Hidden Hunger and the Transformation of Food Systems

How to Combat the Double Burden of Malnutrition?

Editor(s): Biesalski, Hans Konrad (Stuttgart)
 

Fruits and Vegetables in International Agricultural Research: A Case of Neglect?

Anderson J.R.a · Birner R.b

Author affiliations

aUniversity of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
bHans-Ruthenberg Institute, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

Related Articles for ""
Biesalski HK (ed): Hidden Hunger and the Transformation of Food Systems. How to Combat the Double Burden of Malnutrition? World Rev Nutr Diet. Basel, Karger, 2020, vol 121, pp 42–59
https://doi.org/10.1159/000507518

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Sign up to MyKarger

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Complete book

  • Immediate access to all parts of this book
  • Cover-to-cover formats may be available
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restriction for personal use
read more

Pricing depends on hard-cover price

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

Received: January 28, 2020
Accepted: January 28, 2020
Published online: October 06, 2020
Cover Date: 2020

Number of Print Pages: 18
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISBN: 978-3-318-06697-5 (Print)
eISBN: 978-3-318-06698-2 (Online)

Abstract

Fruits and vegetables (F+Vs) can play an important role in combatting the problem of the double burden of malnutrition. Agricultural research can help to increase the productivity and the resource-use efficiency of fruit and vegetable production and, thus, reduce prices so that these commodities can become more available to poor households. However, the crops research of the international agricultural research system, including its centerpiece the CGIAR, has so far concentrated mainly on staple grains and starchy food crops, while largely neglecting most F+Vs. None of the current CGIAR centers is specifically dedicated to fruits or vegetables if the convention is followed not to consider cassava, potatoes of all types, and bananas and their relatives as vegetables. The underlying reasons why the CGIAR has not focused on F+Vs are explored in this review. The early emphasis on food staple crops was motivated by the perception that the hunger problems of the era were primarily deficiencies in food energy. The success of the Green Revolution, in which international agricultural research played a key role, stimulated further emphasis on increasing the productivity of staple grains as the major strategy to combat hunger. F+Vs, however, received limited attention. The Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center in Taiwan was created outside the CGIAR system. In the 1990s new centers were added to the CGIAR system, but this opportunity was not used to create a dedicated center for F+Vs. Some informal activities to conduct research on F+Vs also took place in several other CGIAR centers as part of the farming systems research activities, based on the recognition that F+Vs are small but important elements of many farming systems of the developing world. Through an analysis of the reasons why the CGIAR system has tended little to F+Vs, this paper presents an assessment of possible future strategies to better integrate these “neglected” commodities into international agricultural research efforts. The assessment shows that genetic improvement might perhaps best be largely left to the private sector, while international agricultural research could better focus on developing strategies for integrated pest management, biological pest control, and improved water use efficiency, as these are areas where private companies have limited incentives to invest. Moreover, publicly funded research could help to find low-cost solutions for infrastructure-related aspects such as postharvest handling and storage (e.g., cooling and drying), aspects where renewable energy sources have a substantial potential.

© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Schreinemachers P, Simmons EB, Wopereis MCS: Tapping the economic and nutritional power of vegetables. Glob Food Sec 2018;16:36–45.
  2. Mcmullin S, Stadlmayr B, Roothaert R, Jamnadass R: Fresh fruit and vegetables: contributions to food and nutrition security; in Ferranti P, Berry EM, Anderson JR (eds): Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability. Oxford, Elsevier, 2018, pp 217–225.
  3. Siegel KR, Ali MK, Srinivasiah A, Nugent RA, Narayan KMV: Do we produce enough fruits and vegetables to meet global health need? PLoS One 2014;9:1–7.
  4. Lock K, Pomerleau J, Causer L, Altmann DR, Mckee M: The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit. World Heal Organ Bull World Heal Organ 2005;83:100–108.
  5. Darmon N, Drewnowski A: Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis. Nutr Rev 2015;73:643–660.
  6. Mason-D’Croz D, Bogard JR, Sulser TB, Cenacchi N, Dunston S, Herrero M, et al: Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: an integrated modelling study. Lancet Planet Heal 2019;3:e318–e329.
  7. Alston JM, Norton GW, Pardey PG: Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Davis, Cornell University Press, 1995.
  8. Pingali P: Agricultural policy and nutrition outcomes – getting beyond the preoccupation with staple grains. Food Secur 2015;7:583–591.
  9. Gómez MI, Barrett CB, Raney T, Pinstrup-Andersen P, Meerman J, Croppenstedt A, et al: Post-green revolution food systems and the triple burden of malnutrition. Food Policy 2013;42:129–138.
  10. Pingali P: Beyond staple grain fundamentalism – towards a more diverse agri-food system. Unpubl. paper, 2019.
  11. Colin KK, Jarvis A: The changing composition of the global diet: implications for CGIAR research. CIAT Policy Brief No. 18. Palmira, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), 2014.
  12. FAO: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture. Briefing paper prepared for the Second International Conference on Nutrition, November 19–21, 2014. Rome, FAO, 2014. fao.org/icn2.
  13. Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition: How can agriculture and food system policies improve nutrition? Technical brief. London, Global Panel, 2014.
  14. USAID: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: nutrient-rich value chains – technical guidance brief, multi-sectoral nutrition strategy 2014–2025. Washington, USAID.
  15. Herforth A, Ahmed S: The food environment, its effects on dietary consumption, and potential for measurement within agriculture-nutrition interventions. Food Secur 2015;7:505–520.
  16. Ruel MT, Quisumbing AR, Balagamwala M: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: what have we learned so far? Glob Food Sec 2018;17:128–153.
  17. Ali M: Background paper to the World Development Report 2008: horticulture revolution for the poor: nature, challenges and opportunities. Washington, World Bank, 2008.
  18. Sibhatu KT, Krishna VV, Qaim M: Production diversity and dietary diversity in smallholder farm households. PNAS 2015;112:10675–10662.
  19. Choudhury S, Headey D: What drives diversification of national food supplies? A cross-country analysis. Glob Food Sec 2017;15:85–93.
  20. Gödecke T, Stein AJ, Qaim M: The global burden of chronic and hidden hunger: trends and determinants. Glob Food Sec 2018;17:21–29.
  21. Krishna Bahadur KC, Dias GM, Veeramani A, Swanton CJ, Fraser D, Steinke D, et al: When too much isn’t enough: does current food production meet global nutritional needs? PLoS One 2018;13:e0205683.
  22. Nelson G, Bogard J, Lividini K, Arsenault J, Riley M, Sulser TB, et al: Income growth and climate change effects on global nutrition security to mid-century. Nat Sustain 2018;1:773–781.
  23. Merriam-Webster: Neglect. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neglect (accessed January 27, 2020).
  24. Thompson FE, Willis GB, Thompson OM, Yaroch AL: The meaning of “fruits” and “vegetables.” Public Health Nutr 2011;14:1222–1228.
  25. Roark RA, Niederhauser VP: Fruit and vegetable intake: issues with definition and measurement. Public Health Nutr 2012;16:2–7.
  26. WorldVeg: World Vegetable Center Strategy 2017–2025: healthier lives, more resilient livelihoods. Tainan, World Vegetable Center, 2017.
  27. Spjut RW: A systematic treatment of fruit types. Mem NY Bot Gard 1994;70:1–181.
  28. Caswell BL, Talegawkar SA, Siamusantu W, West KP, Palmer AC: A 10-Food Group Dietary Diversity Score outperforms a 7-Food Group Score in characterizing seasonal variability and micronutrient adequacy in rural Zambian children. J Nutr 2018;148:131–139.
  29. Food and Agriculture Organization: Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Rome, FAO and EU, 2013.
  30. World Health Organization: Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices – part 1: definitions. Geneva, UNICEF and WHO, 2008.
  31. United States Department of Agriculture: What is a specialty crop? Washington, USDA. https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/scbgp/specialty-crop (accessed January 27, 2020).
  32. Bohan C: US Congress rules that pizza is a vegetable. theJournal.ie, 2011. https://www.thejournal.ie/us-congress-rules-that-pizza-is-a-vegetable-282033-Nov2011/ (accessed January 26, 2020).
  33. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research: Research Centers. Montpellier, CGIAR. https://www.cgiar.org/research/research-centers/ (accessed January 26, 2020).
  34. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research: 2018 CGIAR portfolio financing plan. Montpellier, CGIAR, 2018.
  35. Özgediz S: The CGIAR at 40: institutional evolution of the world’s premier agricultural research network. Washington, CGIAR Fund Office, 2012.
  36. Anderson JR, Herdt RW, Scobie GM: Science and food: the CGIAR and its partners. Washington, World Bank, 1988.
  37. TAC Secretariat: Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. Rome, FAO, 1972. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  38. TAC Secretariat: Report on the TAC Vegetable Appraisal Mission. Rome, FAO, 1976.
  39. TAC Secretariat: Report of the TAC Vegetable Research Project Formulation Mission. Rome, FAO, 1977.
  40. TAC Secretariat: TAC proposal for the creation of an International Center for Vegetable Research within the CGIAR system. Rome, FAO, 1979. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-a499a.
  41. TAC Secretariat: CGIAR priorities and future strategies. Rome, FAO, 1987.
  42. CGIAR Secretariat: Report on the proposed SADCC/AVRDC/ISNAR collaborative network for vegetable research. Washington, World Bank, 1989.
  43. Gryseels G, Anderson JR: International agricultural research; in Pardey PG, Roseboom J, Anderson JR (eds): Agricultural Research Policy: International Quantitative Perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp 309–339.
  44. CGIAR Secretariat: Summary of proceedings and decisions: International Centers Week 1990. Washington, World Bank, 1991.
  45. CGIAR Secretariat: Concept note (unpubl., dated May 29, 2003). Rome, CGIAR, 2003.
  46. CGIAR Science Council: Summary report on system priorities for CGIAR research 2005–2015. Rome, CGIAR Science Council Secretariat, 2005.
  47. HarvestPlus: Our history. https://www.harvestplus.org/about/our-history (accessed January 26, 2020).
  48. Birner R, Byerlee D: Synthesis and lessons learned from 15 CRP evaluations. Rome, Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) for the CGIAR, 2016.
  49. McCalla AF: CGIAR reform – why so difficult? Review, reform, renewal, restructuring, reform again and then “the new CGIAR” – So much talk and so little basic structural change – why? Working Paper No. 14-001. Davis, University of California, 2014. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7h04960c.
  50. CGIAR: Research program on agriculture for nutrition and health (A4NH). https://a4nh.cgiar.org/ (accessed January 26, 2020).
  51. Hirvonen K, Headey D: Can governments promote homestead gardening at scale? Evidence from Ethiopia. Glob Food Sec 2018;19:40–47.
  52. Gelli A, Donovan J, Margolies A, Aberman N, Santa­croce M, Chirwa E, et al: Value chains to improve diets: diagnostics to support intervention design in Malawi. Glob Food Sec 2019, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.09.006.
  53. WorldVeg: World Vegetable Center – Annual report 2018. Tainan, World Vegetable Center, 2018.
  54. CGIAR: CGIAR system annual performance report 2018. Montpellier, CGIAR System Organization, 2018. https://www.cgiar.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CGIAR-Annual-Performance-Report-2017.pdf.
  55. InterAcademy Partnership: Opportunities for future research and innovation on food and nutrition security and agriculture: the InterAcademy Partnership’s global perspective. Trieste, IAP, 2018.
  56. IFPRI: Transforming food systems to deliver healthy, sustainable diets: the view from the World’s Science Academies – Report from a Policy Seminar co-organized by IFPRI and InterAcademy Partnership, February 14, 2019. Washington. https://www.ifpri.org/event/transforming-food-systems-deliver-healthy-sustainable-diets-view-worlds-science-academies (accessed January 26, 2020).
  57. Jarvis LS: Changing private and public roles in technology development: lessons from the Chilean fruit sector; in Anderson JR (ed): Agricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community. Wallingford, CAB International, 1994, pp 243–266.
  58. McIntire J: Reviving the national agricultural research system of Mexico; in Anderson JR (ed): Agricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community. Wallingford, CAB International, 1994, pp 135–148.
  59. Binswanger HP: Policy issues: a view from World Bank research; in Anderson JR (ed): Agricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community. Wallingford, CAB International, 1994, pp 624–628.
  60. Alston JM, Pardey PG: Public funding for research into specialty crops. Hortic Sci 2008;43:1461–1470.
  61. Stads G-J, Sastry K, Kumar G, Kondisetty T, Gao L: India agricultural R&D indicators factsheet. Washington, Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2016.
  62. Alston JM, Chan-Kang C, Marra MC, Pardey PG, Wyatt TJ: A meta-analysis of the rates of return to agricultural R&D: ex pede herculem. IFPRI Research Report No. 113, Washington, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2000.
  63. Naylor RL, Falcon WP, Goodman RM, Jahn MM, Sengooba T, Tefera H, et al: Biotechnology in the developing world: a case for increased investments in orphan crops. Food Policy 2004;29:15–44.
  64. Alston JM, Okrent AM: The effects of farm and food policy on obesity in the United States. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
  65. Pray C, Fuglie K: Agricultural research by the private sector. Annu Rev Resour Econ 2015;7:399–424.
  66. Fuglie K: The growing role of the private sector in agricultural research and development world-wide. Glob Food Sec 2016;10:29–38.
  67. Weinberg GM: An introduction to general systems thinking. New York, Wiley, 1975.
  68. Beintema N, Stads G-J: A comprehensive overview of investments and human resource capacity in African agricultural research. ASTI Report. Washington, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2017.
  69. Pardey PG, Alston JM, Chan-Kang C: Public agricultural R&D over the past half century: an emerging new world order. Agric Econ 2013;44:103–113.
  70. Pardey PG, Alston JM, Chan-Kang C, Hurley RS, Andrade SP, Dehmer K, et al: The Shifting Structure of Agricultural R&D: Worldwide Investment Patterns and Payoffs. From Agriscience to Agribusiness Theories, Policies and Practices in Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Cham, Springer, 2017.
  71. ChinaPower: How will the Belt and Road Initiative advance China’s interests? https://chinapower.csis.org/china-belt-and-road-initiative/ (accessed January 26, 2020).
  72. Yaseen M, Shiwei YW, Hassan S: Policy challenges to agricultural extension system in Pakistan: a review. Int J Agric Appl Sci 2015;7:111–115.
  73. Beintema N, Stads G-J, Fuglie K, Heisey PW: ASTI global assessment of agricultural R&D spending: developing countries accelerate investment. ASTI Report. Washington, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2012.
  74. Ali M, Anderson JR, Byerlee D, Jansen HGP: Diagnostic assessment of the Punjab agricultural and livestock innovation system: achievements, constraints, and ways forward. Islamabad, World Bank Pakistan Country Office, 2018.
  75. Plant & Food Research. International development. https://www.plantandfood.co.nz/page/about-us/international-development/ (accessed January 26, 2020).
  76. CIRAD: Fruit and vegetables. https://www.cirad.fr/en/our-research/tropical-supply-chains/fruit-and-vegetables/context-and-issues (accessed January 26, 2020).
  77. Nelson GC: The global food problem isn’t what you think. Washington Post, January 2, 2019. https://www.ifpri.org/news-release/global-food-problem-isnt-what-you-think-washington-post (accessed January 26, 2020).

Article / Publication Details

Received: January 28, 2020
Accepted: January 28, 2020
Published online: October 06, 2020
Cover Date: 2020

Number of Print Pages: 18
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISBN: 978-3-318-06697-5 (Print)
eISBN: 978-3-318-06698-2 (Online)

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Article Tools
Article Details

Table of Contents

Article

Recommend This
Stay Up to Date Banner Stay Up to Date Banner
TOP