Original Research Article
Factor Structure of a Modified Version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: An Analysis of Executive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive ImpairmentNagahama Y.a · Okina T.a · Suzuki N.b · Matsuzaki S.b · Yamauchi H.c · Nabatame H.b · Matsuda M.a
aDepartment of Geriatric Neurology, Shiga Medical Center, Moriyama, bDepartment of Neurology and cResearch Institute, Shiga Medical Center, Shiga, Japan
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
In order to explore the factor structure of a modified version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (mWCST) and to identify the dimensions of deficit in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), conventional mWCST scores in 55 AD patients, 17 MCI patients, and 22 controls were subjected to factor analysis. Three factors, perseveration, inefficient sorting, and nonperseverative error, were obtained. Perseveration score was significantly poorer in both AD and MCI than in controls. By contrast, the MCI group showed significantly poorer scores on the nonperseverative error factor than did the AD patients, and the controls yielded intermediate values between the two patient groups. The perseveration factor was significantly correlated with the other estimates of executive function. This study suggested that the many mWCST scores could be reduced to three major factors, and that the perseveration score may effectively represent an aspect of executive dysfunction in AD and MCI patients.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Grady CL, Haxby JV, Horwitz B, Sundaram M, Berg G, Schapiro M, Friedland RP, Rapoport SI: Longitudinal study of the early neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic changes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1988;10:576–596.
- Hodges JR, Patterson K: Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:441–459.
- Levine DN, Lee JM, Fisher CM: The visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease: A clinicopathologic case study. Neurology 1993;43:305–313.
- Victoroff J, Ross GW, Benson DF, Verity MA, Vinters HV: Posterior cortical atrophy: Neuropathologic correlations. Arch Neurol 1994;51:269–274.
- Greene JDW, Patterson K, Xuereb J, Hodges JR: Alzheimer disease and nonfluent progressive aphasia. Arch Neurol 1996;53:1072–1078.
- Perry RJ, Hodges JR: Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. Brain 1999;122:383–404.
- Binetti G, Magni E, Padovani A, Cappa SF, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M: Executive dysfunction in early Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:91–93.
- Hänninen T, Hallikainen M, Koivisto K, Partanen K, Laakso MP, Riekkinen PJ, Soininen H: Decline of frontal lobe functions in subjects with age-associated memory impairment. Neurology 1997;48:148–153.
Grant DA, Berg EA: A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. J Exp Psychol 1948;38:404–411.
- Drewe EA: The effect of type and area of brain lesion on Wisconsin card sorting test performance. Cortex 1974;10:159–170.
Milner B: Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Arch Neurol 1963;9:90–100.
- Robinson AL, Heaton RK, Lehman RAW, Stilson DW: The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1980;48:605–614.
Bondi MW, Monsch AU, Butters N, Salmon DP, Paulsen JS: Utility of a modified version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in the detection of dementia of the Alzheimer type. Clin Neuropsychol 1993;7:161–170.
- Paolo AM, Axelrod BN, Tröster AI, Blackwell KT, Koller WC: Utility of a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test short form in persons with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996;18:892–897.
- Dehaene S, Changeux JP: The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network. Cereb Cortex 1991;1:62–79.
- Anderson SW, Damasio H, Jones RD, Tranel D: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991;13:909–922.
Heaton RK: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Odessa, Florida, 1981.
- Bell MD, Greig TC, Kaplan E, Bryson G: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test dimensions in schizophrenia: Factorial, predictive, and divergent validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997;19:933–941.
Cuesta MJ, Peralta V, Caro F, de Leon J: Schizophrenic syndrome and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test dimensions. Psychiatry Res 1995;58:45–51.
- Koren D, Seidman LJ, Harrison RH, Lyons MJ, Kremen WS, Caplan B, Goldstein JM, Faraone SV, Tsuang MT: Factor structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Dimensions of deficit in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 1998;12:289–302.
- Sullivan EV, Mathalon DH, Zipursky RB, Kersteen-Tucker Z, Knight RT, Pfefferbaum A: Factors of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as measures of frontal-lobe function in schizophrenia and in chronic alcoholism. Psychiatry Res 1992;46:175–199.
- Nelson HE: A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 1976;12:313–324.
de Zubicaray G, Ashton R: Nelson’s (1976) modified card sorting test: A review. Clin Neuropsychol 1996;10:245–254.
- Robinson I, Kester D, Saykin A, Kaplan E, Gur R: Comparison of two short forms of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1992;6:27–33.
Jenkins R, Parsons O: Cognitive deficits in male alcoholics as measured by a modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Alcohol Tech Rep 1978;7:76–83.
Greve KW, Smith MC: A comparison of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test with the modified card sorting test for use with older adults. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 1991;11:57–65.
Nagahama Y, Fukuyama H, Yamauchi H, Matsuzaki S, Konishi J, Shibasaki H, Kimura J: Cerebral activation during performance of a card sorting test. Brain 1996;119:1667–1675.
- Nagahama Y, Fukuyama H, Yamauchi H, Katsumi Y, Magata Y, Shibasaki H, Kimura J: Age-related changes in cerebral blood flow activation during a card sorting test. Exp Brain Res 1997;114:571–577.
- Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rabins PV, Ritchie K, Rossor M, Thal L, Winblad B: Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985–1992.
- Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 3, revised. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
- McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939–944.
- Petersen RC, Stevens JC, Ganguli M, Tangalos EG, Cummings JL, DeKosky ST: Practical parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review). Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001;56:1133–1142.
- Zung WW, Richards CB, Short MJ: Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic. Further validation of the SDS. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965;13:508–515.
- Seidman LJ, Pepple JR, Faraone SV, Kremen WS, Cassens G, McCarley RW, Tsuang MT: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test over time in schizophrenia: Preliminary evidence from clinical follow-up and neuroleptic reduction studies. Schizophrenia Res 1991;5:233–242.
- Hotz G, Helm-Estabrooks N: Perseveration. 1. A review. Brain Inj 1995;9:151–159.
Parker D, Crawford J: Assessment of frontal lobe dysfunction; in Crawford J, Parker D, McKinlay W (eds): A Handbook of Neuropsychological Assessment. Hove, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992, pp 267–291.
Stevens JP: Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, ed 4. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
- Lafleche G, Albert MS: Executive function deficits in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 1995;9:313–320.
Sahgal A, Galloway PH, McKeith IG, Edwardson JA, Lloyd S: A comparative study of attentional deficits in senile dementias of Alzheimer and Lewy body types. Dementia 1992;3:350–354.
- Tabert MH, Albert SM, Borukhova-Milov L, Camacho Y, Pelton G, Liu X, Stern Y, Devanand DP: Functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Prediction of AD. Neurology 2002;58:758–764.
- Iversen SD, Mishkin M: Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Exp Brain Res 1970;11:376–386.
- Stuss DT, Benson DF, Kaplan EF, Weir WS, Naeser MA, Lieberman I, Ferrill D: The involvement of orbitofrontal cerebrum in cognitive tasks. Neuropsychologia 1983;21:235–248.
- Nagahama Y, Sadato N, Yamauchi H, Katsumi Y, Hayashi T, Fukuyama H, Kimura J, Shibasaki H, Yonekura Y: Neural activity during attention shifts between object features. Neuroreport 1998;9:2633–2638.
- Parkin AJ, Lawrence A: A dissociation in the relation between memory tasks and frontal lobe tests in the normal elderly. Neuropsychologia 1994;32:1523–1532.
- Hartman M, Bolton E, Fehnel SE: Accounting for age differences on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Decreased working memory, not inflexibility. Psychol Aging 2001;16:385–399.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.