Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Introduction

Editor's Choice - Free Access

Special Issue: Slavic Perspectives on Prosody

Malisz Z.a · Żygis M.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Speech, Music and Hearing, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden; bCentre for General Linguistics and Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Corresponding Author

Zofia Malisz

Department of Speech, Music and Hearing

KTH

SE-10044 Stockholm (Sweden)

E-Mail malisz@kth.se

Related Articles for ""

Phonetica 2016;73:155-162

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.




First-Page Preview
Abstract of Introduction

References

  1. Anderson SR (1985): Phonology in the twentieth century: theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  2. Andreeva B, Barry W, Wolska M (2012): Language differences in the perceptual weight of prominence-lending properties; in Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2012, Portland, OR. International Speech Communication Association, pp 2426-2429.
  3. Andreeva B, Koreman J, Barry W (this volume): Local and global cues in the prosodic realization of broad and narrow focus in Bulgarian. Phonetica.
  4. Andreeva B, Möbius B, Demenko G, Zimmerer F, Jügler J (2015): Linguistic measures of pitch range in Slavic and Germanic languages; in Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2015, Dresden. International Speech Communication Association, pp 968-972.
  5. Andreeva B, Oliver D (2005): Information structure in Polish and Bulgarian: accent types and peak alignment in broad and narrow focus. Formal Approaches Slavic Linguist 13:1-13.
  6. Arvaniti A (2009): Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica 66:46-63.
  7. Arvaniti A, Ladd DR (2009): Greek wh-question and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26:43-74.
  8. Arvaniti A, Ladd RD (2015): Underspecification in intonation revisited: a reply to Xu, Lee, Prom-on and Liu. Phonology 32:537-541.
  9. Arvaniti A, Żygis M, Jaskuła M (this volume): The phonetics and phonology of Polish calling melodies. Phonetica.
  10. Barry WJ, Andreeva B, Russo M, Dimitrova S, Kostadinova T, et al (2003): Do rhythm measures tell us anything about language type? Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp 2693-2696.
  11. Beňuš Š (2012): Phonetic variation in Slovak yer and non-yer vowels. J Phonet 40:535-549.
  12. Beňuš Š, Šimko J (2012): Rhythm and tempo in Slovak. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Chicago, pp 502-505.
  13. Beňuš Š, Šimko J (this volume): Stability and variability in Slovak prosodic boundaries. Phonetica.
  14. Bethin CY (2000): Slavic phonology in the United States. SLING2K Workshop Position Paper. http://www.indiana. edu/∼slavconf/SLING2K/pospapers/bethin.pdf.
  15. Bethin CY (2006): Stress and tone in East Slavic dialects. Phonology 23:125-156.
  16. Comrie B, Corbett G (2003): The Slavonic Languages. Abingdon, Routledge.
  17. Crosswhite K (2003): Spectral tilt as a cue to stress in Polish, Macedonian and Bulgarian. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp 767-770.
  18. Cruttenden A (2006): The de-accenting of given information: a cognitive universal? Empir Approaches Language Typol 20:311.
  19. Cummins F (2002): Speech rhythm and rhythmic taxonomy. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, pp 121-126.
  20. Dankovičová J, Dellwo V (2007): Czech speech rhythm and the rhythm class hypothesis. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, pp 1241-1244.
  21. Dogil G, Williams B (1999): The phonetic manifestation of word stress; in van der Hulst H (ed): Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 273-311.
  22. Domahs U, Knaus J, Orzechowska P, Wiese R (2012): Stress deafness in a language with fixed word stress: an ERP study on Polish. Front Psychol 3:1-15.
  23. Duběda T, Keller E (2005): Microprosodic aspects of vowel dynamics - an acoustic study of French, English and Czech. J Phonet 33:447-464.
  24. Duběda T, Votrubec J (2005): Acoustic analysis of Czech stress: intonation, duration and intensity revisited; in Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2005, Lisbon. International Speech Communication Association, pp 1429-1432.
  25. Erikson Y, Alstermark M (1972): Fundamental frequency correlates of the grave word accent in Swedish: the effect of vowel duration. Speech Transm Lab Q Papers Status Rep, pp 2-3.
  26. Gibbon D, Klessa K, Bachan J (2014): Duration and speed of speech events: a selection of methods. Lingua Posnaniensis 56:59-83.
  27. Godjevac S (2000a): An Autosegmental/Metrical Analysis of Serbo-Croatian Intonation. Working Papers in Linguistics. Columbus, Ohio State University Department of Linguistics, pp 79-142.
  28. Godjevac S (2000b): Intonation, Word Order and Focus Projection in Serbo-Croatian; PhD thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  29. Godjevac S (2005): Transcribing Serbo-Croatian Intonation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 146-171.
  30. Gordeeva O, Mennen I, Scobbie JM (2003): Vowel duration and spectral balance in Scottish English and Russian. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp 3193-3196.
  31. Grabe E (1998): Pitch accent realization in English and German. J Phonet 26:129-143.
  32. Halle M (2001): On accent, stress and quantity in West Slavic. Lingua 111:791-810.
  33. Howson P (2015): An acoustic examination of the three-way sibilant contrast in Lower Sorbian; in Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2015, Dresden. International Speech Communication Association, pp 2670-2674.
  34. Iskarous K, Kavitskaya D (2010): The interaction between contrast, prosody, and coarticulation in structuring phonetic variability. J Phonet 38:625-639.
  35. Jasinskaja K (2013): Information structure in Slavic; in Féry C, Ishihara S (eds): OUP Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  36. Karpiński M (2012): Acoustic properties and functions of phrase-final rises in Polish task oriented dialogues. Speech Lang Technol 14/15:147-156.
  37. Kavitskaya D (2006): Perceptual salience and palatalization in Russian. Lab Phonol 8:589-610.
  38. Kelso JS, Tuller B (1983): Compensatory articulation under conditions of reduced afferent information: a dynamic formulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 26:217-224.
  39. Kharlamov V (2014): Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in wordfinal obstruents in Russian: phonological, lexical, and methodological influences. J Phonet 43:47-56.
  40. Kochetov A (2006): Testing licensing by cue: a case of Russian palatalized coronals. Phonetica 63:113-148.
  41. Kochetov A (2013): Production, Perception, and Phonotactic Patterns: A Case of Contrastive Palatalization. Abingdon, Routledge.
  42. Kohler KJ (2012): Bridging the segment-prosody divide in speech production and perception. Phonetica 69:5-6.
  43. Kraska-Szlenk I (1995): The Phonology of Stress in Polish; PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  44. Ladd DR (2008): Intonational Phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  45. Lewis MP, Simons GF, Fennig CD (eds) (2014): Ethnologue: Languages of the World, ed 17. Dallas, SIL International.
  46. Luchkina T, Cole J, (this volume): Structural and referent-based effects on prosodic expression in Russian. Phonetica.
  47. Malisz Z (2013): Speech Rhythm Variability in Polish and English: A Study of Interaction between Rhythmic Levels; PhD thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
  48. Malisz Z, O'Dell M, Nieminen T, Wagner P (this volume): Modeling the speech rhythm of Polish with coupled oscillators. Phonetica.
  49. Malisz Z, Wagner P (2012): Acoustic-phonetic realisation of Polish syllable prominence: a corpus study. Speech Lang Technol 14/15:105-114.
  50. Malisz Z, Żygis M, Pompino-Marschall B (2013): Rhythmic structure effects on glottalisation: a study of different speech styles in Polish and German. Lab Phonol 4:119-158.
  51. Mitrovič I (2012): A phonetically natural vs native language pattern: an experimental study of velar palatalization in Serbian. J Slavic Linguist 20:229-268.
  52. Mücke D, Grice M, Cho T (2014): More than a magic moment - paving the way for dynamics of articulation and prosodic structure. J Phonet 44:1-7.
  53. Newlin-Łukowicz L (2012): Polish stress: looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system. Phonology 29:271-329.
  54. Nowak P (2006): The role of vowel transitions and frication noise in the perception of Polish sibilants. J Phonet 34:139-152.
  55. Odé C (2003): Description and transcription of Russian intonation (ToRI). Stud Slavic Gen Linguist 30:279-288.
  56. O'Dell ML, Nieminen T (2009): Coupled oscillator model for speech timing: overview and examples; in Nordic Prosody: Proceedings of the 10th Conference. Helsinki, Lang, pp 179-190.
  57. Ordin M (2011): Palatalization and intrinsic prosodic vowel features in Russian. Lang Speech 54:547-568.
  58. Pastätter M, Pouplier M (2013): Temporal coordination of sibilants in Polish onset clusters. J Acoust Soc Am 134:4201.
  59. Peperkamp S, Vendelin I, Dupoux E (2010): Perception of predictable stress: a cross-linguistic investigation. J Phonet 38:422-430.
  60. Pouplier M, Beňuš Š (2011): On the phonetic status of syllabic consonants: evidence from Slovak. Lab Phonol 2:243-273.
  61. Ramus F (2002): Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: perspectives. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, pp 115-120.
  62. Rathcke T (2013): On the neutralizing status of truncation in intonation: a perception study of boundary tones in German and Russian. J Phonet 41:172-185.
  63. Rathcke TV (2009): Komparative Phonetik und Phonologie der Intonationssysteme des Deutschen und Russischen. Munich, Utz, vol. 29.
  64. Rathcke TV (this volume): How truncating are ‘truncating languages': evidence from Russian and German. Phonetica.
  65. Ringen C, Kulikov V (2012): Voicing in Russian stops: cross-linguistic implications. J Slavic Linguist 20:269-286.
  66. Rubach J (2013): Exceptional segments in Polish. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 31:1139-1162.
  67. Rusko M, Sabo R, Dzúr M (2007): Sk-ToBI scheme for phonological prosody annotation in Slovak; in Král P, Matoušek V (eds): Text, Speech and Dialogue. Berlin, Springer, pp 334-341.
  68. Sawicka I (2001): An Outline of the Phonetic Typology of the Slavic Languages. Toruń, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu M. Kopernika.
  69. Smiljanić R (2013): Lexical, Pragmatic, and Positional Effects on Prosody in Two Dialects of Croatian and Serbian: An Acoustic Study. Abingdon, Routledge.
  70. Strycharczuk P (2012): Sonorant transparency and the complexity of voicing in Polish. J Phonet 40:655-671.
  71. Volín J, Weingartová L, Niebuhr·(this volume): The prosody of the Czech discourse marker ‘jasně': an analysis of forms and functions. Phonetica.
  72. Wagner A (2008): A Comprehensive Model of Intonation for Application in Speech Synthesis; PhD thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
  73. Wagner A (2014): Description of Polish speech rhythm using rhythm metrics and the time-delay approach: a comparative study. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, pp 366-370.
  74. Wagner P, Trouvain J, Zimmerer F (2015): In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research. J Phonet 48:1-12.
  75. Wiget L, White L, Schuppler B, Grenon I, Rauch O, Mattys SL (2010): How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm? J Acoust Soc Am 127:1559-1569.
  76. Xu Y (2010): In defense of lab speech. J Phonet 38:329-336.
  77. Xu Y, Lee A, Prom-on S, Liu F (2015): Explaining the PENTA model: a reply to Arvaniti and Ladd. Phonology 32:505-535.
  78. Żygis M, Padgett J (2010): A perceptual study of Polish fricatives, and its implications for historical sound change. J Phonet 38:207-226.
  79. Żygis M, Pape D, Jesus LM, Jaskuła M (2014): Intended intonation of statement and polar questions in Polish whispered, semi-whispered and normal speech modes. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, pp 678-682.

Article / Publication Details

Published online: February 23, 2017
Issue release date: February 2017

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0031-8388 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0321 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PHO


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.