Predictors of Acute Child and Family Outcome following Traumatic Brain Injury in ChildrenAnderson V.A.a-c · Catroppa C.a-c · Haritou F.b,c · Morse S.b · Pentland L.b · Rosenfeld J.a-c · Stargatt R.b
aUniversity of Melbourne, bRoyal Children’s Hospital and cMurdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Objective: To examine the relative contributions of injury severity, level of physical and cognitive disability, child behavior and family function to short-term outcome 6 months following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children. Design: Prospective, longitudinal, between-group design, comparing preinjury and postinjury measures of functional outcome across three levels of injury severity. Subjects: One hundred and twelve children, aged 2–12 years admitted to the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, with a diagnosis of TBI. The sample was divided into three groups, according to injury severity: mild TBI (n = 31), moderate TBI (n = 52) and severe TBI (n = 29). Children with a history of neurologic, developmental and psychiatric disorder were excluded from participation. Main Outcome Measures: Levels of postinjury functioning in the following domains: physical function, cognitive ability (incorporating intellect, memory and attention), behavioral and family functioning, and level of family burden. Results: A clear dose-response relationship for physical and cognitive outcomes was found, with severe TBI associated with greater impairment of physical, intellectual, memory and attentional function. For psychosocial outcome, results were less clearly linked to injury severity. Preinjury behavioral and family functioning were closely related to postinjury function in these domains, with an interaction identified between family function and child behavior at 6 months postinjury. Family functioning remained unchanged postinjury, although level of burden was high, and predicted by injury severity, functional impairment and postinjury behavioral disturbance. Conclusions: These results suggest ongoing functional problems for the child and significant family burden 6 months following TBI. The nature and severity of physical and cognitive problems are most closely related to injury severity, with family functioning and child behavior better predicted by psychosocial and premorbid factors.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
Kraus JF: Epidemiological features of brain injury in children; in Broman SH, Michel ME (eds): Traumatic Head Injury in Children. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 165–187.
Fletcher J, Ewing-Cobbs L, Francis D, Levin H: Variability in outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children: A developmental perspective; in Broman SH, Michel ME (eds): Traumatic Head Injury in Children. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 3–21.
- Jaffe KM, Polissar NL, Fay GC, Liao S: Recovery trends over three years following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:17–26.
- Klonoff H: Head injuries in children: Predisposing factors, accident conditions, accident proneness and sequelae. Amer J Pub Health 1971;61:2405–2417.
Levin H, Eisenberg H: Neuropsychological impairment after closed head injury in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol 1979;4:389–402.
- Rutter M, Chadwick O, Shaffer D, Brown G: A prospective study of children with head injuries. I. Design and methods. Psychol Med 1980;10:633–646.
Groom KN, Shaw TG, O’Connor ME, Howard NI, Pickens A: Neurobehavioral symptoms and family functioning in traumatically brain-injured adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998;13:695–711.
- McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR, Martinage DP, Marshall MM: The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured person. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:527–533.
Anderson V, Moore C: Age at injury as a predictor of outcome following pediatric head injury. Child Neuropsychol 1995;1:187–202.
- Anderson V, Morse SA, Klug G, Catroppa C, Haritou F, Rosenfeld J, Pentland L: Predicting recovery from head injury in school-aged children: A prospective analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:568–580.
Dennis M: Language and the young damaged brain; in Boll T, Bryant B (eds): Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement and Practice. Washington, American Psychological Association, 1989, pp 85–124.
- Ewing-Cobbs L, Fletcher J, Levin H, Francis D, Davidson K, Miner M: Longitudinal neuropsychological outcome in infants and preschoolers with traumatic head injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:581–591.
- Gronwall D, Wrightson P, McGinn V: Effect of mild head injury during the preschool years. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:592–597.
- Taylor HG, Alden J: Age-related differences in outcomes following childhood brain insults: An introduction and overview. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:555–567.
Brooks N: Closed Head Injury: Psychological, Social and Family Consequences. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985.
Perrot SB, Taylor HG, Montes JL: Neuropsychological sequelae, family stress, and environmental adaptation following pediatric head injury. Dev Neuropsychol 1991;7:69–86.
- Rivara JB, Jaffe KM, Fay GC, Polissar NL, Martin KM, Shurtleff HA, Liao S: Family functioning and injury severity as predictors of child functioning one year following traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1047–1055.
- Rivara JB, Jaffe KM, Polissar NL, Fay GC, Martin KM, Shurtless HA, Liao S: Family functioning and children’s academic performance in the year following traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:369–379.
Taylor HG, Drotar D, Wade S, Yeates K, Stancin T, Klein S: Recovery from traumatic brain injury in children: The importance of the family; in Broman S, Michel ME (eds): Traumatic Head Injury in Children. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 188–218.
- Hall KM, Karzmark P, Stephens M, Englander J, O’Hare P, Wright J: Family stressors in traumatic brain injury: A two year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:876–883.
Anderson-Parente JK, DiCesare A, Parente R: Spouses who stayed. Cog Rehabil 1990;8:22–25.
- Rivara J, Fay G, Jaffe K, Polssar N, Shurtless H, Liao S: Predictors of family functioning one year following traumatic head injury in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:899–910.
- Thomsen IV: Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: A 10–15 year second follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:260–268.
- Wade S, Taylor HG, Drotar D, Stancin T, Yeates K: Childhood traumatic brain injury: Initial impact on the family. J Learn Disabil 1996;29:652–666.
- Donders J: Premorbid behavioral and psychosocial adjustment of children with traumatic brain injury. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1992;20:233–246.
Prior M, Kinsella G, Sawyer M, Bryan D, Anderson V: Cognitive and psychosocial outcomes after head injury in childhood. Austral Psychol 1994;29:116–123.
- Brown G, Chadwick O, Shaffer D, Rutter M, Traub M: A prospective study of children with head injuries. III. Psychiatric sequelae. Psychol Med 1981;11:49–62.
Rutter M, Chadwick O, Shaffer D: Head injury; in Rutter M (ed): Developmental Neuropsychiatry. New York, Guilford, 1983, pp 83–111.
Brink J, Imbus C, Woo-Sam J: Physical recovery after closed head trauma in children and adolescents. J Pediatr 1980;97:721–727.
Max J, Castillo C, Robin D, Lindgren S, Smith W, Sato Y, Mattheis P, Stierwalt J: Predictors of family functioning following traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:83–90.
Taylor HG, Yeates KO, Wade S, Drotar D, Klein S, Stancin T: Influences on first-year recovery from traumatic brain injury in children. Neuropsychology, in press.
- Yeates K, Taylor HG, Drotar D, Wade S, Stancin T, Klein S: Pre-injury environment as a determinant of recovery from traumatic brain injuries in school-aged children. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:617–630.
Teasdale G, Jennet B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 1974;ii:81–84.
Jennet B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;i:480–484.
Daniel A: Power, Privilege and Prestige: Occupations in Australia. Melbourne, Longman-Cheshire, 1983.
Sparrow S, Balla D, Cicchetti D: The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Interview Edition, Survey Form Manual. Circle Pines, American Guidance Services, 1984.
- Rowe KJ, Rowe KS: The relationship between inattentiveness in the classroom and reading achievement. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992;31:357–368.
Lachar D: Personality Inventory for Children (PIC) (Revised formal manual supplement). Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services, 1992.
Noller P: ICPS Family Functioning Scales, unpublished manuscript. University of Queensland, 1988.
Wechsler D: Manual for the Preschool and Primary Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York, Psychological Corporation, 1987.
Wechsler D: Manual for the Wechsler Scale of Children’s Intelligence, version III. New York, Psychological Corporation, 1991.
Kaufman A: Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York, Wiley & Sons, 1979.
Anderson VA, Lajoie G, Bell R: Neuropsychological assessment of the school aged child. Melbourne, University of Melbourne, 1995.
Christensen A: Luria’s neuropsychological investigation. Munksgard, Schmidts Bobtrykkeri Vogens, 1979.
Lhermitte J, Signoret JL: Analyse neuropsychologique et differenciation des syndromes amnesiques. Rev Neuropsychol 1972;74:20–38.
Adams W, Sheslow D: Manual for the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning Test. Wilmington, Jastak, 1989.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.