European Urology
Clinical Paper
Upper Tract Urothelial Tumor after Transurethral Resection for Bladder TumorPalou J. · Fariña L.A. · Villavicencio H. · Vicente J.Instituto de Urologia, Nefrologia y Andrologia, Fundación Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Subscribe
For eJournal Archive and eJournal Backfiles information please contact Karger service
Article / Publication Details
Published online: August 11, 2017
Issue release date: 1992
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0302-2838 (Print)
eISSN: 1873-7560 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/EUR
Abstract
We present a retrospective review of 30 patients who developed upper urinary tract tumors (UUTT) after having been diagnosed and treated for a bladder neoplasm. The mean patient age was 63 years (range 54-72). An average of 4.8 (range 1-10) transurethral resections (TUR) had been performed for bladder cancer prior to the appearance of UUTT. The length of time elapsed between the initial bladder TUR and the subsequent diagnosis of UUTT was variable, with increased incidence in the first 24-72 months (63.3% of the cases). In 21 cases (70%) the bladder tumor was multiple and in 28 (93.3%) the tumor was recurrent. In those patients with unilateral vesicoureteral reflux, an increased incidence of UUTT was found in the refluxing renal unit. In patients with poorly differentiated (grade 3 and grade 2-3) bladder tumors, UUTT was of the similar grade of anaplasia in 75% of cases. These observations, together with those previously published in the literature, allow us to recommend the use of excretory urography (IVP) every 2 years during the first 6 years of follow-up in patients treated for recurrent and/or multiple bladder tumor. Thereafter, follow-up would depend upon the individual clinical situation.
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Published online: August 11, 2017
Issue release date: 1992
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0302-2838 (Print)
eISSN: 1873-7560 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/EUR
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
Get Permission