Respiration

Clinical Investigations

Polymorphonuclear Elastase in the Early Diagnosis of Complicated Pyogenic Pleural Effusions

Alemán C.a · Alegre J.a · Segura R.M.b · Armadans L.c · Suriñach J.M.a · Varela E.b · Soriano T.a · Recio J.a · Fernández de Sevilla T.a

Author affiliations

Departments of aInternal Medicine, bBiochemistry and cPreventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital General Vall d’Hebron, Autonomous University, Barcelona, Spain

Related Articles for ""

Respiration 2003;70:462–467

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Investigations

Received: February 22, 2003
Accepted: March 31, 2003
Published online: December 05, 2003
Issue release date: September – October

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES

Abstract

Background: Polymorphonuclear elastase (PMN-E) is a neutrophilic marker that has been implicated in acute inflammatory responses. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of PMN-E in the diagnosis of complicated pyogenic effusions. Patients and Method: We studied 536 patients with pleural effusion of various etiologies. There were 125 pyogenic bacterial effusions (42 typical parapneumonic, 17 borderline complicated parapneumonic and 66 complicated parapneumonic or empyema), 83 tuberculous, 91 malignant, 42 paramalignant, 95 transudates, 28 miscellaneous and 72 effusions of unknown origin. Classic markers (pH, glucose, proteins, adenosine deaminase, LDH, leukocytes and differential count) and the PMN-E level were quantified in pleural fluid. The accuracy of PMN-E as an early marker in the diagnosis of complicated pyogenic infectious effusions was evaluated among pleural effusions that were not diagnosed with classic biochemical markers, radiological findings or Gram stain. Since results of pleural fluid culture and cytological examination are generally available after a 48-hour delay, they were not included as early markers in the initial diagnosis of pleural effusions. Results: Early diagnosis of complicated pyogenic bacterial effusions was achieved in only 48 of 66 cases with classic markers. Among those that were not diagnosed with these parameters, a pleural PMN-E value >3,500 µg/l discriminated between complicated and noncomplicated pyogenic bacterial effusions with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 97%. Conclusions: PMN-E is useful in the early diagnosis and management of complicated pyogenic infectious effusions, which may be delayed with classic markers.

© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Marel M, Stastny B, Melinová L, et al: Diagnosis of pleural effusions. Experience with clinical studies, 1986 to 1990. Chest 1995;107:1598–1603.
  2. Valdés L, Alvarez D, Valle JM, et al: The etiology of pleural effusions in an area with high incidence of tuberculosis. Chest 1996;109:158–162.
  3. Strange C, Sahn S: The definitions and epidemiology of pleural space infection. Semin Respir Infect 1999;14:3–8.
  4. Hamm H, Light RW: Parapneumonic effusion and empyema. Eur Respir J 1997;10:1150–1156.
  5. Light R: A new classification of parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Chest 1995;108:299–301.
  6. Heffner J: Indications for draining a parapneumonic effusion: An evidence-based approach. Semin Respir Infect 1999;14:48–58.
  7. Segura RM, Alegre J, Varela E, et al: Interleukin-8 and markers of neutrophil degranulation in pleural effusion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:1565–1572.
  8. Janoff AJ: Elastase and tissue injury. Annu Rev Med 1985;36:207–216.
  9. Weiss SJ: Tissue destruction by neutrophils. N Engl J Med 1989;320:365–376.
  10. Alegre J, Suriñach JM, Varela E, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid polymorphonuclear elastase in the differentiation between pyogenic bacterial infectious and non-infectious pleural effusions. Respiration 2000;67:426–432.
  11. Ebert W, Bauer H, Bauer E, et al: Significance of microbiological and biochemical analyses in empyema thoracis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;38:348–351.
  12. Light RW, MacGregor I, Luchsinger PC, et al: Pleural effusion: The diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:507–513.
  13. Ocaña I, Martinez Vazquez JM, Segura RM, et al: Adenosine deaminase in pleural fluids: Test for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion. Chest 1983;83:51–53.
  14. Bouros D, Schiza S, Siafakas N: Utility of fibrinolytic agents for draining intrapleural infections. Semin Respir Infect 1999;14:39–47.
  15. Bouros D, Schiza S, Patsurakis G, et al: Intrapleural streptokinase versus urokinase in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:291–295.
  16. Davies R, Traill Z, Gleeson F: Randomised controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase in community acquired pleural infection. Thorax 1997;52:416–421.
  17. Heffner J, Brown L, Barbieri C, et al: Pleural fluid chemical analysis in parapneumonic effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:1700–1708.
  18. Jurado B: Neumonía y derrame pleural. Manejo terapéutico. An Med Intern 1997;14:419–424.
  19. Bryant R, Salmon C: Pleural empyema. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:747–764.
  20. Jébrack G, Pointet P, Pichot MH: Purulent pleurisy and empyema. With the exception of pleural tuberculosis. Presse Méd 1998;3:1924–1931.
  21. Heffner JE, Mac Donald J, Barbieri C, Klein J: Management of parapneumonic effusions. Arch Surg 1995;130:433–438.
  22. Sahn S: Management of complicated parapneumonic effusions. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:813–817.
  23. Light RW, Girard EM, Jenkinson SG, et al: Parapneumonic effusions. Am J Med 1980;69:507–512.
  24. Martínez MA, Cordero PJ, Cases E, et al: Prognostic features of residual pleural thickening in metapneumonic pleural effusions (in Spanish). Arch Bronconeumol 1999;35:108–112.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Investigations

Received: February 22, 2003
Accepted: March 31, 2003
Published online: December 05, 2003
Issue release date: September – October

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP