Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Efficacy and Tolerability of Entacapone as Adjunctive Therapy to Levodopa in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease and End-of-Dose Deterioration in Daily Medical Practice: An Open, Multicenter Study

Durif F.a · Devaux I.a · Pere J.-J.b · Delumeau J.-C.c · Bourdeix I.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, bNovartis Pharma SA, Paris, France; cNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Related Articles for ""

Eur Neurol 2001;45:111–118

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: February 16, 2001
Issue release date: February 2001

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 0014-3022 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9913 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ENE

Abstract

Entacapone is a potent, reversible and orally active inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase. This open multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of entacapone as adjunct therapy to levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (≧3 daily doses) in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The 8-week study included 489 patients under conditions of typical daily medical practice. Patients were treated with a 200-mg fixed dose of entacapone administered with each scheduled dose of levodopa to a maximum of 10 doses per day. Other antiparkinsonian medication should have been stable for at least 1 month. The primary efficacy criteria were: (1) Part II (activities of daily living, ADL) of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), (2) the reduction of ‘off’ time during the daily waking period as assessed by the percentage of patients improving by at least one category at Item 39 of Part IV of the UPDRS. Secondary outcome measures included: (1) the investigator’s global assessment of change, (2) quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Adverse events, vital signs and liver enzymes were monitored at weeks 2 and 8. The baseline mean score for ADL was 10.5 (±7.04), which decreased to 8.5 (±6.37) at the end of the study (p < 0.0001). Compared to baseline, 40.8% of patients experienced a reduction in ‘off’ time during the waking period; this improvement was highly significant (p < 0.0001). A reduction in the daily dose of levodopa was observed in 35.8% of patients (mean decrease 209 ± 149 mg). QoL was improved by a mean of 10% in all categories of the PDQ-39 (p < 0.001), except social support and cognition. This improvement was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The dyskinesia score (UPDRS Item 32) was decreased significantly from 2.3 to 2.1 from baseline to end of study (p < 0.001), although 52.7% of patients reported levodopa-induced dyskinesia as an adverse event. There was no case of increased liver enzymes. The study results confirm that the excellent risk/benefit ratio seen in phase III controlled studies can be seen in daily neurological practice. Moreover, the study suggests that the benefits of entacapone are associated with a significant improvement in QoL.

© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Marsden CD, Parkes JD: ‘On-off’ effects in patients with Parkinson’s disease on chronic levodopa therapy. Lancet 1976;i:292–296.
  2. Kaakkola S, Gordin A, Männistö P: General properties and clinical possibilities of new selective inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase. Gen Pharmacol 1994;25:813–824.
  3. Chase TN: Levodopa therapy: Consequences of the nonphysiologic replacement of dopamine. Neurology 1998;50(suppl 5):S17–S25.
  4. Nutt JG, Carter JH, Lea ES, Woodward WR: Motor fluctuations during continuous levodopa infusions in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1997;12:285–292.
    External Resources
  5. Ruottinen HM, Rinne UK: A double-blind pharmacokinetic and clinical dose-response study of entacapone as an adjunct to levodopa therapy in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1996;19:283–296.
  6. Keränen T, Gordin A, Karlsson M, Korpela K, Pentikäinen PJ, Rita H, Schultz E, Seppälä L, Wikberg T: Inhibition of soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase and single-dose pharmacokinetics after oral and intravenous administration of entacapone. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994;46:151–157.
  7. Nutt JG, Woodward WR, Beckner RM, Stone CK, Berggren K, Carter JH, Gancher ST, Hammerstad JP, Gordin A: Effect of peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa in parkinsonian patients. Neurology 1994;44:913–919.
  8. Routtinen HM, Rinne UK: Entacapone prolongs levodopa response in a one-month double-blind study in parkinsonian patients with levodopa-related fluctuations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:36–40.
  9. Stocchi F, De Pandis MF, Vacca L, Valente M, Brusa L, Ruggieri S: Entacapone efficacy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2000;15(suppl 3):127.
  10. Rinne UK, Larsen JP, Siden A, Worm-Peterson J: Entacapone enhances the response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations. Neurology 1998;51:186–189.
  11. Parkinson Study Group: Entacapone improves motor fluctuations in levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease patients. Ann Neurol 1997;42:747–755.
  12. Myllyla VV, Kultalahti E-R, Haapaniemi H, Leinonen M, the Filomen Study Group: Long-term safety of entacapone in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol, in press.
  13. Deuschl G, Poewe W, Poepping M, the Celomen Study Group: Efficacy and safety of entacapone as an adjunct to levodopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease (PD): Experience from the Austrian-German six months study. Parkinsonism-Related Disord 1999;5:75S.
  14. Haasio K, Sopanen L, Nissinen E, Heinonen EH: Comparison of the preclinical safety of COMT inhibitors. Mov Disord 2000;15(suppl 3):111.
  15. Nissinen E, Haasio K, Sopanen L, Heinonen EH: Effect of entacapone and tolcapone on mitochondrial function in vitro and in vivo. Mov Disord 2000;15(suppl 3):19.
  16. Fahn S, Elton RL, Members of the UPDRS Development Committee: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; in Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M (eds): Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease. Florham Park, Macmillan Health Care Information, 1987, vol 2, pp 153–163.
  17. Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R: PDQ-39: A review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson’s disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol 1998;245(suppl 1):S10–S14.
  18. Luer MS: Interventions to achieve tonic exposure to levodopa: Delaying or preventing the onset of motor complications. Pharmacotherapy 1999;19(11):169S–179S.
  19. Olanow CW, Obeso JA: Preventing levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Ann Neurol 2000;47:167–178.
  20. Rinne UK, Kieburtz K, Gordin A: Effect of entacapone on quality of life related assessments in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2000;15(suppl 3):135.
  21. Sagar H, Brooks D, UK-Irish Entacapone Study Group: The UK-Irish double-blind study of entacapone in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2000;15(suppl 3):135.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: February 16, 2001
Issue release date: February 2001

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 0014-3022 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9913 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ENE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.