Quality of Life during Pollen Season in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis with or without AsthmaLaforest L.a · Bousquet J.b · Pietri G.c · Sazonov Kocevar V.d · Yin D.d · Pacheco Y.e · van Ganse E.a
aPharmacoepidemiology Unit, EA3091 CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, bDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, CHU, Montpellier, France; cRutgers University, Piscataway, N.J., dMerck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J., USA; eDepartment ofRespiratory Medicine, EA3091 CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Objectives: We studied the evolution of generic and rhinoconjunctivitis-specific quality of life (QOL) during pollen season in patients with isolated seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and those with asthma and concomitant SAR (AS+SAR). Generic QOL between groups was also compared at pollen peak. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in Southern France in 2002. Outpatients aged 18–60, regularly visiting respiratory physicians for SAR, were recruited before the grass (grass cohort) or ragweed pollination period (ragweed cohort). Before the pollination period (baseline) and at peak pollination, patients completed French versions of the Mini Rhinoconjuctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-RQLQ) and physical and mental Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores (PCS and MCS) to determine rhinoconjunctivitis and generic QOL. Results: Totals of 83 and 52 patients were included in the SAR and AS+SAR groups, respectively (mean age = 35.4; 56.4% females). Mini-RQLQ scores indicated slightly worse QOL in the A+SAR group at inclusion, which significantly deteriorated at the time of pollen peak, both in the SAR (p < 0.0001) and AS+SAR groups (p = 0.003). In univariate analysis, significantly higher SF-12 PCS (meaning better QOL) were observed at pollen peak in the SAR compared with the AS+SAR group (p = 0.0008), while the difference for SF-12 MCS was more limited (p = 0.05). Results were confirmed in multivariable analyses adjusting for gender, allergy medication use at pollen peak, cohort of inclusion (grass/ragweed) and comorbid conditions. Conclusions: Significant deterioration in rhinoconjunctivitis-specific QOL was observed through the pollination period in patients with SAR and AS+SAR. At pollen peak, AS+SAR patients experienced significantly worse physical functioning than patients with SAR alone.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.