanosensitivity of voltage-gated channels. Curr Top Membr 59: 297-338.
  54. Mourad, P.D., D.A. Lazar, F.P. Curra, B.C. Mohr, K.C. Andrus, A. Avellino, L.D. McNutt, L.A. Crum, M. Kliot (2001) Ultrasound accelerates functional recovery after peripheral nerve damage. Neurosurgery 48: 1136-1141.
  55. Mueller, J., W. Legon, A. Opitz, T.F. Sato, W.J. Tyler (2014) Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates intrinsic and evoked EEG dynamics. Brain Stimul 7: 900-908.
  56. Okamoto, K., D.P. Martin, J.D. Schmelzer, Y. Mitsui, P.A. Low (2001) Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene expression in rat sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. Exp Neurol 169: 386-391.
  57. Papadakis, E.P. (1999) Ultrasonic Instruments and Devices: Reference for Modern Instrumentation, Techniques, and Technology. Berlin, Springer Science and Business.
  58. Park, S.C., S.H. Oh, T.B. Seo, U. Namgung, J.M. Kim, J.H. Lee (2010) Ultrasound-stimulated peripheral nerve regeneration within asymmetrically porous PLGA/Pluronic F127 nerve guide conduit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 94: 359-366.
  59. Plaksin, M., S. Shoham, E. Kimmel (2014) Intramembrane cavitation as a predictive bio-piezoelectric mechanism for ultrasonic brain stimulation. Phys Rev X 4: 011004.
    External Resources
  60. Poole, D., J. Furness (2012) Enteric nervous system structure and neurochemistry related to function and neuropathology; in Johnson, L. (ed): Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, ed 5. New York, Academic Press, pp. 557-581.
  61. Schmidt, D., J. del Mármol, R. MacKinnon (2012) Mechanistic basis for low threshold mechanosensitivity in voltage-dependent K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 10352-10357.
  62. Schneider-Kolsky, M.E., Z. Ayobi, P. Lombardo, D. Brown, B. Kedang, M.E. Gibbs (2009) Ultrasound exposure of the foetal chick brain: effects on learning and memory. Int J Dev Neurosci 27: 677-683.
  63. Shealy, C.N., E. Henneman (1962) Reversible effects of ultrasound on spinal reflexes. Arch Neurol 6: 374-386.
  64. Sirsi, S., M. Borden (2009) Microbubble compositions, properties and biomedical applications. Bubble Sci Eng Technol 1: 3-17.
  65. Sukharev, S., D.P. Corey (2004) Mechanosensitive channels: multiplicity of families and gating paradigms. Sci STKE 2004: re4.
  66. Sundaram, J., B.R. Mellein, S. Mitragotri (2003) An experimental and theoretical analysis of ultrasound-induced permeabilization of cell membranes. Biophys J 84: 3087-3101.
  67. Thompson, D.M., A.N. Koppes, J.G. Hardy, C.E. Schmidt (2014) Electrical stimuli in the central nervous system microenvironment. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16: 397-430.
  68. Tsirulnikov, E., I. Vartanyan, G. Gersuni, A. Rosenblyum, V. Pudov, L. Gavrilov (1988) Use of amplitude-modulated focused ultrasound for diagnosis of hearing disorders. Ultrasound Med Biol 14: 277-285.
  69. Tsuang, Y.H., L.W. Liao, Y.H. Chao, J.S. Sun, C.K. Cheng, M.H. Chen, P.W. Weng (2011) Effects of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on rat Schwann cells metabolism. Artif Organs 35: 373-383.
  70. Tsui, P.-H., S.-H. Wang, C.-C. Huang (2005) In vitro effects of ultrasound with different energies on the conduction properties of neural tissue. Ultrasonics 43: 560-565.
  71. Tufail, Y., A. Matyushov, N. Baldwin, M.L. Tauchmann, J. Georges, A. Yoshihiro, S.I. Tillery, W.J. Tyler (2010) Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron 66: 681-694.
  72. Tufail, Y., A. Yoshihiro, S. Pati, M.M. Li, W.J. Tyler (2011) Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound. Nat Protocol 6: 1453-1470.
  73. Tyler, W.J. (2011) Noninvasive neuromodulation with ultrasound? A continuum mechanics hypothesis. Neuroscientist 17: 25-36.
  74. Tyler, W.J. (2012) The mechanobiology of brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 867-878.
  75. Tyler, W.J., Y. Tufail, M. Finsterwald, M.L. Tauchmann, E.J. Olson, C. Majestic (2008) Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound. PLoS One 3: e3511.
  76. Velling, V., S. Shklyaruk (1988) Modulation of the functional state of the brain with the aid of focused ultrasonic action. Neurosci Behav Physiol 18: 369-375.
  77. Venkatachalam, K., C. Montell (2007) TRP channels. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 387.
  78. Vykhodtseva, N., V. Sorrentino, F.A. Jolesz, R.T. Bronson, K. Hynynen (2000) MRI detection of the thermal effects of focused ultrasound on the brain. Ultrasound Med Biol 26: 871-880.
  79. White, P., G. Clement, K. Hynynen (2006) Local frequency dependence in transcranial ultrasound transmission. Phys Med Biol 51: 2293.
  80. Wild, J.J., J.M. Reid (1952) Further pilot echographic studies on the histologic structure of tumors of the living intact human breast. Am J Pathol 28: 839.
    External Resources
  81. Wright, C.J., J. Rothwell, N. Saffari (2015) Ultrasonic stimulation of peripheral nervous tissue: an investigation into mechanisms. J Phys 581: 012003.
    External Resources
  82. Ziskin, M.C. (1993) Fundamental physics of ultrasound and its propagation in tissue. Radiographics 13: 705-709.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Review

Accepted: May 08, 2016
Published online: October 05, 2016
Issue release date: October 2016

Number of Print Pages: 19
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1422-6405 (Print)
eISSN: 1422-6421 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CTO


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.