Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Free Access

Changing Paradigms in Concepts on Dental Caries: Consequences for Oral Health Care

Fejerskov O.

Author affiliations

Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

Corresponding Author

Ole Fejerskov

Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences

University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard

DK–8000 Aarhus C (Denmark)

Tel. +45 33181950, Fax +45 33150626, E-Mail of@dg.dk

Related Articles for ""

Caries Res 2004;38:182–191

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Abstract

Kuhn proposed in his Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) that the theoretical framework of a science (paradigm) determines how each generation of researchers construes a causal sequence. Paradigm change is infrequent and revolutionary; thereafter previous knowledge and ideas become partially redundant. This paper discusses two paradigms central to cariology. The first concerns the most successful caries-preventive agent: fluoride. When it was thought that fluoride had to be present during tooth mineralisation to ‘improve’ the biological apatite and the ‘caries resistance’ of the teeth, systemic fluoride administration was necessary for maximum benefit. Caries reduction therefore had to be balanced against increasing dental fluorosis. The ‘caries resistance’ concept was shown to be erroneous 25 years ago, but the new paradigm is not yet fully adopted in public health dentistry, so we still await real breakthroughs in more effective use of fluorides for caries prevention. The second paradigm is that caries is a transmittable, infectious disease: even one caused by specific microorganisms. This paradigm would require caries prevention by vaccination, but there is evidence that caries is not a classical infectious disease. Rather it results from an ecological shift in the tooth-surface biofilm, leading to a mineral imbalance between plaque fluid and tooth and hence net loss of tooth mineral. Therefore, caries belongs to common ‘complex’ or ‘multifactorial’ diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, in which many genetic, environmental and behavioural risk factors interact. The paper emphasises how these paradigm changes raise new research questions which need to be addressed to make caries prevention and treatment more cost-effective.

© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Aasenden R, DePaola PF, Brudevold F: Effects of daily rinsing and ingestion of fluoride solutions upon dental caries and enamel fluoride. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:1705–1714.
  2. Andresen V: Über Mineralisation und Remineralisation des Zahnschmelzes. Dtsch Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1921;39:97–122.
  3. Aoba T, Fejerskov O: Dental fluorosis: Chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13:155–171.
  4. Arnold FA Jr: The use of fluoride compounds for the prevention of dental caries. Int Dent J 1957;7:54–72.
  5. Arnold FA Jr, Dean HT, Jay P, Knutson JW: Effects of fluoridated water supplies on dental caries prevalence: 10th year of the Grants Rapids-Muskegon Study. Public Health Rep 1956;71:652–658.
  6. Arnold FA Jr, Dean HT, Knutson JW: Effect of fluoridated public water supplies on dental caries incidence: Results of the seventh year of study at Grand Rapids and Muskegon, Mich. Public Health Rep 1953;68:141–148.
  7. Arnold FA Jr, Likins RC, Russell AL, Scott DB: Fifteenth year of the Grand Rapids fluoridation study. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;65:780–785.
  8. Backer Dirks O: The benefits of water fluoridation. Caries Res 1974;8:2–15.
  9. Backer Dirks O, Houwink B, Kwant GW: The results of 6 1/2 years of artificial drinking water in The Netherlands: The Tiel-Culemborg experiment. Arch Oral Biol 1961;5:284–300.
  10. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Küseler A: Approximal plaque pH following topical applications of standard buffers in vivo. Caries Res 1994;28:116–122.
  11. Bjarnason SS, Finnbogason SY, Holbrook P, Köhler B: Caries experience in Icelandic 12-year-old urban children 1984 and 1991. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;21:194–197.
  12. Bowden GHW: Which bacteria are cariogenic in humans?; in Johnson NW (ed): Risk Markers for Oral Diseases: Dental Caries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp 266–286.
  13. Brown WE, Gregory TM, Chow LC: Effects of fluoride on enamel solubility and cariostasis. Caries Res 1977;11:118–141.
    External Resources
  14. Brudevold F, Gardner DE, Smith F: The distribution of fluoride in human enamel. J Dent Res 1956;35:420–429.
  15. Brudevold F, McCann HG, Grøn P: Caries resistance as related to the chemistry of the enamel; in Wolstenholme GEW, O’Connor M (eds): Caries Resistant Teeth. Ciba Found Symp. London, Churchill, 1965, pp 121–148.
  16. Brudevold F, McCann HG, Nilsson R, Richardson B, Coklica V: The chemistry of caries inhibition: Problems and challenges in topical treatments. J Dent Res 1967;46:37–45.
  17. Brunelle JA, Carlos JP: Recent trends in dental caries in US children and the effect of water fluoridation. J Dent Res 1990;69(special issue):723–727.
  18. ten Cate JM, Duijsters PPE: Influence of fluoride in solution on tooth demineralisation. I. Chemical data. Caries Res 1983;17:193–199.
  19. Darwin C: On the Origin of Species. New York, 1889.
  20. Davies D: Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat Rev 2003;2:114–122.
  21. Dean HT: Epidemiological studies in the United States; in Moulton R (ed): Dental Caries and Fluorine. Washington, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1946, pp 5–31.
  22. DePaola PF, Brudevold F, Aasenden R, Moreno EC, Englander H, Bakhos Y, Bookstein F, Warram J: A pilot study of the relationship between caries experience and surface enamel fluoride in man. Arch Oral Biol 1975;20:859–864.
  23. Elliott JC: Recent progress in the chemistry, crystal chemistry and structure of the apatite. Calcif Tissue Res 1969;3:293–307.
  24. Fejerskov O, Baelum V: Changes in prevalence and incidence of the major oral diseases; in Guggenheim B, Shapiro H (eds): Oral Biology at the Turn of the Century: Truth, Misconcepts and Challenges. Basel, Karger, 1998, pp 1–11.
  25. Fejerskov O, Johnson NW, Silverstone LM: The ultrastructure of fluorosed human dental enamel. Scand J Dent Res 1974;82:357–372.
  26. Fejerskov O, Larsen MJ, Richards A, Baelum V: Dental tissue effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res 1994;8:15–31.
  27. Fejerskov O, Manji F: Risk assessment in dental caries; in Bader JD (ed): Risk Assessment in Dentistry. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Dental Ecology, 1990, pp 214–217.
  28. Fejerskov O, Nyvad B: Is dental caries an infectious disease? Diagnostic and treatment consequences for the practitioner; in Schou L (ed): Nordic Dentistry 2003 Yearbook. Copenhagen, Quintessence Publishing, 2003, pp 141–151.
  29. Fejerskov O, Scheie AA, Manji F: The effect of sucrose on plaque pH in the primary and permanent dentition of caries-inactive and -active Kenyan children. J Dent Res 1992;71:25–31.
  30. Fejerskov O, Silverstone LM, Melsen B, Møller IJ: Histological features of fluorosed human dental enamel. Caries Res 1975;9:190–210.
  31. Fejerskov O, Thylstrup A, Larsen MJ: Clinical and structural features and possible pathogenic mechanisms of dental fluorosis. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:510–534.
  32. Fejerskov O, Thylstrup A, Larsen MJ: Rational use of fluoride in caries prevention: A concept based on possible cariostatic mechanisms. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:241–249.
  33. Fitzgerald RJ, Keyes PH: Demonstration of the etiological role of streptococci in experimental caries in the hamster. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;61:9–19.
  34. Frazier PD, Little MF, Casciani FS: X-ray diffraction analysis of human enamel containing different amounts of fluoride. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12:35–42.
  35. Granath L, Cleaton-Jones P, Fatti LP, Grossman ES: Prevalence of dental caries in 4- to 5-year-old children partly explained by presence of salivary mutans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:66–70.
  36. Groeneveld A: Longitudinal study of prevalence of enamel lesions in a fluoridated and non-fluoridated area. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985;13:159–163.
  37. Groeneveld A, Backer Dirks O: Fluoridation of drinking water, past, present and future; in Ekstrand J, Fejerskov O, Silverstone LM: Fluoride in Dentistry. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1988, pp 229–251.
  38. Hallsworth AS, Robinson C, Weatherell JA: The chemical pattern of carious attack. Caries Res 1971;5:16–17.
  39. Hand JS, Hunt RJ, Beck JD: Incidence of coronal and root caries in an older adult population. J Public Health Dent 1988;48:14–19.
  40. Hausen H: Caries prediction – state of the art. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:87–96.
  41. van Houte J: Bacterial specificity in the etiology of dental caries. Int Dent J 1980;30:305–326.
  42. Isaac S, Brudevold F, Smith FA, Gardner DE: The relation of fluoride in the drinking water to the distribution of fluoride in enamel. J Dent Res 1958;37:318–325.
  43. Kay MI, Young RA, Posner AS: Crystal structure of hydroxy-apatite. Nature 1964;204:1050–1052.
  44. Keyes PH: The infectious and transmissible nature of experimental dental caries: Findings and implications. Arch Oral Biol 1960;1:304–320.
  45. Kiberstis P, Roberts L: It’s not just the genes. Science 2002;296:685.
  46. Kidd EAM, Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, Bruun C: The influence of fluoride in surface enamel and degree of dental fluorosis on caries development in vitro. Caries Res 1980;14:196–202.
  47. Koulourides T, Feagin FF, Pigman W: Remineralisation of dental enamel by saliva in vitro. Ann NY Acad Sci 1965;131:751–757.
  48. Kuhn TS: The Structure of Scientific Revolution (1962), ed 2. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1970.
  49. Kutnerian H, Kuyper AC: The influence of fluoride on the solubility of bone salt. J Biol Chem 1957;233:760–763.
  50. Küseler A, Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Heidmann J: Accuracy and precision in vitro of Beetrode® microelectrodes used for intraoral pH measurements. Caries Res 1993;27:183–190.
  51. Larsen MJ: Enamel Solubility Caries and Erosions; thesis Royal Dental College, Aarhus, 1975.
  52. Larsen MJ, von der Fehr FR, Birkeland JM: Effect of fluoride on the saturation of an acetate buffer with respect to hydroxyapatite. Arch Oral Biol 1976;21:723–728.
  53. Larsen MJ, Kirkegaard E, Poulsen S, Fejerskov O: Enamel fluoride, dental fluorosis and dental caries among immigrants to and permanent residents of five Danish fluoride areas. Caries Res 1986;20:349–355.
  54. Last JM: A Dictionary of Epidemiology, ed 3. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
  55. Laurence JR, Neu TR: Confocal laser scanning microscopy for analysis of microbial biofilms. Methods Enzymol 1999;310:131–144.
  56. Loesche WJ: Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 1986;50:2118–2135.
  57. Luan W-M, Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Chen X: Ten-year incidence of dental caries in adult and elderly Chinese. Caries Res 2000;34:205–213.
  58. Manley RS, Harrington DP: Solution rate of tooth enamel in acetate buffer. J Dent Res 1959;38:910–919.
  59. Margolis HC, Duchworth JH, Moreno EC: Composition of pooled resting plaque fluid from caries-free and caries susceptible individuals. J Dent Res 1988;67:1468–1475.
  60. Marsh PD: Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res 1994;8:263–271.
  61. Marsh PD, Martin M: Oral Microbiology, ed 3. London, Chapman & Hall, 1992.
  62. Matee MIN, Mikx FHM, De Soet JS, Maselle SY, De Graaff J, Van Palenstein Helderman WH: Mutans streptococci in caries-active and caries-free infants in Tanzania. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1993;8:322–324.
  63. Mellberg JR: Enamel fluoride and its anticaries effects. J Prevent Dent 1977;4:8–20.
  64. Newsely JW, McConnell D, Armstrong WD: The nature of carbonate contents in tooth mineral. Experientia 1963;19:620–621.
  65. Nyvad B, Fejerskov O: Structure of dental plaque and the plaque-enamel interface in human experimental caries. Caries Res 1989;23:151–158.
  66. Nyvad B, Kilian M: Comparison of the initial streptococcal microflora on dental enamel in caries-active and in caries-inactive individuals. Caries Res 1990;24:267–272.
  67. Øgaard B, Rølla, Ruben J, Dijkman T, Arends J: Microradiographic study of deminerlization of shark enamel in a human caries model. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:209–211.
  68. van Palenstein Heldermann WH, Mikx FHM, van’t Hof MA, Truin GJ, Kalsbeek H: The value of salivary bacterial counts as a supplement to past caries experience as caries predictor in children. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:312–315.
  69. Planck M: Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers (translated by Gaynor F). New York, 1940.
  70. Poulsen S, Larsen MJ: Dental caries in relation to fluoride content of enamel in the primary dentition. Caries Res 1975;9:59–65.
  71. Richards A, Fejerskov O, Baelum V: Enamel fluoride in relation to severity of human dental fluorosis. Adv Dent Res 1989;3:147–153.
  72. Richards A, Kragstrup J, Josephsen K, Fejerskov O: Dental fluorosis developed in post-secretory enamel. J Dent Res 1986;65:1406–1409.
  73. Richards A, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O, Thylstrup A: Fluoride content of buccal surface enamel and its relation to dental caries in children. Arch Oral Biol 1977;22:425–428.
  74. Richards A, Likimani S, Baelum V, Fejerskov O: Fluoride concentrations in unerupted fluorotic human enamel. Caries Res 1992;26:328–332.
  75. Rodriques FE: Quantitative incidence of Lactobacillus acidophilus in the oral cavity as a presumptive index of susceptibility to dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1931;18:2118–2135.
  76. Schamschula RG, Agus H, Charlton G, Duppenthaler JL, Un P: Associations between fluoride concentration in successive layers of human enamel and individual dental caries experience. Arch Oral Biol 1979;24:847–852.
  77. Shern RJ, Driscoll WS, Korts DC: Enamel biopsy results of children receiving fluoride tablets. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;95:310–314.
  78. Smith CE: Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998;9:128–161.
  79. Spector PC, Curzon MEJ: Surface enamel fluoride and strontium in relation to caries prevalence in man. Caries Res 1979;113:227–230.
  80. Stephan RM: Changes in hydrogen-ion concentration on tooth surfaces and in carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1940;27:718–723.
  81. Sullivan Å, Borgström MK, Granath L, Nilsson G: Number of mutans streptococci or lactobacilli in a total dental plaque sample does not explain the variation in caries better than the numbers in stimulated whole saliva. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:1559–163.
  82. Sullivan Å, Granath L, Widenheim J: Correlation between child caries incidence and S. mutans/lactobacilli in saliva after correction for confounding factors. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:240–244.
  83. Tanzer JM: On changing the cariogenic chemistry of coronal plaque. J Dent Res 1989;68(special issue):1576–1587.
  84. Thylstrup A: Clinical Evaluation of Fluoride Derived Enamel Changes: A Critical Review; thesis Royal Dental College, Aarhus, 1979.
  85. Volker JF: Effect of fluoride in solubility of enamel and dentin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1939;42:725–727.
  86. Weatherell JA, Robinson C, Hallsworth AS: The concept of enamel resistance: A critical review; in Guggenheim B (ed): Cariology Today. Basel, Karger, 1984, pp 223–230.
  87. Young RA: Biological apatite vs. hydroxyapatite at the atomic level. Clin Orthop 1975;113:249–262.
  88. Zipkin I, Posner AS, Eanes ED: The effect of F on x-ray diffraction pattern of apatite of human bone. Biochim Biophys Acta 1962;59:255–258.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: May 21, 2004
Issue release date: May – June

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.