Abstract
Behavioral ecologists, well versed in addressing functional aspects of behavior, are acknowledging more and more the attention they need also to pay to mechanistic processes. One of these is the role of cognition. Song learning and imprinting are familiar examples of behaviors for which cognition plays an important role, but attention is now turning to other behaviors and a wider diversity of species. We focus here on work that investigates the nature of spatial learning and memory in the context of behaviors such as foraging and food storing. We also briefly explore the difficulties of studying cognition in the field. The common thread to all of this work is the value of using psychological techniques as tools for assessing learning and memory abilities in order to address questions of interest to behavioral ecologists.
References
1.
Barfield RJ (1971) Gonadotrophic hormone secretion in the female ring dove in response to visual and auditory stimulation in the mate. J Endocrinol 49:305–310.
2.
Barkley CL, Jacobs LF (1998) Visual environment and delay affect cache retrieval accuracy in a food-storing rodent. Anim Learn Behav 26:439–447.
3.
Barnes CA (1988) Aging and the physiology of spatial memory. Neurobiol Aging 9:563–568.
4.
Basil JA, Kamil AC, Balda RP, Fite KV (1996) Differences in hippocampal volume among food storing corvids. Brain Behav Evol 47:156–164.
5.
Bateson M, Kacelnik A (1998) Risk sensitive foraging: decision making in variable environments. In: Cognitive Ecology (Dukas R, ed), pp 297–341. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
6.
Berdoy M, Webster JP, Macdonald DW (2000) Fatal attraction in rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Proc R Soc (Lond) B 267:1591–1594.
7.
Biegler R, McGregor A, Krebs JR, Healy SD (2001) A larger hippocampus is associated with longer lasting spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6941–6944.
8.
Bingman VP, Yates RG (1992) Hippocampal lesions impair navigational learning in experienced homing pigeons. Behav Neurosci 106:229–232.
9.
Bolhuis JJ, Honey RC (1998) Imprinting, learning and development: from behavior to brain and back. Trends Neurosci 21(7):306–311.
10.
Bolhuis JJ, Macphail EM (2001) A critique of the neuroecology of learning and memory. Trends Cog Sci 5:426–433.
11.
Brodbeck DR (1994) Memory for spatial and local cues – a comparison of a storing and a nonstoring species. Anim Learn Behav 22:119–133.
12.
Brodbeck DR, Shettleworth SJ (1995) Matching location and color of a compound stimulus – comparison of a food-storing and a nonstoring bird species. J Exp Psych Anim Behav Proc 21:64–77.
13.
Brodin A (1993) Radio-ptilochronology – tracing radioactively labeled food in feathers. Ornis Scand 24:167–173.
14.
Brodin A, Ekman J (1994) Adaptive long-term hoarding. Nature 372:510.
15.
Brown GS, Gass CL (1993) Spatial association learning by hummingbirds. Anim Behav 46:487–497.
16.
Carr JAR, Wilkie DM (1998) Characterization of the strategy used by rats in an interval time-place learning task. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 24:151–162.
17.
Carr JAR, Wilkie DM (1997) Rats use an ordinal timer in a daily time-place learning task. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 23:232–247.
18.
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird Song. Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Clayton NS (2001) Hippocampal growth and maintenance depend on food-caching experience in juvenile mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Behav Neurosci 115:614–625.
20.
Clayton NS (1995) Development of memory and the hippocampus: comparison of food-storing and nonstoring birds on a one-trial associative memory task. J Neurosci 15:2796–2807.
21.
Clayton NS, Dickinson A (1998) Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395:272–274.
22.
Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994a) Hippocampal growth and attrition in birds affected by experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 91:7410–7414.
23.
Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994b) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and nonstoring birds. J Comp Physiol A 174:371–379.
24.
Collett TS, Zeil J (1998) Places and landmarks: an arthropod perspective. In: Spatial Representation in Animals (Healy S, ed), pp 18–53. Oxford: Oxford UP.
25.
Cowie RJ, Krebs JR, Sherry DF (1981) Food storing by marsh tits. Anim Behav 29:1252–1259.
26.
Cozzutti C, Vallortigara G (2001) Hemispheric memories for the content and position of food caches in the domestic chick. Behav Neurosci 115:305–313.
27.
Crystal JD, Miller BJ (2002) Simultaneous temporal and spatial processing. Anim Learn Behav 30:53–65.
28.
Cunningham JP, West SA (2001) Host selection in phytophagous insects: a new explanation for learning in adults. Oikos 95:537–543
29.
Cunningham JP, West SA, Wright DJ (1998) Learning in the nectar foraging behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. Ecol Entomol 23:363–369
30.
Cunningham JP, Zalucki MP, West SA (1999) Learning in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a new look at the behaviour and control of a polyphagous pest. Bull Entomol Res 89:201–207.
31.
Dwyer DM, Clayton NS (2002) A reply to the defenders of the faith. Trends Cog Sci 6:109–111.
32.
Flombaum JI, Santos LR, Hauser MD (2002) Neuroecology and psychological modularity. Trends Cog Sci 6:106–108.
33.
Galea LAM, Kavaliers M, Ossenkopp KP, Hampson E (1995) Gonadal hormone levels and spatial learning performance in the Morris Water Maze in male and female Meadow Voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Horm Behav 29:106–125.
34.
Galea LAM, Ossenkopp KP, Kavaliers M (1994) Performance (re-acquisition) of a water-maze task by adult meadow voles: effects of age of initial task acquisition and in utero environment (litter sex-ratio). Behav Brain Res 63:177–185.
35.
Garrison JSE, Gass CL (1999) Response of a traplining hummingbird to changes in nectar availability. Behav Ecol 10:714–725.
36.
Gass CL, Sutherland GD (1985) Specialization by territorial hummingbirds on experimentally enriched patches of flowers: energetic profitability and learning. Can J Zool 63:2125–2133.
37.
Gibbon J, Fairhurst S, Goldberg B (1997) Cooperation, conflict, and compromise between circadian and interval clocks. In: Time and Behavior: Psychological and Neurobehavioral Analyses (Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, eds), pp329–384. New York: Elsevier.
38.
Gill FB (1988) Trapline foraging by hermit hummingbirds: competition for an undefended renewable resource. Ecology 69:1933–1942.
39.
Girvan JR, Braithwaite VA (1998) Population differences in spatial learning in three-spined sticklebacks. Proc R Soc (Lond) B 265:913–918.
40.
Giurfa M, Eichmann B, Menzel R (1996) Symmetry perception in an insect. Nature 382:458–461.
41.
Godard R (1991) Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird. Nature 350:228–229.
42.
Good M, Macphail EM (1994) The avian hippocampus and short-term-memory for spatial and nonspatial information. Q J Exp Psych 47:293–317.
43.
Gouchie C, Kimura D (1991) The relationship between testosterone levels and cognitive ability patterns. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16:323–334.
44.
Griffin AS, Blumstein DT, Evans CS (2000) Training captive-breed or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conserv Biol 14:1317–1326.
45.
Guilford T, Nicol C, Rothschild M, Moore BP (1987) The biological roles of pyrazines – evidence for a warning odor function. Biol J Linn Soc 31:113–128.
46.
Hampton RR, Shettleworth SJ (1996a) Hippocampus and memory in a food-storing and in a nonstoring bird species. Behav Neurosci 110:946–964.
47.
Hampton RR, Shettleworth SJ (1996b) Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds. Behav Neurosci 110:831–835.
48.
Hampton RR, Healy SD, Shettleworth SJ, Kamil AC (2002) ‘Neuroecologists’ are not made of straw. Trends Cog Sci 6:6–7.
49.
Hampton RR, Sherry DF, Shettleworth SJ, Khurgel M, Ivy G (1995) Hippocampal volume and food-storing behavior are related in Parids. Brain Behav Evol 45:54–61.
50.
Healy SD (1995) Memory for objects and positions – delayed non-matching-to-sample in storing and nonstoring tits. Q J Exp Psych 48:179–191.
51.
Healy SD, Hurly TA (1995) Spatial memory in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus): A field test. Anim Learn Behav 23:63–68.
52.
Healy SD, Hurly TA (1998) Rufous hummingbirds’ (Selasphorus rufus) memory for flowers: patterns or actual spatial locations. J Exp Psych: Anim Behav Proc 24:396–404.
53.
Healy SD, Krebs JR (1992a) Food storing and the hippocampus in corvids: amount and size are correlated. Proc R Soc (Lond) B 248:241–245.
54.
Healy SD, Krebs JR (1992b) Delayed-matching-to-sample by marsh tits and great tits. Q J Exp Psych 45B: 33–47.
55.
Healy SD, Krebs JR (1992c) Comparing spatial memory in tits: recalling a single positive location. Anim Learn Behav 20:121–126.
56.
Healy SD, Krebs JR (1993) Development of hippocampal specialization in a food-storing bird. Behav Brain Res 53:127–131.
57.
Healy SD, Krebs JR (1996) Food storing and the hippocampus in Paridae. Brain Behav Evol 47:195–199.
58.
Healy SD, Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Development of hippocampal specialization in 2 species of tit (Parus spp). Behav Brain Res 61:23–28.
59.
Healy SD, Gwinner E, Krebs JR (1996) Hippocampal volume in migrating and non-migrating warblers: effects of age and experience. Behav Brain Res 81:61–68.
60.
Henderson J, Hurly TA, Healy SD (2001) Rufous hummingbirds’ memory for flower features. Anim Behav 61:98–106.
61.
Hilton SC, Krebs JR (1990) Spatial memory of 4 species of Parus – performance in an open-field analog of a radial maze. Q J Exp Psych B 42:345–368.
62.
Hitchcock CL, Sherry DF (1990) Long-term-memory for cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Anim Behav 40:701–712.
63.
Hixon MA, Carpenter FL, Paton DC (1983) Territory area, flower density, and time budgeting in hummingbirds: an experimental and theoretical analysis. Am Nat 122:366–391.
64.
Hurly TA (1996) Spatial memory in rufous hummingbirds: memory for rewarded and non-rewarded sites. Anim Behav 51:177–183.
65.
Hurly TA, Healy SD (2002) Spatial pattern learning by rufous hummingbirds. J Exp Psych: Anim Behav Proc 28:209–223.
66.
Hurly TA, Healy SD (1996) Memory for flowers in rufous hummingbirds – location or local visual cues. Anim Behav 51:1149–1157.
67.
Hurly TA, Oseen MD (1999) Context-dependent, risk sensitive foraging preferences in wild, rufous hummingbirds. Anim Behav 58:59–66.
68.
Jones CM, Braithwaite VA, Healy SD (2003) The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behav Neurosci 117:403–411.
69.
Juraska JM, Henderson C, Müller J (1984) Differential rearing experience, gender, and radial maze performance. Devel Psychobiol 17:209–215.
70.
Kacelnik A, Bateson M (1996) Risky theories – the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Am Zool 36:402–434.
71.
Kacelnik A, Bateson M (1997) Risk-sensitivity: crossroads for theories of decision-making. Trends Cog Sci 1:304–309.
72.
Krebs JR, Sherry DF, Healy SD, Perry VH, Vaccarino AL (1989) Hippocampal specialization of food-storing birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 86:1388–1392.
73.
Kullberg C, Houston DC, Metcalfe NB (2002) Impaired flight ability – a cost of reproduction in female blue tits. Behav Ecol 13:575–579.
74.
MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Ball GF (1999) Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci 22:432–436.
75.
MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Ball GF (2002) Revising hypotheses does not indicate a flawed approach – Reply to Bolhuis and Macphail. Trends Cog Sci 6:68–69.
76.
Macphail EM, Bolhuis JJ (2000) The evolution of intelligence: adaptive specializations versus general process. Biol Rev 76:341–364.
77.
Marples NM, Roper TJ (1996) Effects of color and smell on the response of naive chicks towards food and water. Anim Behav 51:1417–1424.
78.
McGregor A, Healy SD (1999) Spatial accuracy in food-storing and nonstoring birds. Anim Behav 58:727–734.
79.
Mendl M, Laughlin K, Hitchcock D (1997) Pigs in space: spatial memory and its susceptibility to interference. Anim Behav 54:1491–1508.
80.
Miller RS, Tamm S, Sutherland GD, Gass CL (1985) Cues for orientation in hummingbird foraging: color and position. Can J Zool 63:18–21.
81.
Norris K, Evans MR (2000) Ecological immunology: life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds. Behav Ecol 11:19–26.
82.
O’Keefe J, Nadel, L (1978) The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
83.
Pizzo MJ, Crystal JD (2002) The representation of time in time-place learning. Anim Learn Behav 30:387–393.
84.
Plenge M, Curio E, Witte K (2000) Sexual imprinting supports the evolution of novel male traits by transference of a preference for the color red. Behaviour 137:741–758.
85.
Reboreda JC, Clayton NS, Kacelnik A (1996) Species and sex differences in hippocampus size in parasitic and non-parasitic cowbirds. NeuroReport 7:505–508.
86.
Reynolds JD, Jones JC (1999) Female preference for preferred males is reversed under low oxygen conditions in the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps). Behav Ecol 10:149–154.
87.
Roof RL (1993) Neonatal exogenous testosterone modifies sex difference in radial arm and Morris water maze performance in prepubescent and adult rats. Behav Brain Res 53:1–10.
88.
Roof RL, Havens MD (1992) Testosterone improves maze performance and induces development of a male hippocampus in females. Brain Res 572:310–313.
89.
Rosenqvist G, Houde A (1997) Prior exposure to male phenotypes influences mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol 8:194–198.
90.
Rowe C (2002) Sound improves visual discrimination learning in avian predators. Proc R Soc (Lond) B 269:1353–1357.
91.
Sandlin EA (2000a) Foraging information affects the nature of competitive interactions. Oikos 91:18–28.
92.
Sandlin EA (2000b) Cue use affects resource subdivision among three coexisting hummingbird species. Behav Ecol 11:550–559.
93.
Schantz SL, Widholm JJ (2001) Cognitive effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in animals. Environ Health Perspect 109:1197–1206.
94.
Sherry DF (1984) Food storage by black-capped chickadees – memory for the location and contents of caches. Anim Behav 32:451–464.
95.
Sherry DF (1985) Food storage by birds and mammals. Adv Stud Behav 15:153–188.
96.
Sherry DF, Vaccarino AL (1989) Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees. Behav Neurosci 103:308–318.
97.
Sherry DF, Forbes MRL, Khurgel M, Ivy GO (1993) Females have a larger hippocampus than males in the brood-parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:7839–7843.
98.
Sherry DF, Jacobs LF, Gaulin SJC (1992) Spatial memory and adaptive specialization of the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 15:298–303.
99.
Sherry DF, Vaccarino AL, Buckenham K, Herz RS (1989) The hippocampal complex of food-storing birds. Brain Behav Evol 34:308–317.
100.
Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. New York NY: Oxford University Press.
101.
Slagsvold T, Hansen BT (2001) Sexual imprinting and the origin of obligate brood parasitism in birds. Am Nat 158:354–367.
102.
Speed MP, Alderson NJ, Hardman C, Ruxton GD (2000) Testing Mullerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds. Proc R Soc (Lond) B 267:725–731.
103.
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
104.
Stevens TA, Krebs JR (1986) Retrieval of stored seeds by marsh tits Parus palustris in the field. Ibis 128:513–525.
105.
Sutherland GD, Gass CL (1995) Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds. Anim Behav 50:1273–1286.
106.
ten Cate C (2000) How learning mechanisms might affect evolutionary processes. Trends Ecol Evol 15:3.
107.
ten Cate C, Vos DR (1999) Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: A reassessment. Adv Study Behav 28:1–31.
108.
Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods in ethology. Z Tierpsych 20:40–33.
109.
Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Borgia G (2000) Dynamic mate-searching tactic allows female satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus to reduce searching. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:251–256.
110.
Uy JAC, Patricelli GL,Borgia G (2001). Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Am Nat 158:530–542.
111.
Valone TJ (1992) Information for patch assessment: a field investigation with black-chinned hummingbirds. Behav Ecol 3:211–222.
112.
Van Duyse E, Pinxten R, Eens M (2002) Effects of testosterone on song, aggression, and nestling feeding behavior in male great tits, Parus major. Horm Behav 41:178–186.
113.
Vander Wall, SB (1990) Food Hoarding in Animals. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
114.
Volman SF, Grubb TCJ, Schuett KC (1997) Relative hippocampal volume in relation to food-storing behavior in four species of Woodpeckers. Brain Behav Evol 49:110–120.
115.
Weiss MR (2001) Vision and learning in some neglected pollinators: beetles, flies, moths, and butterflies. In: Cognitive Ecology of Pollination (Chittka L, Thomson JD, eds), pp171–190. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
116.
West EL, Laverty TM (1998) Effect of floral symmetry on flower choice and foraging behavior of bumble bees. Can J Zool 76:730–739.
117.
Williams CL, Meck WH (1991) The organizational effects of gonadal steroids on sexually dimorphic spatial ability. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16:155–176.
118.
Williams CL, Barnett AM, Meck WH (1990) Organizational effects of gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behav Neurosci 104:84–97.
119.
Witte K, Ryan MJ (1998) Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna. Behav Ecol 9:534–539.
120.
Wolf LL, Hainsworth FR (1990) Non-random foraging by hummingbirds: patterns of movement between Ipomopsis aggregata (Pursch) V. Grant inflorescences. Funct Ecol 4:149–157.
121.
Yoerg S (1991) Ecological frames of mind: the role of cognition in behavioral ecology. Q Rev Biol 66:287–301.
122.
Zimmerman PH, Pope SJ, Guilford T, Nicol CJ (in press) Navigational ability in the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus).
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
