Percutaneous Therapy of Varicocele: Effects on Semen Parameters in Young AdultsPolito Jr M.a · Muzzonigro G.a · Centini R.b · Candelari R.b · Antico E.b · Boscaro M.c · Mantero F.d · Ricciardo-Lamonica G.e · Balercia G.c
Departments of aUrology, bRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging, and cEndocrinology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ancona, Ancona; dEndocrinology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, and eDepartment of Economy, School of Economy, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: In spite of many years of debate, the impact of varicocele on male infertility is still controversial since its pathogenetic role on the impairment of semen quality has never been fully demonstrated. Methods: In the present work, a series of 426 young adult males undergoing percutaneous treatment of varicocele were studied and semen parameters were evaluated at baseline and 12 months of follow-up. Results: A significant increase in sperm cell concentration and a decrease in immotile spermatozoa were found after varicocele repair, but we failed to detect any significant positive change in progressive motility as well in sperm morphology after treatment. Similar results were also obtained when semen parameters were correlated with the degree of varicocele. Conclusion: Since a spontaneous improvement in semen quality has been mathematically established as a model of regression toward the mean, we conclude that the correction of varicocele in young adults is not a major indication when semen alteration is the only clinical problem.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Silber SJ: The varicocele dilemma. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:70–77.
- Raget JC, Unger C, Da Rugna D, et al: Long term results of varicocelectomy. Urol Int 1992;48:327–331.
- World Health Organization: The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1289–1293.
- Marmar JL, Kim Y: Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: A technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol 1994;152:1127–1132.
- Madjar I, Weissemberg R, Lunenfeld B et al: Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril 1995;63:120–124.
- Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, Behre HM: Treatment of varicocele: Counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod 1995;10:347–353.
- Girardi SK, Goldstein M: Varicocele. Curr Ther Endocrinol Metab 1997;6:355–358.
- Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, et al: Update on treatment of varicocele: Counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2147–2150.
- Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Cayan S, Kandireali E, Erdemir F, Tellaloglu S: Microsurgiucal inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men. Urology 2001;57:328–333.
Skoog SJ, Roberts KP: Goldstein M, et al: The adolescent varicocele: What’s new with an old problem in young patients? Padiatrics 1997;100:112–118.
- Niedzielski J, Paduch DA: Recurrence of varicocele after high retroperitoneal repair: Implications of intraoperative venography. J Urol 2001;165:937–940.
- Pianalto B, Bonanni G, Martella S, Renier M, Ancona E: Results of laparoscopic bilateral varicocelectomy. Ann Ital Chir 2000;71:587–591.
- Pieri S, Minucci S, Morucci M, Giuliani MS, De’ Medici L: Percutaneous treatment of varicocele. 13-year experience with the transbrachial approach. Radiol Med 2001;101:165–171.
- Jarrow JP: Effects of varicocele on male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:59–64.
- Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Van Arsdalen KN, Rutter CM, et al: Percutaneous varicocele embolization versus surgical ligation in the treatment of infertility: Changes in seminal parameters and pregnancy outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8:759–767.
Centini R, Sanchioni G, Candelari R, Antico E, et al: Percutaneous therapy of varicocele. Our experience in 1998–99. Technic and results. J Endocrinol Invest 2000;23(suppl):27.
World Health Organization: WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
World Health Organization: WHO Manual Laboratory for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, ed 4. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
- Balercia G, Arnaldi G, Fazioli F, Serresi M, Alleva R, Mancini A, Mosca F, Lamonica GR, Mantero F, Littarru G: Coenzyme Q10 levels in idiopathic and varicocele-associated asthenozoospermia. Andrologia 2002;34:107–111.
- MacLeod J, Gold RZ: The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoa counts in 1,000 men of known fertility and in 1,000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951;66:436–449.
- MacLeod J, Gold RZ: The male factor in fertility and infertility. IV. Semen quality and other factors in relation to the easy conception. Fertil Steril 1953;4:10–33.
- Baker HWG, Burger HG, De Krester DM, et al: Factors affecting the variability of semen analysis results in infertile men. Int J Androl 1981;4:609–622.
- Baker HWG, Kovacs GT: Spontaneous improvement in semen quality: Regression toward the mean. Int J Androl 1985;8:421–426.
- Baker HWG: Requirements for controlled therapeutic trials in male infertility. Clin Reprod Fertil 1986;4:13–25.
Baker HWG, Burger HG, De Krester DM, et al: Testicular vein ligation and fertility in men with varicocele. Br Med J 1985;291:1678–1680.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.