Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Original Paper
Evolution of the Cerebellum in Primates: Differences in Relative Volume among Monkeys, Apes and HumansRilling J.K.a · Insel T.R.baDepartment of Anthropology and Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga., bDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga., USA
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Access via DeepDyve
- Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article
- Organize, annotate And mark up articles
- Printing And downloading restrictions apply
Article / Publication Details
Published online: November 06, 1998
Issue release date: December 1998
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 1
ISSN: 0006-8977 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9743 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BBE
Abstract
According to the ‘developmental constraint hypothesis’ of comparative mammalian neuroanatomy, brain structures enlarge predictably as the entire brain grows both ontogenetically and phylogenetically. In this study, brain and cerebellum volumes are measured from in vivo magnetic resonance scans of 44 primates from 11 haplorhine species. After controlling for overall brain volume, the cerebellum in both pongid and hylobatid apes is, on average, 45% larger than in monkeys. These results demonstrate that all primate brains are not similarly organized and that developmental constraints are not tight enough to preclude selection for increased cerebellar volume independent of selection on overall brain size.
Related Articles:
References
-
Altman, J., and S.A. Bayer (1997) The Cerebellar System in Relation to its Evolution, Structure, and Functions. CRC Press, New York.
-
Deacon, T.W. (1990) Rethinking mammalian brain evolution. Amer. Zool., 30: 629–705.
-
Falk, D. (1980) Hominid brain evolution: the approach from paleoneurology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 23: 93–107.
- Finlay, B.L., and R.B. Darlington (1995) Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science, 268: 1578–1584.
- Gebo, D.L., L. MacLatchy, R. Kityo, A. Deino, J. Kingston, and D. Pilbeam (1997) A hominoid genus from the early miocene of Unganda. Science, 276: 401–404.
-
Ghez, C. (1991) The cerebellum. In Principles of Neural Science (ed. 3) (ed. by E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz, and T.M. Jessel), Elsevier, New York, pp. 626–646.
-
Haines, D.E. (1986) The primate cerebellum. In Comparative Primate Biology. Systematics, Evolution and Anatomy, Vol. 1 (ed. by D.R. Swindler and J. Erwin), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 491–535.
-
Hollihn, U. (1984) Bimanual suspensory behavior: morphology, selective advantages and phylogeny. In The Lesser Apes (ed. by H. Preushoft, D.J. Chivers, W.Y. Brockelman, and N. Creel), Edinburg University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 85–95.
-
Holloway, R.L. (1992) the failure of the gyrification index to account for volumetric reorganization in the evolution of the human brain. Journal of Human Evolution, 22: 163–170.
-
Jerison, H.J. (1973) Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. Academic Press, New York.
-
Jerison, H.J. (1997). Evolution of prefrontal cortex. In Development of the Prefrontal Cortex: Evolution, Neurobilogy, and Behavior (ed. by N.A. Krasnegor, G.R. Lyon, and P.S. Goldman-Rakic), Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, pp. 9–26.
-
Martin, R.D., and P.H. Harvey (1985) Brain size allometry: ontogeny and phylogeny. In Size and Scaling in Primate Biology (ed. by W.L. Jungers), Plenum, New York, pp. 147–173.
- Matano, S., and E. Hirasaki (1997) Volumetric comparisons in the cerebellar complex of anthropoids, with special reference to locomotor types. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 103: 173–183.
-
Napier, J., and P. Napier (1985) The Natural History of Primates. MIT Press, Cambridge.
- Ott, I., M. Schleidt, and J. Kien (1994) Temporal organization of action in baboons: comparisons with the temporal segmentation in chimpanzee and human behavior. Brain Behav. Evol., 44: 101–107.
-
Preuss, T.M. (1993) The role of the neurosciences in primate evolutionary biology. In Primates and Their Relatives in Phylogenetic Perspective (ed. by R.D.E. MacPhee), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 333–362.
- Radinsky, L. (1975) Primate brain evolution. American Scientist, 63: 656–663.
-
Stephan, H., G. Baron, and H.D. Fram (1988) Comparative size of brain and brain components. Comparative Primate Biology, 4: 1–38.
-
Stephan, H., R. Bauchot, and O. Andy (1970) Data on size of the brain and of various brain parts in insectivores and primates. In The Primate Brain: Advances in Primatology (ed. by M. Noback), Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp. 289–297.
- Stephan, H., H. Frahm, and G. Baron (1981) New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. Folia Primatol., 35: 1–29.
-
Stephan, H., and P. Pirlot (1970) Volumetric Comparisons of Brain Structures in Bats. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. Forsch., 8: 200–236.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: November 06, 1998
Issue release date: December 1998
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 1
ISSN: 0006-8977 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9743 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BBE
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission