Caries Research

Current Topic

Association of Enamel Caries Lesions with Oral Hygiene and DMFT among Adults

Laajala A.a · Pesonen P.b · Anttonen V.a,c · Laitala M.-L.a

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Pediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
bNorthern Finland Birth Cohorts, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
cMedical Research Center, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Related Articles for ""

Caries Res 2019;53:475–481

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Current Topic

Received: May 11, 2018
Accepted: January 29, 2019
Published online: March 27, 2019
Issue release date: June 2019

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of enamel caries lesions and their association with tooth brushing frequency, tooth brushing quality, and past caries experience among Finnish adults. The study population comprised 46-year-old members of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 1,961). Caries lesions were examined and recorded at surface level using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The cut-off point for enamel caries was set to ICDAS score 3. The cut-off point for brushing frequency was twice daily. Visible plaque on buccal tooth surfaces represented brushing quality. Using enamel caries lesions (ICDAS1–3) as a dependent variable, an adjusted logistic regression model was conducted to investigate the association with gender, brushing frequency, visible plaque, dentin caries lesions (ICDAS4–6), teeth with restorations, extractions and fractures. Almost all participants (99%) had enamel and 40% had dentin caries lesions; the mean number of teeth with enamel caries lesions was 13.8 (SD 4.6). According to the adjusted logistic regression model, the high prevalence of ICDAS1–3 lesions was associated with having visible plaque on more than 20% of teeth and having more than 13 restored teeth. In conclusion, the prevalence of enamel caries lesions is high among the Finnish adult population. The results of this study suggest that in addition to tooth brushing frequency, the presence of visible plaque seems to be critical when evaluating the association between tooth brushing and enamel caries.

© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Alaraudanjoki V, Laitala ML, Tjäderhane L, Pesonen P, Lussi A, Anttonen V. Association of erosive tooth wear and dental caries in Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 - an epidemiological cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2016 Jul;17(1):6.
  2. Batchelor PA, Sheiham A. Grouping of tooth surfaces by susceptibility to caries: a study in 5-16 year-old children. BMC Oral Health. 2004 Oct;4(1):2.
  3. Blomqvist P, Ojala E, Kettunen T, Poskiparta M, Kasila K. Community-based oral health promotion practices targeted at children and adolescents in Finland—developing an assessment tool. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;42(3):245–53.
  4. Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Poulton R. Trajectory patterns of dental caries experience in the permanent dentition to the fourth decade of life. J Dent Res. 2008 Jan;87(1):69–72.
  5. Carta G, Cagetti MG, Cocco F, Sale S, Lingström P, Campus G. Caries-risk profiles in Italian adults using computer caries assessment system and ICDAS. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29(1):S1806–83242015000100306.
  6. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Longbottom C, Pitts NB. Visual and tactile assessment of arrested initial enamel carious lesions: an in vivo pilot study. Caries Res. 2005 May-Jun;39(3):173–7.
  7. Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Pathology of dental caries. In: Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E, editors. Dental caries. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008. pp. 20–47.
  8. Fyffe HE, Deery C, Nugent ZJ, Nuttall NM, Pitts NB. Effect of diagnostic threshold on the validity and reliability of epidemiological caries diagnosis using the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;28(1):42–51.
  9. Hannigan A, O’Mullane DM, Barry D, Schäfer F, Roberts AJ. A caries susceptibility classification of tooth surfaces by survival time. Caries Res. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):103–8.
  10. Hopcraft MS, Morgan MV. Pattern of dental caries experience on tooth surfaces in an adult population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;34(3):174–83.
  11. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Committee. Rationale and evidence for the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS II) [Internet] [cited 2018 April 24]. Available from: https://www.iccms-web.com/
  12. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):170–8.
  13. Kämppi A, Tanner T, Päkkilä J, Patinen P, Järvelin MR, Tjäderhane L, et al. Geographical distribution of dental caries prevalence and associated factors in young adults in Finland. Caries Res. 2013;47(4):346–54.
  14. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015 May;94(5):650–8.
  15. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AG, Bernabé E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, et al; GBD 2015 Oral Health Collaborators. GBD 2015 Oral Health Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017 Apr;96(4):380–7.
  16. Klein H, Palmer C, Knutson J. Dental status and dental needs of elementary school children. Studies on dental caries I. Public Health Rep. 1938;53:751–65.
    External Resources
  17. Laajala A, Karhatsu P, Pesonen P, Laitala ML, Näpänkangas R, Raustia A, et al. Association of indirect restorations with past caries history and present need for restorative treatment in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1495–501.
  18. Laitala ML, Piipari L, Sämpi N, Korhonen M, Pesonen P, Joensuu T, et al. Validity of digital imaging of fiber-optic transillumination in caries detection on proximal tooth surfaces. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:8289636.
  19. Manji F, Dahlen G, Fejerskov O. Caries and Periodontitis: Contesting the Conventional Wisdom on Their Aetiology. Caries Res. 2018;52(6):548–64.
  20. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Primary Health Care Act (66/1972) [Internet] [cited 2018 October 14]. English translation available from: http://finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1972/en19720066
  21. Niiranen T, Widström E, Niskanen T. Oral Health Care Reform in Finland - aiming to reduce inequity in care provision. BMC Oral Health. 2008 Jan;8(1):3.
  22. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V. Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res. 2003 Feb;82(2):117–22.
  23. Oscarson N, Espelid I, Jönsson B. Is caries equally distributed in adults? A population-based cross-sectional study in Norway - the TOHNN-study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Nov;75(8):557–63.
  24. Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR; ICDAS Foundation. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and its International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) - methods for staging of the caries process and enabling dentists to manage caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e41–52.
  25. Rantakallio P. The longitudinal study of the northern Finland birth cohort of 1966. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1988 Jan;2(1):59–88.
  26. Schulte AG, Pitts NB, Huysmans MC, Splieth C, Buchalla W. European core curriculum in cariology for undergraduate dental students. Caries Res. 2011;45(4):336–45.
  27. Stecksén-Blicks C, Hasslöf P, Kieri C, Widman K. Caries and background factors in Swedish 4-year-old children with special reference to immigrant status. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Nov;72(8):852–8.
  28. Suominen-Taipale L, Nordblad A, Vehkalahti M. Utilisation of services. In: Suominen-Taipale L, Nordblad A, Vehkalahti M, Aromaa A, editors. Oral health in the Finnish adult population. Health 2000 survey. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute; 2008. B25/2008, p. 30-38.
  29. Tanner T, Kämppi A, Päkkilä J, Patinen P, Rosberg J, Karjalainen K, et al. Prevalence and polarization of dental caries among young, healthy adults: cross-sectional epidemiological study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1436–42.
  30. The FDI General Assembly. Classification of caries lesions of tooth surfaces and caries management systems [Internet] [cited 2018 April 24]. Available from: https://www.fdiworlddental.org/resources/policy-statements-and-resolutions/classification-of-caries-lesions-of-tooth-surfaces-and
  31. Tolvanen M, Lahti S, Poutanen R, Seppä L, Hausen H. Children’s oral health-related behaviors: individual stability and stage transitions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;38(5):445–52.
  32. Vehkalahti M, Varsio S, Hausen H. Dental status. In: Suominen-Taipale L, Nordblad A, Vehkalahti M, Aromaa A, editors. Oral health in the Finnish adult population. Health 2000 survey. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute; 2008. B25/2008; p. 44–48.
  33. Vuorenkoski L, Mladovsky P, Mossialos E. Finland: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2008;10:1–168.
  34. Widström E, Linden J, Tiira H, Seppälä TT, Ekqvist M. Treatment provided in the public dental service in finland in 2009. Community Dent Health. 2015 Mar;32(1):60–4.
    External Resources
  35. World Health Organization. Assessment of oral health status. In: World Health Organization, editor. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 42–7.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Current Topic

Received: May 11, 2018
Accepted: January 29, 2019
Published online: March 27, 2019
Issue release date: June 2019

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP