Intravenous TPA for Very Old Stroke PatientsChen C.-I.a, b · Iguchi Y.a, c · Grotta J.C.a · Garami Z.a, d · Uchino K.a, e · Shaltoni H.a · Alexandrov A.V.f
aStroke Treatment Team, The University of Texas, Houston, Tex., USA; bDepartment of Neurology, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital managed by Taipei Medical University, Tapei, Taiwan; cStroke Center, Department of Neurology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan; dDepartment of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; eDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa., fBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Ariz., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Although thrombolysis in patients with advanced age is considered more risky, some may benefit from TPA treatment. We studied safety and recanalization/recovery in patients older than 80 years treated with TPA and compared them with younger stroke patients. Methods: We studied patients treated with intravenous TPA and divided them into younger (<80 years) and older (≧80 years) groups for comparison. Diagnostic transcranial Doppler was completed before bolus, and patients were consequently monitored for up to 2 h when feasible. Clinical data included NIH Stroke Scale score, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and discharge disposition. Results: We studied 127 younger (mean 63 years, range 31–79) and 56 older patients (mean 84 years, range 80–93). Median baseline NIH Stroke Scale score was higher in the older group (18 vs. 14 points, NS). Occlusion locations, onset to needle time (median 130 vs. 120 min) as well as improvement at 24 h (median 5 vs. 4 points) were similar in both groups. Transcranial Doppler monitoring showed similar partial or complete recanalization rates (66 vs. 66%), onset to recanalization time (median 160 vs. 158 min) and reocclusion rates (26 vs. 25%). Symptomatic and fatal ICH was not higher in the older group (7.1 and 3.5% vs. 6.3 and 3.9%, NS). There was higher mortality among older patients (20 vs. 11%, NS). At discharge, 23% of older patients went home, 41% underwent rehabilitation and 16% were transferred to skilled nursing facilities, compared with 31, 43 and 15% respectively, in the younger group. Conclusion: After intravenous TPA treatment, patients over 80 years of age have similar recanalization, short-term improvement and symptomatic ICH rates compared with younger patients. However, older patients tend to have higher in-hospital mortality.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.