Pediatric Neurosurgery
Original Paper
Pediatric Brainstem Gliomas: A Retrospective Study of 180 Patients from the SEER DatabaseKhalid S.I.a · Kelly R.b · Adogwa O.a · Carlton A.c · Tam E.d · Naqvi S.e · Kushkuley J.f · Ahmad S.a · Woodward J.a · Khanna R.a · Davison M.a · Munoz L.a · Byrne R.aaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
bGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA cChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, IL, USA dDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA eCollege of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA fDepartment of PA Studies, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, USA |
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: April 17, 2018
Accepted: February 03, 2019
Published online: April 04, 2019
Issue release date: July 2019
Number of Print Pages: 14
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 2
ISSN: 1016-2291 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0305 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PNE
Abstract
Background/Aims: Large population-based studies are needed to assess the epidemiology and survival risk factors associated with pediatric brainstem gliomas. This retrospective study explores factors that may influence survival in this population. Methods: Utilizing the SEER database, the authors retrospectively assessed survival in histologically confirmed brainstem gliomas in patients aged 17 and younger. Survival was described with Kaplan-Meyer curves and multivariate regression analysis. Results: This analysis of 180 cases showed that age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.14, p = 0.34), non-white race (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35–2.85 p > 0.99), distant or invasive extension of the tumor (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.08–2.53, p = 0.37), and radiation therapy (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.52–3.11, p = 0.61) were not associated with decreased survival. High-grade tumor status (HR 8.64, 95% CI 3.49–21.41, p < 0.001) was associated with decreased survival. Partial resection (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04–0.30, p < 0.001) and gross-total resection (HR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01–0.14, p < 0.001) were associated with improved survival. Conclusions: High-grade brainstem gliomas have a worse prognosis. Early diagnosis and surgery appear to be associated with improved survival, while the role of radiation is unclear.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Albright AL, Price RA, Guthkelch AN. Brain stem gliomas of children. A clinicopathological study. Cancer. 1983 Dec;52(12):2313–9.
- Farwell JR, Dohrmann GJ, Flannery JT. Central nervous system tumors in children. Cancer. 1977 Dec;40(6):3123–32.
- Freeman CR, Farmer JP. Pediatric brain stem gliomas: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan;40(2):265–71.
- Stiller CA. Population based survival rates for childhood cancer in Britain, 1980-91. BMJ. 1994 Dec;309(6969):1612–6.
- Walker DA, Punt JA, Sokal M. Clinical management of brain stem glioma. Arch Dis Child. 1999 Jun;80(6):558–64.
- Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. Neuro Oncol. 2012 Nov;14 Suppl 5:v1–49.
- Jallo GI, Biser-Rohrbaugh A, Freed D. Brainstem gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004 Mar;20(3):143–53.
- Ueoka DI, Nogueira J, Campos JC, Maranhão Filho P, Ferman S, Lima MA. Brainstem gliomas – retrospective analysis of 86 patients. J Neurol Sci. 2009 Jun;281(1-2):20–3.
- Guillamo JS, Monjour A, Taillandier L, Devaux B, Varlet P, Haie-Meder C, et al.; Association des Neuro-Oncologues d’Expression Française (ANOCEF). Brainstem gliomas in adults: prognostic factors and classification. Brain. 2001 Dec;124(Pt 12):2528–39.
- Kaplan AM, Albright AL, Zimmerman RA, Rorke LB, Li H, Boyett JM, et al. Brainstem gliomas in children. A Children’s Cancer Group review of 119 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996;24(4):185–92.
- Mauffrey C. Paediatric brainstem gliomas: prognostic factors and management. J Clin Neurosci. 2006 May;13(4):431–7.
-
Sun T, Wan W, Wu Z, Zhang J, Zhang L. Clinical outcomes and natural history of pediatric brainstem tumors: with 33 cases follow-ups. Neurosurg Rev. 2013;36(2):311–20.
External Resources
- Sandri A, Sardi N, Genitori L, Giordano F, Peretta P, Basso ME, et al. Diffuse and focal brain stem tumors in childhood: prognostic factors and surgical outcome. Experience in a single institution. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Sep;22(9):1127–35.
- Teo C, Siu TL. Radical resection of focal brainstem gliomas: is it worth doing? Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Nov;24(11):1307–14.
- Mehta VS, Chandra PS, Singh PK, Garg A, Rath GK. Surgical considerations for “intrinsic” brainstem gliomas: proposal of a modification in classification. Neurol India. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):274–81.
- Halperin EC. Pediatric brain stem tumors: patterns of treatment failure and their implications for radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Jul;11(7):1293–8.
- Mandell LR, Kadota R, Freeman C, Douglass EC, Fontanesi J, Cohen ME, et al. There is no role for hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the management of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic brainstem tumors: results of a Pediatric Oncology Group phase III trial comparing conventional vs. hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Mar;43(5):959–64.
- Janssens GO, Gidding CE, Van Lindert EJ, Oldenburger FR, Erasmus CE, Schouten-Meeteren AY, et al. The role of hypofractionation radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma in children: a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar;73(3):722–6.
- Janssens GO, Jansen MH, Lauwers SJ, Nowak PJ, Oldenburger FR, Bouffet E, et al. Hypofractionation vs conventional radiation therapy for newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a matched-cohort analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb;85(2):315–20.
- Zaghloul MS, Eldebawy E, Ahmed S, Mousa AG, Amin A, Refaat A, et al. Hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy for pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG): a randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Apr;111(1):35–40.
- Fuchs I, Kreil W, Sutter B, Papaethymiou G, Pendl G. Gamma Knife radiosurgery of brainstem gliomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;84:85–90.
- Raikar SS, Halloran DR, Elliot M, McHugh M, Patel S, Gauvain KM. Outcomes of pediatric low-grade gliomas treated with radiation therapy: a single-institution study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 Aug;36(6):e366–70.
- Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803–20.
- Guillamo JS, Doz F, Delattre JY. Brain stem gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol. 2001 Dec;14(6):711–5.
- El-Ayadi M, Ansari M, Sturm D, Gielen GH, Warmuth-Metz M, Kramm CM, et al. High-grade glioma in very young children: a rare and particular patient population. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun;8(38):64564–78.
- Karremann M, Gielen GH, Hoffmann M, Wiese M, Colditz N, Warmuth-Metz M, et al. Diffuse high-grade gliomas with H3 K27M mutations carry a dismal prognosis independent of tumor location. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan;20(1):123–31.
- Ryall S, Krishnatry R, Arnoldo A, Buczkowicz P, Mistry M, Siddaway R, et al. Targeted detection of genetic alterations reveal the prognostic impact of H3K27M and MAPK pathway aberrations in paediatric thalamic glioma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Aug;4(1):93.
- Khuong-Quang DA, Buczkowicz P, Rakopoulos P, Liu XY, Fontebasso AM, Bouffet E, et al. K27M mutation in histone H3.3 defines clinically and biologically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Sep;124(3):439–47.
- Buczkowicz P, Bartels U, Bouffet E, Becher O, Hawkins C. Histopathological spectrum of paediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Oct;128(4):573–81.
- Kramm CM, Wagner S, Van Gool S, Schmid H, Sträter R, Gnekow A, et al. Improved survival after gross total resection of malignant gliomas in pediatric patients from the HIT-GBM studies. Anticancer Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;26 5B:3773–9.
- Lapras C, Bognar L, Turjman F, Villanyi E, Mottolese C, Fischer C, et al. Tectal plate gliomas. Part I: microsurgery of the tectal plate gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;126(2-4):76–83.
- Li KW, Roonprapunt C, Lawson HC, Abbott IR, Wisoff J, Epstein F, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus associated with tectal gliomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jun;18 6A:E2.
- Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL. The long-term outcome in children with late-onset aqueductal stenosis resulting from benign intrinsic tectal tumors. J Neurosurg. 1994 Apr;80(4):681–8.
- Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, Lu C, Paugh BS, Becksfort J, et al.; St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital–Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome Project. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat Genet. 2012 Jan;44(3):251–3.
- Ronghe M, Hargrave D, Bartels U, Tabori U, Vaidya S, Chandler C, et al. Vincristine and carboplatin chemotherapy for unresectable and/or recurrent low-grade astrocytoma of the brainstem. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Sep;55(3):471–7.
- Packer RJ, Lange B, Ater J, Nicholson HS, Allen J, Walker R, et al. Carboplatin and vincristine for recurrent and newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas of childhood. J Clin Oncol. 1993 May;11(5):850–6.
- Massimino M, Spreafico F, Biassoni V, Simonetti F, Riva D, Trecate G, et al. Diffuse pontine gliomas in children: changing strategies, changing results? A mono-institutional 20-year experience. J Neurooncol. 2008 May;87(3):355–61.
- Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E. Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Mar;7(3):241–8.
- Warren KE, Goldman S, Pollack IF, Fangusaro J, Schaiquevich P, Stewart CF, et al. Phase I trial of lenalidomide in pediatric patients with recurrent, refractory, or progressive primary CNS tumors: Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study PBTC-018. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan;29(3):324–9.
- Robison NJ, Campigotto F, Chi SN, Manley PE, Turner CD, Zimmerman MA, et al. A phase II trial of a multi-agent oral antiangiogenic (metronomic) regimen in children with recurrent or progressive cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Apr;61(4):636–42.
- Gururangan S, Fangusaro J, Poussaint TY, McLendon RE, Onar-Thomas A, Wu S, et al. Efficacy of bevacizumab plus irinotecan in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas – a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(2):310–7.
- Bailey S, Howman A, Wheatley K, Wherton D, Boota N, Pizer B, et al. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma treated with prolonged temozolomide and radiotherapy – results of a United Kingdom phase II trial (CNS 2007 04). Eur J Cancer. 2013 Dec;49(18):3856–62.
- Cohen KJ, Heideman RL, Zhou T, Holmes EJ, Lavey RS, Bouffet E, et al. Temozolomide in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Neuro Oncol. 2011 Apr;13(4):410–6.
- Landolfi JC, Thaler HT, DeAngelis LM. Adult brainstem gliomas. Neurology. 1998 Oct;51(4):1136–9.
-
Selvapandian S, Rajshekhar V, Chandy MJ. Brainstem glioma: comparative study of clinico-radiological presentation, pathology and outcome in children and adults. Acta Neurochir. 1999;141(7):721–7.
External Resources
Article / Publication Details
Received: April 17, 2018
Accepted: February 03, 2019
Published online: April 04, 2019
Issue release date: July 2019
Number of Print Pages: 14
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 2
ISSN: 1016-2291 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0305 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PNE
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission