European Addiction Research

Research Report

Estimated Trends in the Prevalence of Heroin Addiction in Switzerland

A Multiple-Indicator Approach

Maag V.

Author affiliations

Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Main Unit Substance Abuse and AIDS, Bern, Switzerland

Related Articles for ""

Eur Addict Res 2003;9:176–181

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Research Report

Published online: September 17, 2003
Issue release date: October 2003

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1022-6877 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9891 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/EAR

Abstract

Data on the prevalence of heroin addiction have considerable relevance in the field of public health as a means of evaluating measures aimed at improving the lives of the individuals concerned. The number of heroin addicts in Switzerland was estimated by six different methods based on various data sources. This resulted in an overall estimate for the reference year 1997 ranging from a minimum of 24,000 to a maximum of 35,000 heroin addicts. In the 1990s, the trend in the prevalence of heroin addiction was characterised by a rapid rise up to 1993/94 followed by a gradual decline. The increasing medicalisation (focus on treatment rather than on punishment) of Switzerland’s heroin problem has therefore not translated into a clear downward trend in the estimated prevalence of heroin addiction; however, the data for the various sub-groups lend plausibility to the assumption that this population is more integrated, less conspicuous and receiving better medical care.

© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction: Annual Report 2001 on the State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union. Lisbon, European Communities, 2001.
  2. Bundesamt für Gesundheitswesen: Massnahmen des Bundes zur Verminderung der Drogenprobleme. Bundesratsbeschluss vom 20. Februar 1991. Ein Grundlagenpapier des Bundesamtes für Gesundheitswesen. Bern, BAG, 1991.
  3. Hartnoll R, Lewis R, Mitcheson M: Estimating the prevalence of opioid dependence. Lancet 1985;203–205.
  4. Hickman M, Cox S, Harvey J, Howes S, Farrell M, Frischer M, Stimson G, Taylor C: Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in inner London. Addiction 1999;94:1653–1662.
  5. Hser I-Y: Population Estimates of Intravenous Drug Users and HIV Infection in Los Angeles County. Int J Addictions 1993;28:695–709.
  6. Wickens TD: Quantitative Methods for Estimating the Size of a Drug-using Population. J Drug Issues 1993;23:185–216.
  7. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction: Estimating the Prevalence of Problem Drug Use in Europe. Luxembourg, EMCDDA Scientific Monograph Series no 1, 1997.
  8. Institut für Therapieforschung: Expertise über Schätzverfahren zum Umfang der Drogenproblematik in Deutschland. Munich, IFT-Berichte Bd. 71, 1993.
  9. Simon R, Kraus L, Bauernfein R: National prevalence estimates. Improvement of comparability of national estimates of addiction prevalence. Munich, IFT, 1996.
  10. Bühringer G, Adelsberger F, Heinemann A, Kirschner J, Knauss I, Kraus L, Püschel K, Simon R: Schätzverfahren und Schätzungen 1997 zum Umfang der Drogenproblematik in Deutschland. Sucht, Sonderheft 2, 1997.
  11. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA): Study to Obtain Comparable National Estimates of Problem Drug Use Prevalence for all EU Member States. Lisbon, EMCDDA, 1999.
  12. Magura S, Sung-Yeon K: Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use in High Risk Populations: A Meta-Analytical Review. Subst Use Misuse 1996;31:1131–1153.
  13. Frischer M: Estimating the prevalence of drug abuse using the mortality multiplier method: An overview, in European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction: Estimating the Prevalence of Problem Drug Use in Europe. Luxembourg, EMCDDA, 1997, pp 113–126.
  14. Müller T, Grob P: Medizinische und soziale Aspekte der offenen Drogenszene Platzspitz in Zürich 1991. Vergleichende repräsentative Befragung von 758 DrogenkonsumentInnen. Zürich, unpublished report by Zurich University Hospital, 1992.
  15. Künzler HP: Analyse der offenen Drogenszene ‘Platzspitz’ in Zürich. Zurich, Dissertation, 1993.
  16. Braun N: Die Berner Drogenszene. Berne, Haupt, 1995.
  17. Maag V: Prävalenz der Heroinabhängigkeit in der Schweiz: Schätzmethoden und Schätzergebnisse. Berne, master’s thesis, 2000.
  18. Klingemann H: Harm Reduction and Abstinence: Swiss Drug Policy at a Time of Transition, in Klingemann H, Hunt G: Drug Treatment Systems in an International Perspective. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1998, pp. 94–111.
  19. Lanz A, Steffen K: Evaluationsbericht der Kontakt- und Anlaufstellen für Drogengebraucher/innen für die Pilotphase 1988–1990 im Kontext der Drogenszene in Zürich. Zurich, Institut für Suchtforschung, 1990.
  20. Christen L, Christen S: Eintritts- und Verlaufsmerkmale von Teilnehmern und Teilnehmerinnen an einer methadongestützten Behandlung mit niedrigschwelligem Eintritt. Zurich, ARUD, 1996.
  21. Estermann J, Herrmann U, Hügi D, Nydegger B: Sozialepidemiologie des Drogenkonsums. Zu Prävalenz und Inzidenz des Heroin- und Kokaingebrauchs und dessen polizeiliche Verfolgung. Lucerne, Orlux, 1996.
  22. Knolle H: The Heroin/Cocaine Epidemic in Switzerland 1979–1997: A Mathematical Analysis of Law Enforcement Data. Substance Use & Misuse 1999;34:1117–1136.
  23. Zwahlen M, Neuenschwander B: Letter to the editor: Zunehmender Heroin- und Kokainkonsum in der Schweiz seit 1990: Anwendung eines verallgemeinerten Poisson-Ansatzes auf Anzeigedaten. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin 1997;42:321–323.
  24. Gmel G, Maag V: Zunahme des Konsums illegaler Drogen in der Schweiz? Vergleiche der Schweizerischen Gesundheitsbefragungen 1992/93 und 1997. Abhängigkeiten 1999;5:67–77.
  25. Maxwell JC: Methods for Estimating the Number of ‘Hard-Core’ Drug Users. J Substance Abuse 2000;35:399–420.
  26. Frischer M, Hickman M, Kraus L, Mariani F, Wiessing L: A comparison of different methods for estimating the prevalence of problematic drug misuse in Great Britain. Addiction 2001;96:1465–1476.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Research Report

Published online: September 17, 2003
Issue release date: October 2003

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1022-6877 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9891 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/EAR


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP