Original Paper
Does Higher Concordance in Monozygotic Twins Than in Dizygotic Twins Suggest a Genetic Component?Guo S.-W.Max McGee National Research Center for Juvenile Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics and Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisc., USA
|
|
Do you have an account?
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more
Subscribe
- Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
- Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
- Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
Article / Publication Details
Published online: January 25, 2001
Issue release date: January 2001
Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 7
ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HHE
Abstract
It is widely regarded that twins can be used as a natural experiment to subject hypotheses to empirical testing regarding the contributions of genetic factors to phenotypic variability in human traits, especially behavioral traits. In genetic epidemiology, a higher concordance rate in monozygotic (MZ) twins than in dizygotic (DZ) twins is often taken as prima facie evidence for a genetic component. While twins studies have been used to estimate the contributions of genetic factors to phenotypic variability in human traits, the corresponding methodology that allows the estimation entails several crucial assumptions. The most critical is that MZ and DZ twins are equally similar environmentally. Although MZ twins are genetically more similar than DZ twins, they are often environmentally more similar. This paper demonstrates that, even in the complete absence of any genetic factor and of any biases, the greater environmental similarity alone in MZ twins can result in higher concordance rate in MZ twins than in DZ twins. This is especially true when there are multiple environmental factors, which may have multiple exposure levels and/or interact strongly, although each of them may be of low risk. This may serve as a sobering antidote to the uncritical reliance on twin studies without examining the validity of the underlying assumptions.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Bao W, Srinivasan SR, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS: Persistence of multiple cardiovascular risk clustering related to syndrome X from childhood to young adulthood. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1842–1847.
- Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Baldari G, Campese VM: Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in salt-sensitive patients with essential hypertension: Role of insulin. Am J Hypertens 1996;9:24–32.
- Hannah MC, Hopper JL, Mathews JD: Twin concordance for a binary trait. I. Statistical models illustrated with data on drinking status. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1983;32:127–137.
- Hilden J: Environmental health hazard handling: Statistical and strategic concerns. Clin Genet 1989;36:357–363.
-
Hopper JL: Twin concordance; in Armitage P, Colton T (eds): Human Genetics. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Chichester, Wiley, 1998, vol 5.
-
Hrubec Z: The effect of diagnostic ascertainment in twins of the assessment of the genetic factor in disease etiology. Am J Hum Genet 1978;25:15–28.
- Hrubec Z, Allen G: Methods and interpretation of twin concordance data. Am J Hum Genet 1975;27:808–809.
-
Kendler KS: Limitations of the ratio of concordance rates in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:477–478.
- Kendler KS, Eaves LJ: The estimation of probandwise concordance in twins: The effect of unequal ascertainment. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1989;38:253–270.
- Kendler KS, Holm NV: Differential enrollment in twin registries: Its effect on prevalence and concordance rates and estimates of genetic parameters. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1985;34:125–140.
-
Khoury P, Morrison JA, Kelly K, Mellies M, Horvitz R, Glueck CJ: Clustering and interrelationships of coronary heart disease risk factors in school children, ages 6–19. Am J Epidemiol 1980;12:524–538.
-
Lyons MJ: A twin study of self-reported criminal behaviour; in Genetics of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour. Ciba Foundation Symposium. Chichester, Wiley, 1995, vol 194, pp 61–75.
- Pam A, Kemker SS, Ross CA, Golden R: The ‘equal environments assumption’ in MZ-DZ twin comparison: An untenable premise of psychiatric genetics? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1996;45:349–360.
-
Penrose LS: Outline of Human Genetics, ed 3. New York, Crane, Russak & Company, 1973.
- Phillips DIW: Twin studies in medical research: Can they tell us whether diseases are genetically determined? Lancet 1993;341:1008–1009.
- Smith C: Heritability of liability and concordance in monozygous twins. Ann Hum Genet 1970;34:85–91.
-
Smith C: Correlation in liability among relatives and concordance in twins. Hum Hered 1972;22:97–101.
- Smith C: Concordance in twins: Methods and interpretation. Am J Hum Genet 1974;26:454–466.
- Stehbens WE: Causality in medical science with particular reference to heart disease and atherosclerosis. Perspect Biol Med 1992;36:97–119.
- Vanhala MJ, Kumpusalo EA, Pitkajarvi TK, Notkola IL, Takala JK: Hyperinsulinemia an clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged hypertensive Finnish men and women. J Hypertens 1997;15:475–481.
- Weiss KM: In search of human variation. Genome Res 1998;8:691–697.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: January 25, 2001
Issue release date: January 2001
Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 7
ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HHE
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
Get Permission
PubMed ID
