Acute Phase Predictors of Subsequent Psychosocial Burden in Carers of Elderly Stroke PatientsThommessen B. · Wyller T.B. · Bautz-Holter E. · Laake K.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
The objective was to describe the psychosocial burden experienced by informal carers of elderly stroke victims, and to identify its predictors among baseline characteristics of the patients. From a prospective study of 171 elderly stroke patients admitted to a geriatric ward for rehabilitation in the acute phase, 68 patients living at home with a primary caregiver were identified 6 months after the stroke. At baseline, all the patients were assessed with respect to motor function, cognitive function, global handicap and activities of daily living, and after 6 months the caregivers were assessed, using the Relatives’ Stress Scale. According to this, the most frequent impacts were worries that an accident might befall their relatives, that they had to reorganise their household routines and further, that their social life and ability to take holidays had been reduced. Impaired cognitive function was the only baseline patient characteristic that predicted a subsequent psychosocial burden on the carer. Special attention should be paid to elderly stroke patients initially assessed with impaired cognitive function and their caregivers.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Greveson GC, Gray CS, French JM, James OF: Long-term outcome for patients and carers following hospital admission for stroke. Age Ageing 1991;20:337–344.
- Dennis M, O’Rourke S, Lewis S, Sharpe M, Warlow C: A quantitative study of the emotional outcome of people caring for stroke survivors. Stroke 1998;29:1867–1872.
- Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG: A population-based assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1995;26:843–849.
Carnwath TC, Johnson DA: Psychiatric morbidity among spouses of patients with stroke. BMJ 1987;294:409–411.
- Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Haan RJ, Rijnders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos GA: The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1998;29:1605–1611.
- Braekhus A, Oksengard AR, Engedal K, Laake K: Social and depressive stress suffered by spouses of patients with mild dementia. Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16:242–246.
Thompson C, Thompson G: Support for carers of people with Alzheimer’s type dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1999;4:4.
- Han B, Haley WE: Family caregiving for patients with stroke: Review and analysis. Stroke 1999;30:1478–1485.
Montgomery RJV, Gonyea JG, Hooyman NR: Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden. Fam Relations 1985;34:19–26.
- Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM: Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist 1990;30:583–594.
- Greene JG, Smith R, Gardiner M, Timbury GC: Measuring behavioural disturbance of elderly demented patients in the community and its effects on relatives: A factor analytic study. Age Ageing 1982;11:121–126.
- Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Young HM, Becker J, Maiuro RD: The screen for caregiver burden. Gerontologist 1991;31:76–83.
- Schofield HL, Murphy B, Herrman HE, Bloch S, Singh B: Family caregiving: Measurement of emotional well-being and various aspects of the caregiving role. Psychol Med 1997;27:647–657.
- Mahoney FI, Barthel D: Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
- Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state’: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
- Sodring KM, Bautz-Holter E, Ljunggren AE, Wyller TB: Description and validation of a test of motor function and activities in stroke patients: The Sodring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients. Scan J Rehabil Med 1995;27:211–217.
- de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, van der Meulen J, Aaronson N: The clinical meaning of Ranking ‘handicap’ grades after stroke. Stroke 1995;26:2027–2030.
Dixon W: BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1992.
Dunn G, Everitt B, Pickles A: Modelling Covariances and Latent Variables using EQS. London, Chapman & Hall, 1993.
Hodgson SP, Wood V, Langton-Hewer R: Identification of stroke carers ‘at risk’: A preliminary study of the predictors of carers’ psychological well-being at one year post stroke. Clin Rehabil 1996;10:337–346.
- Bugge CRN, Alexander H, Hagen S: Stroke patients’ informal caregivers: Patient, caregiver, and service factors that affect caregiver strain. Stroke 1999;30:1517–1523.
- Robinson BC: Validation of a caregiver strain index. J Gerontol 1983;38:344–348.
- Baumgarten M, Battista RN, Infante-Rivard C, Hanley JA, Becker R, Gauthier S: The psychological and physical health of family members caring for an elderly person with dementia. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:61–70.
- Jeffery DR, Good DC: Rehabilitation of the stroke patient. Curr Opin Neurol 1995;8:62–68.
- Wyller TB: Rehabilitation of stroke patients: Does it have an effect? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1995;115:1743–1747.
- Draper BM, Poulos CJ, Cole AM, Poulos RG, Ehrlich F: A comparison of caregivers for elderly stroke and dementia victims. Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:896–901.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.