Gastrointestinal Tumors
Review
Network Meta-Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy following Resection of Colorectal Liver MetastasesGavriilidis P.a · Tobias A.b · Sutcliffe R.P.a · Azoulay D.c · Roberts K.J.aaDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
bBiostatistician in the Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain cDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France |
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: May 09, 2018
Accepted: June 05, 2018
Published online: July 25, 2018
Issue release date: September 2018
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 6
Number of Tables: 1
ISSN: 2296-3774 (Print)
eISSN: 2296-3766 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GAT
Abstract
Objective: Six principal adjuvant chemotherapy treatments (ACTs) are currently available for patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the optimal ACT, as evaluated by 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as well as by hepatic recurrences and adverse events (AEs). Methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. The probability of the optimal therapeutic scheme and the mean ranking were estimated for each treatment using network meta-analysis. Results: Systemic chemotherapy (SCT) had the best 2-year DFS rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48–1.27, 95% prediction interval [PI] = 0.17–3.56, surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] = 73) and the lowest AE rate (estimated SUCRA = 65 and predicted SUCRA = 62). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus SCT had the best 5-year OS rate (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64–1.01, 95% PI = 0.50–1.29) and the lowest hepatic recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56–5.30, 95% PI = 0.61–13.62). Conclusion: Both SCT and HAI plus SCT showed superior efficacy and safety. Clinical trials in homogeneous populations with strict selection criteria are needed to compare these two ACTs.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
-
Fong Y, Forthner JG, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH: Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 309–318.
-
Fong Y, Cohen M, Forthner JG, Enker WE, Turnbull AD, Goit DG, et al: Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 938–946.
-
Lorenz ML, Müller HH, Schramm H, Gassel HJ, Rau HG, Ridwelski K, et al: Randomized trial of surgery versus surgery followed by adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 756–762.
-
Rudroff C, Altendorf-Hoffmann A, Stangl R, Scheele J: Prospective randomised trial on adjuvant hepatic-artery infusion chemotherapy after R0 resection of colorectal liver metastases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1999; 384: 243–249.
-
Tono T, Hasuike Y, Ohzato H, Takatsuka Y, Kikkawa N: Limited but definite efficacy of prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases: a randomized study. Cancer 2000; 88: 1549–1556.
-
Kemeny NE, Huang Y, Cohen AM, Shu WS, Conti JA, Brennan MF, et al: Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 2039–2048.
-
Kemeny MM, Adak S, Gray B, Macdonald JS, Smith T, Lipitz S, et al: Combined modality treatment for resectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver: surgical resection of hepatic metastases in combination with continuous infusion of chemotherapy – an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1499–1505.
-
Kemeny NE, Jarnagin WR, Capanu M, Fong Y, Gewirtz AN, De Matteo RP, et al: Randomized phase II trial of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 29: 884–889.
-
Bolton JS, O’Connell MJ, Mahoney MR, Farr GH Jr, Fitch TR, Maples WJ, et al: Hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy after multiple metastasectomy in patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II study, 92-46-52. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2012; 11: 31–37.
-
Kusano M, Honda M, Okayabashi K, Akimanu K, Kino S, Tsuji Y, et al: Randomized controlled trial phase III study comparing hepatic arterial infusion with systemic chemotherapy after curative resection to liver metastasis of colorectal carcinoma: JFMC 29-0003. J Cancer Res Ther 2017; 13: 84–90.
-
House MG, Kemeny NE, Gonen M, Fong Y, Allen PJ, Paty PB, et al: Comparison of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with or without hepatic arterial infusional chemotherapy after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 851–856.
-
Goéré D, Benhaim L, Bonnet S, Malka D, Faron M, Elias D, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence. A comparative study between hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and modern systemic chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 114–120.
-
Portier G, Elias D, Bouche O, Rougier P, Bosset JF, Saric J, et al: Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4976–4982.
-
Parks R, Gonen M, Kemeny NE, Jarnagin WR, D’Angelica M, DeMatteo R, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: analysis of data from two continents. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 753–761.
-
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al: Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2335–2342.
-
Snoeren N, van Hillegerberg R, Schouten SB, Bergman AM, van Werkhoven E, Dalesio O, et al: Randomized phase III study to assess efficacy and safety of adjuvant CAPOX with or without bevacizumab in patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases: HEPATICA study. Neoplasia 2017; 19: 93–99.
-
Douillard JY, Cunninham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, Kavasek P, Jandik P, et al: Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 200; 355: 1041–1047.
-
Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, et al: FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 2004: 22: 229–237.
-
Ychou M, Hohenberger W, Thezenas S, Navarro M, Manuel J, Bokemeyer C, et al: A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 1964–1970.
-
Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Loss M, Tugwell P: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
-
Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L: Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2815–2834.
-
Lu G, Ades AE: Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med 2004; 23: 3105–3124.
-
Ades AE, Sculper M, Sutton A, Abrams K, Cooper N, Welton N, et al: Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24: 1–19.
-
Wandel J, Juni P, Tendal B, Nüesch G, Villiger PM, Welton NJ, et al: Effects of glucosamine, chondrotin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 341:c4675.
-
Dias S, Sutton AJ, Welton NJ, Ades AE: Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity – subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustment. Med Decis Making 2013; 33: 618–640.
-
Guddat C, Grouven U, Bender R, Skipka G: A note on the graphical presentation of prediction intervals in random-effects meta-analyses. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 34.
-
Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP: Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 163–171.
-
Chaimani A, Salanti G: Visualizing assumptions and results in network meta-analysis: the network graph package. Stata J 2015; 15: 905–920.
-
Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected with simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629–634.
-
Ducreux M, Ychou M, Laplanche A, Gamelin E, Lasser P, Husseini F, et al: Hepatic arterial oxaliplatin infusion plus intravenous chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with inoperable hepatic metastases: a trial of the gastrointestinal group of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4881–4887.
Article / Publication Details
Received: May 09, 2018
Accepted: June 05, 2018
Published online: July 25, 2018
Issue release date: September 2018
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 6
Number of Tables: 1
ISSN: 2296-3774 (Print)
eISSN: 2296-3766 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GAT
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission