Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Comparison of Tilt and Decentration between Phacoemulsification and Phacotrabeculectomy

Mutlu F.M. · Bayer A. · Erduman C. · Bayraktar M.Z.

Author affiliations

Department of Ophthalmology, Gülhane Military Medical Academy and Medical School, Ankara, Turkey

Related Articles for ""

Ophthalmologica 2005;219:26–29

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: July 08, 2004
Accepted: September 18, 2004
Published online: January 06, 2005
Issue release date: January – February

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/OPH

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the extent of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt and decentration values after combined surgery in patients with cataract and glaucoma. Materials and Methods: A total of 106 cataractous eyes undergoing IOL implantation were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 42 eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy surgery for cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and group 2 comprised 64 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification surgery for senile cataract. The length of IOL decentration and the angle of IOL tilt were quantitated by using Purkinje reflections and photographic documentation. Results: The differences regarding both the IOL tilt (2.84 ± 0.37; 2.97 ± 0.37, respectively) and decentration (0.39 ± 0.27; 0.49 ± 0.35, respectively) was insignificant (p > 0.05) between groups. Conclusion: There is no increased effect of phacotrabeculectomy on tilt and decentration of IOLs in eyes with POAG when compared with eyes which underwent phacoemulsification surgery.

© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Kozaki J, Tanihara H, Yasuda A, Nagata M: Tilt and decentration of the implanted posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:592–595.
  2. Guyton DL, Uozato H, Wisnicki J: Rapid determination of intraocular lens tilt and decentration through the undilated pupil. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1259–1264.
  3. Assia EI, Legler UF, Merrill C, Hicklin JC, Castaneda VE, Hoggatt JP, Wasserman D, Apple DJ: Clinicopathologic study of the effect of radial tear and loop fixation on IOL decentration. Ophthalmology 1993;100:153–158.
  4. Caballero A, Losado M, Lopez JM, Gallego L, Sulla O, Lopez C: Decentration of intraocular lenses implanted after intercapsular cataract extraction (envelope technique). J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:330–334.
  5. Hansen SO, Tetz MR, Solomon KD, Broup MD, Brems RN, O’Morchoe DJ, Bouhaddou O, Apple DJ: Decentration of flexible intraocular lenses in a series of 222 postmortem eyes. Ophthalmology 1988;95:344–349.
  6. Akkın C, Özler SA, Menteş L: Tilt and decentration of bag-fixated intraocular lenses: A comparative study between capsulorhexis and envelope techniques. Doc Ophthalmol 1994;87:199–209.
  7. Kimura W, Kimura T, Sawada T, Taguchi H, Hirokane C, Ohte A, Hitani H: Postoperative decentration of three piece silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg1996;22:1277–1280.
  8. Yang CH, Hung PT: Intraocular lens position and anterior chamber angle changes after cataract extraction in eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1109–1113.
  9. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F: Intraocular lens tilt and decentration after implantation in eyes with glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1515–1520.
  10. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F: Anterior capsule contraction and intraocular lens dislocation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1429–1432.
  11. Shammas HJ: Anterior intraocular lens dislocation after combined cataract extraction trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:358–361.
  12. Mutlu FM, Bilge AH, Altınsoy HI, Yumuşak E: The role of capsulotomy and intraocular lens type on tilt and decentration of polymethyl methacrylate and foldable acrylic lenses. Ophthalmologica 1998;212:359–363.
  13. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F: Comparison of decentration and tilt between one piece and three piece polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:419–422.
  14. Davison JA: Capsule contraction syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:582–589.
  15. Cochener B, Jacq PL, Colin J: Capsule contraction after continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis: Poly(methyl methacrylate) versus silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1362–1369.
  16. Hayashi K, Harada M, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F: Decentration and tilt of polymethyl methacrylate, silicone, and acrylic soft intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 1997;104:793–798.
  17. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Haumann GO: A histopathologic study of zonular instability in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:730–743.
  18. Lowe RF: Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma: Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1970;54:161–169.
  19. Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Toscano A: Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998;105:2091–2098.
  20. Uozato H, Okada Y, Hirai H, Saishin M: What is the tolerable limits of the IOL tilt and decentration? Jpn Rev Clin Ophthalmol 1988;82:2308–2311.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: July 08, 2004
Accepted: September 18, 2004
Published online: January 06, 2005
Issue release date: January – February

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/OPH


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.