Oncology Research and Treatment
Research Article
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor in European Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Tyrosine Kinase InhibitorsAguiar-Bujanda D. · Dueñas-Comino A. · Saura-Grau S. · Ros-Sanjuan L. · Blanco-Sanchez M.J. · Hernandez-Sosa M. · Mori-De Santiago M. · Galvan-Ruiz S. · Lorenzo-Barreto J.E. · Vargas-Prado A.M. · Bohn-Sarmiento U.Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: June 09, 2018
Accepted: July 23, 2018
Published online: November 13, 2018
Issue release date: December 2018
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 2296-5270 (Print)
eISSN: 2296-5262 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORT
Summary
Background: A high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with adverse outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, information on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced NSCLC is scarce, and most of the studies published have been conducted in Asian populations. We aimed to assess the influence of pretreatment NLR on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in Western European patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 41 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs between June 2010 and May 2016 was carried out. The association between several prognostic factors including pretreatment NLR and survival was analyzed. Results: Median PFS and OS were 10.58 and 20.84 months, respectively. OS for patients with a high NLR was 7.4 months, compared to 24.6 months for patients with a low NLR (p = 0.0122). In multivariate analysis, poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥ 2) and presence of ≥ 3 metastatic locations were identified as significant independent prognostic factors for worse PFS. For OS, unfavorable prognostic factors were a high NLR and central nervous system metastasis at diagnosis. Conclusion: Pretreatment NLR is an independent prognostic factor for OS in Western European patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs.
© 2018 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
Related Articles:
References
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al.: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-E386.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30.
- Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al.: Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947-957.
- Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, et al.; North-East Japan Study Group: Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2380-2388.
- Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al.: Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:735-742.
- Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al.: Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:239-246.
- Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, et al.: Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3327-3334.
- Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, et al.: Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:213-222.
- Shi YK, Wang L, Han BH, et al.: First-line icotinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (CONVINCE): a phase 3, open-label, randomized study. Ann Oncol 2017;28:2443-2450.
- Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, et al.: Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:141-151.
- Oxnard GR, Arcila ME, Sima CS, et al.: Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: distinct natural history of patients with tumors harboring the T790M mutation. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:1616-1622.
- Yu HA, Arcila ME, Rekhtman N, et al.: Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:2240-2247.
- Wang J, Wang B, Chu H, Yao Y: Intrinsic resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:3711-3726.
- Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F: Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454:436-444.
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-674.
- Jafri SH, Shi R, Mills G: Advance lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) at diagnosis is a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a retrospective review. BMC Cancer 2013;13:158.
- Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Seruga B, et al.: Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju124.
- Dolan RD, Lim J, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, McMillan DC: The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with operable cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7:16717.
- Yin Y, Wang J, Wang X, et al.: Prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015;70:524-530.
- Berardi R, Rinaldi S, Santoni M, et al.: Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemo- or targeted therapy. Oncotarget 2016;7:26916-26924.
- Yu Y, Qian L, Cui J: Value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting lung cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis of 7,219 patients. Mol Clin Oncol 2017;7:498-506.
- Lee Y, Kim SH, Han JY, Kim HT, Yun T, Lee JS: Early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reduction as a surrogate marker of prognosis in never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2012;138:2009-2016.
- Lin GN, Peng JW, Liu PP, Liu DY, Xiao JJ, Chen XQ: Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor outcome in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line gefitinib or erlotinib treatment. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2017;13:E189-E194.
- Sim SH, Beom SH, Ahn YO, et al.: Pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is not a significant prognostic factor in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thorac Cancer 2016;7:161-166.
- Ding PN, Roberts TL, Chua W, et al.: Clinical outcomes in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer in South Western Sydney Local Health District. Intern Med J 2017;47:1405-1411.
- Minami S, Ogata Y, Ihara S, Yamamoto S, Komuta K: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts overall survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. World J Oncol 2017;8:180-187.
- Meriggi F, Codignola C, Beretta GD, et al.: Significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in Western advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer receiving a targeted therapy. Tumori 2017;103:443-448.
- Mei Z, Shi L, Wang B, et al.: Prognostic role of pretreatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 cohort studies. Cancer Treat Rev 2017;58:1-13.
- Dolan RD, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, Laird B, McMillan DC: The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with advanced inoperable cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017;116:134-146.
- Zhang H, Xia H, Zhang L, Zhang B, Yue D, Wang C: Clinical significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte vs platelet-lymphocyte ratio in primary operable patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Surg 2015;210:526-535.
- Luo H, Ge H, Cui Y, et al.: Systemic inflammation biomarkers predict survival in patients of early stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy - a single center experience. J Cancer 2018;9:182-188.
- Han JY, Park K, Kim SW, et al.: First-SIGNAL: first-line single-agent Iressa versus gemcitabine and cisplatin trial in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1122-1128.
Article / Publication Details
Received: June 09, 2018
Accepted: July 23, 2018
Published online: November 13, 2018
Issue release date: December 2018
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 2296-5270 (Print)
eISSN: 2296-5262 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORT
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission