Blood Purification

Original Paper

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Hemodialysis

A Simplified Procedure Using Duocart Biofiltration

Ridel C.a · Mercadal L.a · Béné B.c · Hamani A.a · Deray G.a · Petitclerc T.a, b

Author affiliations

Departments of aNephrology and bBiophysics, Hôpital de la Pitié, Paris, and cHospal R&D Int., Lyon, France

Related Articles for ""

Blood Purif 2005;23:473–480

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: December 19, 2005
Issue release date: December 2005

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0253-5068 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9735 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BPU

Abstract

Background: Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis is promising, but its clinical implementation is routinely cumbersome because a continuous adjustment of calcium infusion at the dialyzer outlet is needed. Duocart biofiltration (DCB) is a new hemodialysis method using a calcium and magnesium-free dialysate containing only sodium chloride and bicarbonate combined with the infusion into the venous line of a solution containing the ionic complement (K, Ca, Mg) and glucose. Since the dialysate is calcium- and magnesium-free and infusion rate of the solution containing calcium is automatically determined by the dialysis delivery system according to the on-line measured value of ionic dialysance, DCB seems a technique especially suitable for citrate anticoagulation procedure. Methods: Thirty DCB sessions were performed in 10 patients with increased risk of bleeding. A commercially available mixture of trisodium citrate, citric acid and glucose was infused into the arterial line at a rate equal to 3% of dialyzer blood flow. The ionic complement (K: 48 mM, Ca: 42 mM, Mg: 14 mM, glucose: 110 mM) was infused at a rate equal to 1/24 ionic dialysance value automatically determined each 15 min by the dialysis monitor. DCB sessions were compared to 21 conventional bicarbonate hemodialysis (BHD) sessions with low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation. Results: Whole blood activated clotting time (WBACT) measured in the venous line (before infusion of ionic complement) was 200% of the WBACT value in the arterial line. Clotting and citrate-related adverse events were not observed. Postdialysis compression time of the arteriovenous access is significantly (p < 0.001) shorter after DCB sessions (3.9 ± 1.1 min) compared with BHD sessions (8.7 ± 4.6 min). Conclusion: Citrate anticoagulation during Duocart biofiltration is effective, safe and suitable for routine use because calcium infusion rate is automatically adjusted without the need of monitoring degree of anticoagulation and level of ionized calcium.

© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Morita Y, Johnson R, Dorn R, Hall D: Regional anticoagulation during hemodialysis using citrate. Am J Med 1961;242:32–42.
  2. Pinnick RV, Wiegmann TB, Diederich DA: Regional citrate anticoagulation for hemodialysis in the patient at high risk for bleeding. N Engl J Med 1983;308:258–266.
  3. Flanigan MJ, von Brecht J, Freeman RM, Lim VS: Reducing the hemorrhagic complications of hemodialysis: a controlled comparison of low-dose heparin and citrate anticoagulation. Am J Kidney Dis 1987;9:147–153.
  4. Van der Meulen J, Janssen MJ, Langendijk PN, et al: Citrate anticoagulation and dialysate with reduced buffer content in chronic hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 1992;37:36–41.
  5. Ward DM: The approach to anticoagulation in patients treated with extracorporeal therapy in the intensive care unit. Adv Renal Replace Ther 1997;4:160–173.
  6. Flanigan MJ, Pillsbury L, Sadewasser G, Lim VS: Regional hemodialysis anticoagulation: hypertonic tri-sodium citrate or anticoagulant citrate dextrose-A. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;27:519–524.
  7. Apsner R, Buchmayer H, Lang T, et al: Simplified citrate anticoagulation for high-flux hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:979–987.
  8. Evenepoel P, Maes B, Vanwalleghem J, et al: Regional citrate anticoagulation for hemodialysis using a conventional calcium-containing dialysate. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:315–323.
  9. Kelleher SP, Schulman G: Severe metabolic alkalosis complicating regional citrate hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1987;9:235–236.
  10. Silverstein FJ, Oster JR, Perez GO, et al: Metabolic alkalosis induced by regional citrate hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans 1989;35:22–25.
  11. Meier-Kriesche HU, Finkel KW, Gitomer JJ, DuBose TD: Unexpected severe hypocalcemia during continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;33:E8.
    External Resources
  12. Charney DI, Salmond R: Cardiac arrest after hypertonic citrate anticoagulation for chronic hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans 1990;36:M217–M219.
  13. Mercadal L, Petitclerc T, Bene B, et al: Duocart biofiltration: a new method of hemodialysis. ASAIO J 1999;45:151–156.
  14. Janssen MJ, Deegens JK, Kapinga TH, et al: Citrate compared to low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 1996;49:806–813.
  15. Lindsay RM, Bene B, Goux N, et al: Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:565–574.
  16. Mercadal L, Tezenas du Montcel S, Jaudon MC, et al: Ionic dialysance vs urea clearance in the absence of cardiopulmonary recirculation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:106–111.
  17. Petitclerc T: Recent developments in conductivity monitoring of haemodialysis session. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2607–2613.
  18. Saltissi D, Morgan C, Westhuyzen J, Healy H: Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin sodium) and standard unfractionated heparin for haemodialysis anticoagulation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2698–2703.
  19. Calatzis A, Toepfer M, Schramm W, et al: Citrate anticoagulation for extracorporeal circuits: effects on whole blood coagulation activation and clot formation. Nephron 2001;89:233–236.
  20. McIntyre CW, Lambie SH, Taal MW, Fluck RJ: Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:559–563.
  21. Movilli E, Camerini C, Zein H, et al: A prospective comparison of bicarbonate dialysis, hemodiafiltration and acetate-free biofiltration in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;27:541–547.
  22. Todeschini M, Macconi D, Fernandez NG, et al: Effect of acetate-free biofiltration and bicarbonate hemodialysis on neutrophil activation. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:783–793.
  23. Renaux JL, Thomas M, Crost T, et al: Activation of the kallicrein-kinin system in hemodialysis: role of membrane electronegativity, blood dilution and pH. Kidney Int 1999;55:1097–1103.
  24. Keller F, Seemann J, Preuschof L, Offermann G: Risk factors of system clotting in heparin-free haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1990;5:802–807.
  25. Swartz RD, Port FK: Preventing hemorrhage in high-risk hemodialysis: regional versus low-dose heparin. Kidney Int 1979;16:513–518.
  26. Maher JF, Lapierre L, Schreiner GE, et al: Regional heparinization for hemodialysis: technical and clinical experiences. N Engl J Med 1963;268:451–456.
    External Resources
  27. Zusman RM, Rubin RH, Cato AE, et al: Hemodialysis using prostacyclin instead of heparin as the sole antithrombotic agent. N Engl J Med 1981;304:934–939.
  28. Vanholder RC, Camez AA, Veys NM, et al: Recombinant hirudin: a specific thrombin inhibiting anticoagulant for hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1994;45:1754–1759.
  29. Vienken J, Diamantoglou M, Hahn C, et al: Considerations on developmental aspects of biocompatible dialysis membranes. Artif Organs 1995;19:398–406.
  30. Charney DI, Salmond R: Cardiac arrest after hypertonic citrate anticoagulation for chronic hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans 1990;12:375–382.
  31. Bohler J, Schollmeyer P, Dressel B, et al: Reduction of granulocyte activation during hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation: dissociation of complement activation and neutropenia from neutrophil degranulation. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:234–241.
  32. Dhondt A, Vanholder R, Tielemans C, et al: Effect of regional citrate anticoagulation on leukopenia, complement activation and expression of leukocyte surface molecules during hemodialysis with unmodified cellulose membrane. Nephron 2000;85:334–342.
  33. Hofbauer R, Moser D, Frass M, et al: Effect of anticoagulation on blood membrane interactions during hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1999;56:1578–1583.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: December 19, 2005
Issue release date: December 2005

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0253-5068 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9735 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BPU


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP