Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Original Paper
Does Body Mass Index Predict Overweight in Native Asian Indians? A Study from a North Indian PopulationBhansali A.a · Nagaprasad G.b · Agarwal A.c · Dutta P.a · Bhadada S.aDepartments of aEndocrinology, bDermatology and cPulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: October 30, 2004
Accepted: May 04, 2005
Published online: January 13, 2006
Issue release date: January 2006
Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 4
ISSN: 0250-6807 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9697 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ANM
Abstract
Aims: Body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a gold standard for defining overweight and obesity, and in western populations it has correlated with percentage body fat (%BF). However, data in native Asian Indians regarding BMI and %BF is conflicting and questions have been raised to redefine the BMI cut-off values in these subjects. Subjects and Methods: 150 healthy volunteers (79 men and 71 women aged 18–78 and 23–75 years respectively) were recruited for the study. Clinical examination was performed to exclude any systemic disease. Anthropometric measurements were done and %BF was calculated from skinfold thickness. Results: The BMI for men was 24.96 kg/m2 (±3.85) and for women was 25.75 kg/m2 (±4.39).%BF calculated by skinfold thickness was 21.94% (±5.92) in men and 35.15% (±5.77) in women. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a higher sensitivity (92%) and higher negative predictive value (95%) for the conventional cut-off value of the BMI (25 kg/m2) in identifying subjects with overweight with %BF of more than 25% in men. However, in females a BMI of 23.9 kg/m2 had a sensitivity of 84% and negative predictive value of 62% thereby decreasing the misclassification by 13% with %BF of more than 30% as compared to conventional BMI cut-off of >25 kg/m2. A comparison of BF data amongst Caucasians, Blacks and migrant ethnic Asians revealed inconspicuous differences in men. Conclusion: Native North Indian men had comparative BMI and %BF as that of their western counterparts.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- McKeigue PM, Shah B, Marmott MG: Relationship of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians. Lancet 1991;338:842–847.
- Reaven GM: Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988;37:1595–1607.
- Dudeja V, Misra A, Pandey RM, Devina G, Kumar G, Vikram NK: BMI does not accurately predict overweight in Asian Indians in northern India. Br J Nutr 2001;86:105–112.
-
Yap MP, Schmidt G, van Stavern WA, Deurenberg P: The paradox of low body mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese Malays and Indians in Singapore. Int J Obes 2001;24:1011–1017.
External Resources
- Banerji MA, Faridi N, Atluri R, Chaiken RL, Lebovitz HE: Body composition, visceral fat, leptin and insulin resistance in Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:137–144.
- Ramchandra A, Snehalatha C, Dharam RD, Vishwanathan M: Prevalence of glucose intolerance in Asian Indians. Urban rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1348–1355.
- Swinburn BA, Craig PL, Daniel R, Dent DPD, Strauss BJG: Body composition differences between Polynesians and Caucasians assessed by bioelectrical impedance. Int J Obes 1996;20:889–894.
- Wang J, Thornton JC, Russel M, Burastero S, Heymsfield S, Pierson RN: Asians have lower body mass index but higher percent body fat than do whites: comparisons of anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;60:23–28.
- Misra A: Body composition and the metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians – a saga of multiple adversities. Natl Med J India 2003;16:3–7.
- Misra A, Vikram NK: Insulin resistance syndrome (metabolic syndrome) and obesity in Asian Indians: evidence and implications. Nutrition 2004;20:482–491.
-
World Health Organisation: Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser No 854. Geneva, WHO, 1995.
-
World Health Organisation: Obesity: prevention and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on Obesity. Geneva, WHO, 1998.
-
Pollock ML, Wilmore JH: Exercise in Health and Disease. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1990.
-
Hortobagyi T, Israel RG, O’Brien KF: Sensitivity and specificity of the Quetelet index to assess obesity in men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994;48:769–775.
- Dureberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC: Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific predictive formulae. Br J Nutr 1991;65:105–114.
-
Cohn SH, Abesamis C, Zanzi I, Aloia JA, Yasumura S, Ellis KJ: Body elemental composition: comparison between Black and White adults. Am J Physiol 1977;232:E419–E422.
- Gasperino JA, Wang J, Pierson RN, Heymsfield SB: Age-related changes in musculoskeletal mass between Black and White women. Metabolism 1995;44:30–34.
-
Yap MP, Yian TB, Kai CS, Deurenberg P, Stavern WAV: Manifestations of cardiovascular risk factors at low levels of body mass index and waist hip ratio in Singaporean Chinese. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 1999;8:177–183.
External Resources
- Ko GTC, Chan JCN, Cockram CS, Woo J: Prediction of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia or albuminuria using simple anthropometric indexes in Hong Kong Chinese. Int J Obes 1999;23:1136–1142.
- Durnin JVGA, Womersely J: Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skin fold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 22 years. Br J Nutr 1974;32:77–97.
- Kuriyan R, Petracchi C, Ferro-Luzzi A, Shetty PS, Kurpadn AV: Validation of expedient methods for measuring body composition in Indian adults. Ind J Med Res 1998;107:37–45.
-
Han TS, Van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean MEJ: Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factor: prevalence study in a random sample. Br Med J 1995;311:1401–1405.
External Resources
- Willet WC, Dietz WHG, Colditz GA: Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med 1999;341:427–434.
- Luke A, Arvizzu DR, Rotimi C, Prewitt E, Forrester T Wilks R, Ogunbiyi OJ, Schoeller DA, McGee D, Cooper RS: Relation between body mass index and body fat in Black population samples from Nigeria, Jamaica and the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:620–628.
- Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB: How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex and ethnic groups? Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:228–239.
- Wellens RI, Roche AF, Khamis HJ, Jackson AS, Polock ML, Siervogel RM: Relationship between the body mass index and body composition. Obes Res 1996;4:35–44.
Article / Publication Details
Received: October 30, 2004
Accepted: May 04, 2005
Published online: January 13, 2006
Issue release date: January 2006
Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 4
ISSN: 0250-6807 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9697 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ANM
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission