ORL
Research Article
Impact of Masks on Speech Recognition in Adult Patients with and without Hearing LossRitter E. · Miller C. · Morse J. · Onuorah P. · Zeaton A. · Zanation A. · Ebert C.S. · Thorp B.D. · Senior B. · Kimple A.Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: March 07, 2021
Accepted: July 29, 2021
Published online: September 28, 2021
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 0301-1569 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0275 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORL
Abstract
Introduction: The coronavirus 2019 pandemic has altered how modern healthcare is delivered to patients. Concerns have been raised that masks may hinder effective communication, particularly in patients with hearing loss. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of masks on speech recognition in adult patients with and without self-reported hearing loss in a clinical setting. Methods: Adult patients presenting to an otolaryngology clinic were recruited. A digital recording of 36 spondaic words was presented to each participant in a standard clinical exam room. Each word was recorded in 1 of 3 conditions: no mask, surgical mask, or N95 mask. Participants were instructed to repeat back the word. The word recognition score was determined by the percent correctly repeated. Results: A total of 45 participants were included in this study. Overall, the mean word recognition score was 87% without a mask, 78% with a surgical mask, and 61% with an N95 mask. Among the 23 subjects (51.1%) with self-reported hearing loss, the average word recognition score was 46% with an N95 mask compared to 79% in patients who reported normal hearing (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that masks significantly decrease word recognition, and this effect is exacerbated with N95 masks, particularly in patients with hearing loss. As masks are essential to allow for safe patient-physician interactions, it is imperative that clinicians are aware they may create a barrier to effective communication.
© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel
References
-
Klompas M, Morris CA, Sinclair J, Pearson M, Shenoy ES. Universal masking in hospitals in the Covid-19 era.
N Engl J Med . 2020 May 21;382(21):e63.External Resources -
Gostin LO, Cohen IG, Koplan JP. Universal masking in the United States: the role of mandates, health education, and the CDC.
JAMA . 2020 Sep 1;324(9):837–8.External Resources -
Lescanne E, van der Mee-Marquet N, Juvanon JM, Abbas A, Morel N, Klein JM, et al. Best practice recommendations: ENT consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis . 2020 Sep;137(4):303–8.External Resources -
Reed NS, Altan A, Deal JA, Yeh C, Kravetz AD, Wallhagen M, et al. Trends in health care costs and utilization associated with untreated hearing loss over 10 years.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2019;145(1):27–34.External Resources -
Reed NS, Betz JF, Kucharska-Newton AM, Lin FR, Deal JA. Hearing loss and satisfaction with healthcare: an unexplored relationship.
J Am Geriatr Soc . 2019;67(3):624–6.External Resources -
Marrone N, Ingram M, Bischoff K, Burgen E, Carvajal SC, Bell ML. Self-reported hearing difficulty and its association with general, cognitive, and psychosocial health in the state of Arizona, 2015.
BMC Public Health . 2019 Jul 4;19(1):875.External Resources -
Cudmore V, Henn P, O’Tuathaigh CMP, Smith S. Age-related hearing loss and communication breakdown in the clinical setting.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2017;143(10):1054–5.External Resources -
Henn P, O’Tuathaigh C, Keegan D, Smith S. Hearing impairment and the amelioration of avoidable medical error: a cross-sectional survey.
J Patient Saf . 2021 Apr 1;17(3):e155–60. -
Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States.
Arch Intern Med . 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1851–2.External Resources -
Parush A, Wacht O, Gomes R, Frenkel A. Human factor considerations in using personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic context: Binational Survey Study.
J Med Internet Res . 2020 ;22(6):e19947.External Resources -
Trecca EMC, Gelardi M, Cassano M. COVID-19 and hearing difficulties.
Am J Otolaryngol . 2020 Aug;41(4):102496.External Resources -
Wittum KJ, Feth L, Hoglund E. The effects of surgical masks on speech perception in noise.
Proc Mtgs Acoust . 2013 May 14;19(1):060125. -
Mendel LL, Gardino JA, Atcherson SR. Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care?
J Am Acad Audiol . 2008 Oct;19(9):686–95.External Resources -
Atcherson SR, Mendel LL, Baltimore WJ, Patro C, Lee S, Pousson M, et al. The Effect of conventional and transparent surgical masks on speech understanding in individuals with and without hearing loss.
J Am Acad Audiol . 2017 Jan;28(1):58–67.External Resources -
Radonovich LJ, Yanke R, Cheng J, Bender B. Diminished speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators worn by healthcare workers.
J Occup Environ Hyg . 2010 Jan;7(1):63–70.External Resources -
Hirsh IJ, Davis H, Silverman SR, Reynolds EG, Eldert E, Benson RW. Development of materials for speech audiometry.
J Speech Hear Disord . 1952 Sep;17(3):321–37.External Resources -
Toscano JC, Toscano CM. Effects of face masks on speech recognition in multi-talker babble noise.
PLoS One . 2021;16(2):e0246842.External Resources -
Magee M, Lewis C, Noffs G, Reece H, Chan JCS, Zaga CJ, et al. Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols.
J Acoust Soc Am . 2020 Dec;148(6):3562.External Resources -
Bode DL, Carhart R. Estimating CNC discrimination with spondee words.
J Acoust Soc Am . 1975 May;57(5):1216–8.External Resources -
Demeester K, van Wieringen A, Hendrickx JJ, Topsakal V, Fransen E, van Laer L, et al. Audiometric shape and presbycusis.
Int J Audiol . 2009 Jan 1;48(4):222–32.External Resources -
Kiliç MA, Ogüt F. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2004;125(1):35–8. -
Hearing Loss Association of America.
How do I communicate with doctors, nurses, and staff at the hospital during COVID-19? [Internet] . Hearing Loss Association of America; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.hearingloss.org/communication-access-recommendations-hospitals-covid-19/. -
Newton VE, Shah SR. Improving communication with patients with a hearing impairment.
Community Eye Health . 2013;26(81):6–7. -
Banskota S, Healy M, Goldberg EM. 15 smartphone apps for older adults to use while in isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
West J Emerg Med . 2020 Apr 14;21(3):514–25.External Resources -
Dimer NA, Canto-Soaresdo ND, Santos-Teixeira LD, Goulart BNG. The COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of telehealth in speech-language and hearing therapy for patients at home: an experience report.
Codas . 2020;32(3):e20200144.External Resources -
Shew A. Let COVID-19 expand awareness of disability tech.
Nature . 2020;581(7806):9.External Resources -
Recio-Barbero M, Sáenz-Herrero M, Segarra R. Deafness and mental health: clinical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Psychol Trauma . 2020 Aug;12(S1):S212–3.External Resources -
Chodosh J, Weinstein BE, Blustein J. Face masks can be devastating for people with hearing loss.
BMJ . 2020 Jul ;370:m2683.External Resources -
Grote H, Izagaren F. Covid-19: the communication needs of D/deaf healthcare workers and patients are being forgotten.
BMJ . 2020 Jun ;369:m2372.External Resources
Article / Publication Details
Received: March 07, 2021
Accepted: July 29, 2021
Published online: September 28, 2021
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 0301-1569 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0275 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORL
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
