Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Original Paper

The Scaling of White Matter to Gray Matter in Cerebellum and Neocortex

Bush E.C. · Allman J.M.

Author affiliations

Biology Division, California Institute of Technology, MC 216-76, Pasadena, Calif., USA

Related Articles for ""

Brain Behav Evol 2003;61:1–5

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 9.00 *
EUR 8.00 *
USD 9.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve

  • Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article
  • Organize, annotate And mark up articles
  • Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: October 03, 2002
Accepted: November 26, 2002
Published online: March 13, 2003
Issue release date: February 2003

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0006-8977 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9743 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BBE

Abstract

It is known that the white matter of neocortex increases disproportionately with brain size. However, relatively few measurements have been made of white matter/gray matter scaling in the cerebellum. We present data on the volumes of white and gray matter in both structures, taken from 45 species of mammals. We find a scaling exponent of 1.13 for cerebellum and 1.28 for neocortex. The 95% confidence intervals for our estimates of these two exponents do not overlap. This difference likely reflects differences in the connectivity and/or micro-structure of white matter in the two regions.

© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Allman, J. (1999) Evolving Brains. Scientific American Books, New York.
  2. Andersen, B., L. Korbo, and B. Pakkenberg (1992) A quantitative study of the human cerebellum with unbiased stereological techniques. J. Comp. Neurol., 326: 549–560.
  3. Braitenberg, V., D. Heck, and F. Sultan (1997) The detection and generation of sequences as a key to cerebellar function: Experiments and theory. Behav. Brain Sci., 20: 229–77.
  4. Campos, G., and W. Welker (1976) Comparisons between brains of a large and a small hystricomorph rodent – capybara, Hydrochoerus and guinea-pig, Cavia – neocortical projection regions and measurements of brain subdivisions. Brain Behav. Evol., 13: 243–266.
  5. Changizi, M. (2001) Principles underlying mammalian neocortical scaling. Biol. Cyber., 84:207–215.
  6. Frahm, H. D., H. Stephan, and M. Stephan (1982) Comparison of brain structure volumes in Insectivora and Primates. I. neocortex. J. Hirnforsch., 23: 375–389.
  7. Gundersen, H., E. Jensen, K. Kieu, and J. Nielsen (1999) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology reconsidered. J. Microsc., 193: 199–211.
  8. Jolicoeur, P. (1968) Interval estimation of the slope of the major axis of a bivariate normal distribution in the case of a small sample. Biometrics, 24: 679–682.
  9. Korbo, L., B. Andersen, O. Ladefoged, and A. Moller (1993) Total numbers of various cell types in rat cerebellar cortex estimated using an unbiased stereological method. Brain Res., 609:262–268.
  10. Kretschmann, H. J., U. Tafesse, and A. Herrmann (1982) Different volume changes of cerebral cortex and white matter during histological preparation. Microsc. Acta, 86: 13–24.
  11. Olivares, R., J. Montiel, and F. Aboitiz (2001) Species differences and similarities in the fine structure of the mammalian corpus callosum. Brain Behav. Evol., 57: 98–105.
  12. Ramon y Cajal, S. (1888) Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las aves. Rev. Trimestr. Histol. 1:1–10.
  13. Rilling, J. K., and T.R. Insel (1999) The primate neocortex in comparative perspective using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Hum. Evol. 37:191–223.
  14. Schlenska, G. (1974) Volumen und Oberflächenmessungen an Gehirnen verschiedener Säugetiere im Vergleich zu einem errechneten Modell. J. Hirnforsch., 15: 401–408.
  15. Schuz, A., and H. Preissl (1996) Basic connectivity of the cerebral cortex and some considerations on the corpus callosum. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 20: 567–570.
    External Resources
  16. Shinoda, Y., Y. Sugiuchi, T. Futami, and R. Izawa (1992) Axon collaterals of mossy fibers from the pontine nucleus in the cerebellar dentate nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 67: 547–560.
  17. Stephan, H., G. Baron, and H. Frahm (1991) Insectivora. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  18. Sultan, F. (2002) Brain evolution – analysis of mammalian brain architecture. Nature, 415:133–134.
  19. Wu, H., I. Sugihara, and Y. Shinoda (1999) Projection patterns of single mossy fibers originating from the lateral reticular nucleus in the rat cerebellar cortex and nuclei. J. Comp. Neurol., 411:97–118.
  20. Zhang, K., and T. Sejnowski (2000) A universal scaling law between gray matter and white matter of cerebral cortex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97: 5621–5626.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: October 03, 2002
Accepted: November 26, 2002
Published online: March 13, 2003
Issue release date: February 2003

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0006-8977 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9743 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BBE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP