Laboratory/Clinical Translational Research
Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Esophagus
Yachida S.a · Nakanishi Y.c · Shimoda T.a · Nimura S.a · Igaki H.b · Tachimori Y.b · Kato H.b
Clinicopathologic Study of 18 Cases
aClinical Laboratory Division and bEsophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital and cPathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Objectives: Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagus is an uncommon form of esophageal cancer. Despite isolated case reports on this tumor type, no large clinicopathologic series appears to have been studied at a single institution. Methods: At our institution, 20 cases of ASC were diagnosed pathologically between 1970 and 2001 (20/2,056 total esophageal cancers; 1.0%). Excluding 2 patients who received preoperative radiation therapy, 18 were selected for review of their clinicopathologic features, including survival time, in comparison with those of patients with conventional squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs; n = 850) and adenocarcinomas (ACs; n = 40) of the esophagus. Results: The location and macroscopic type of the ASCs were similar to those of the SCCs. ASC tumors were significantly smaller than SCC (p = 0.004) and AC (p = 0.012) tumors, and the depth of invasion of ASCs was significantly less than that of SCCs (p = 0.028). Lymphatic permeation and blood vessel invasion were seen in 14 (77.8%) and 7 (38.9%) of the 18 patients with ASCs, respectively, and intraepithelial carcinoma contiguous to the main lesion was evident in 10 cases (56.6%). The cumulative postoperative survival rates of patients with ASC at 3, 5 and 10 years were 71.5, 63.6 and 47.7%, respectively, the outcome being significantly better than for patients with either SCC (p = 0.027) or AC (p = 0.013). Conclusion: In the esophagus, ASCs have better prognosis than conventional SCCs or ACs, probably due to their smaller size and lower stage.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.