Validity of Parent-Reported Height and Weight for Defining Obesity among Asthmatic and Nonasthmatic SchoolchildrenGarcia-Marcos L.a · Valverde-Molina J.c · Sanchez-Solis M.a, b · Soriano-Pérez M.J.c · Baeza-Alcaraz A.c · Martinez-Torres A.b · Perez-Fernandez V.b · Guillen-Perez J.J.d
aInstitute of Respiratory Health, University of Murcia and bPediatric Pulmonology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Children’s Hospital Virgen Arrixaca, Murcia, cDepartment of Pediatrics, Los Arcos Hospital, Santiago de la Ribera, and dLocal Health Authority, Cartagena, Spain
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: The relationship between parent-reported and measured height and weight is not well established in schoolchildren. This relationship has never been studied in asthmatic children. The objective of this study is to test the validity of the parent-reported weight and height for defining obesity by BMI and to know whether the perception of this height and weight changes when the child suffers from asthma. Methods: All classes of children of the target ages of 6–8 years (n = 1,672, participation rate 70.2%) of all schools in four municipalities of Murcia (Spain) were included. Parents were asked about their children’s weight and height using a questionnaire which included the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) core questions on asthma. Parents were not aware that their children were going to be weighed and measured within 1 week’s time. Measurements were performed using a rigid stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm and a scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. Results: The bias (reported minus real) was, respectively, for nonasthmatics and asthmatics: weight +0.42 kg (95% CI +0.24; +0.59 kg) versus +0.97 kg (+0.50; +1.44 kg), height +2.37 cm (+2.06; +2.68 cm) versus +2.87 cm (+1.87; +3.87 cm); BMI –0.39 kg/m2 (–0.52; –0.23 kg/m2) versus –0.23 kg/m2 (–0.58; +0.13 kg/m2). Diagnostic accuracy of obesity calculated from reported measurements was, respectively, for nonasthmatics and asthmatics: sensitivity 78.0 versus 77.8%, specificity 96.2 versus 94.5%, positive predictive value 77.2 versus 73.7% and negative predictive value 96.4 versus 91.7%. Conclusions: Reported weights and heights had large biases, comparable between parents of both asthmatic and those of nonasthmatic children. However, this information could be reasonably valid for classifying children as obese or nonobese in large epidemiological studies.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Ellwood P, Asher MI, Beasley R, Clayton TO, Stewart AW: The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): phase three rationale and methods. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005;9:10–16.
- Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M: Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;101:28–34.
- Goodman E, Hinden BR, Khandelwal S: Accuracy of teen and parental reports of obesity and body mass index. Pediatrics 2000;106:52–58.
- Strauss RS: Comparison of measured and self-reported weight and height in a cross-sectional sample of young adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:904–908.
- Giacchi M, Mattei R, Rossi S: Correction of the self-reported BMI in a teenage population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:673–677.
- Davis H, Gergen PJ: The weights and heights of Mexican-American adolescents: the accuracy of self-reports. Am J Public Health 1994;84:459–462.
- Fortenberry JD: Reliability of adolescents’ reports of height and weight. J Adolesc Health 1992;13:114–117.
- Crawley HF, Portides G: Self-reported versus measured height, weight and body mass index amongst 16–17 year old British teenagers. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19:579–584.
- Galan I, Gandarillas A, Febrel C, Meseguer C: Validación del peso y la talla autodescritos en una población adolescente. Gac Sanit 2001;15:490–497.
- Davis H, Gergen PJ: Mexican-American mothers’ reports of the weights and heights of children 6 months through 11 years old. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:512–516.
- Sekine M, Yamagami T, Hamanishi S, Kagamimori S: Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of childhood obesity from height and weight values reported by parents: results of the Toyama Birth Cohort study. J Epidemiol 2002;12:9–13.
- Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320:1240–1243.
- Bland JM, Altman DG: Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1085–1087.
- Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307–310.
Rothman K, Greenland S: Precision and validity of studies; in Rothman K, Greenland S (eds): Modern Epidemiology, ed 2. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005, pp 115–134.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.