Pediatric Neurosurgery
Original Paper
The Role of Age and Initial Deformation on Final Cranial Asymmetry in Infants with Plagiocephaly Treated with Helmet TherapyMackel C.E.a · Bonnar M.b · Keeny H.c · Lipa B.M.c · Hwang S.W.caDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center and Floating Hospital for Children, and bThe Orthotic and Prosthetic Center of Boston, Boston, MA, and cShriners Hospitals for Children - Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Keywords: PlagiocephalyOrthoticsHelmet |
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: March 07, 2017
Accepted: July 07, 2017
Published online: August 30, 2017
Issue release date: September 2017
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 1016-2291 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0305 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PNE
Abstract
Background/Aims: To characterize the impact of cranial asymmetry and age at initiation of therapy on final cranial asymmetry in infants with deformational plagiocephaly treated with helmet orthotics. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 45 pediatric patients <12 months of age with deformational plagiocephaly who underwent STARband cranial orthotic helmet treatment. Cranial asymmetry was measured using a 3-dimensional laser surface scanner and defined as a cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) >3.5%. Results: Twenty-one patients (47%) were <6 months of age at the start of helmet therapy. A greater initial CVAI or age at therapy initiation correlated with a greater final CVAI (univariate analysis, r = 0.53, p < 0.001; r = 0.42, p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis of 18 patients beginning therapy at 4-5 months of age and 20 patients beginning therapy at 6-8 months of age revealed that only a change in the initial CVAI was associated with a change in the final CVAI (r = 0.43, p = 0.007). Conclusion: In a comparison of patients who initiated helmet therapy at 4-5 and 6-8 months of age, only cranial asymmetry at the outset of therapy was correlated with final cranial asymmetry (r = 0.43, p = 0.007).
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
-
Looman WS, Flannery AB: Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly. 1. Assessment and diagnosis. J Pediatr Health Care 2012;26:242-250; quiz 251-243.
-
Rogers GF: Deformational plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and scaphocephaly. 1. Terminology, diagnosis, and etiopathogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:9-16.
-
Boere-Boonekamp MM, van der Linden-Kuiper LT: Positional preference: prevalence in infants and follow-up after two years. Pediatrics 2001;107:339-343.
-
Flannery AB, Looman WS, Kemper K: Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly. Management. J Pediatr Health Care 2012;26:320-331.
-
Guo S, Roche AF, Moore WM: Reference data for head circumference and 1-month increments from 1 to 12 months of age. J Pediatr 1988;113:490-494.
-
Kluba S, Kraut W, Reinert S, Krimmel M: What is the optimal time to start helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly? Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:492-498.
-
Teichgraeber JF, Seymour-Dempsey K, Baumgartner JE, Xia JJ, Waller AL, Gateno J: Molding helmet therapy in the treatment of brachycephaly and plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:118-123.
-
Carson BS, Muñoz D, Gross G, VanderKolk CA, James CS, Gates J, North M, McKnight M, Guarnieri M: An assistive device for the treatment of positional plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 2000;11:177-183.
-
Yoo HS, Rah DK, Kim YO: Outcome analysis of cranial molding therapy in nonsynostotic plagiocephaly. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:338-344.
-
Mulliken JB, Vander Woude DL, Hansen M, LaBrie RA, Scott MR: Analysis of posterior plagiocephaly: deformational versus synostotic. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:371-380.
-
Freudlsperger C, Steinmacher S, Saure D, Bodem JP, Kuhle R, Hoffmann J, Engel M: Impact of severity and therapy onset on helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:110-115.
-
Lee MC, Hwang J, Kim YO, Shim KW, Park EK, Lew DH, Yun IS: Three-dimensional analysis of cranial and facial asymmetry after helmet therapy for positional plagiocephaly. Childs Nerv Syst 2015;31:1113-1120.
-
Graham JM, Gomez M, Halberg A, Earl DL, Kreutzman JT, Cui J, Guo X: Management of deformational plagiocephaly: repositioning versus orthotic therapy. J Pediatr 2005;146:258-262.
-
Thompson JT, David LR, Wood B, Argenta A, Simpson J, Argenta LC: Outcome analysis of helmet therapy for positional plagiocephaly using a three-dimensional surface scanning laser. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:362-365.
-
Steinberg JP, Rawlani R, Humphries LS, Rawlani V, Vicari FA: Effectiveness of conservative therapy and helmet therapy for positional cranial deformation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:833-842.
-
Kelly KM, Littlefield TR, Pomatto JK, Ripley CE, Beals SP, Joganic EF: Importance of early recognition and treatment of deformational plagiocephaly with orthotic cranioplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:127-130.
-
Seruya M, Oh AK, Taylor JH, Sauerhammer TM, Rogers GF: Helmet treatment of deformational plagiocephaly: the relationship between age at initiation and rate of correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:55e-61e.
-
Couture DE, Crantford JC, Somasundaram A, Sanger C, Argenta AE, David LR: Efficacy of passive helmet therapy for deformational plagiocephaly: report of 1,050 cases. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35:E4.
-
Vles J, Colla C, Weber J, Beuls E, Wilmink J, Kingma H: Helmet versus nonhelmet treatment in nonsynostotic positional posterior plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 2000;11:572-574.
Article / Publication Details
Received: March 07, 2017
Accepted: July 07, 2017
Published online: August 30, 2017
Issue release date: September 2017
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 1016-2291 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0305 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PNE
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission