Human Heredity

Original Paper

What Is the Significance of a Significant TDT?

Ewens W.J.a · Spielman R.S.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Biology and bDepartment of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., USA

Related Articles for ""

Hum Hered 2005;60:206–210

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 22, 2005
Accepted: November 07, 2005
Published online: February 03, 2006
Issue release date: February 2006

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HHE

Abstract

This note summarizes the development of the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT). The initial purpose of the TDT procedure was to test for linkage between a genetic marker and a disease susceptibility locus when an association had been found between the two. An association between disease and marker had sometimes been taken to imply linkage. An association could, however, be due to population stratification even in the absence of linkage. In contrast, the outcome of the TDT is not affected by such stratification. Furthermore, when linkage is not in doubt, the TDT can, in some cases, also provide a test of association between marker and disease. We discuss these various matters in this paper.

© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ: Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: The insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:506–516.
  2. Nerup J, Platz P, Andersen OO, Christy M, Lyngsoe J, Poulsen JE, Ryder LP, Nielsen LS, Thomsen M, Svejgaard A: HL-A antigens and diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1974;2:864–866.
  3. Cudworth AG, Woodrow JC: Evidence for HL-A-linked genes in ‘juvenile’ diabetes mellitus. Br Med J 1975;3:133–135.
  4. Cox NJ, Baker L, Spielman RS: Insulin-gene sharing in sib pairs with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: No evidence for linkage. Am J Hum Genet 1988;42:167–172.
  5. Cox NJ, Spielman RS: The insulin gene and susceptibility to IDDM. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:65–69.
  6. Spielman RS, Baur MP, Clerget-Darpoux F: Genetic analysis of IDDM: Summary of GAW5-IDDM results. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:43–58.
  7. McGinnis RE, Spielman RS, Ewens WJ: Linkage between the insulin gene (IG) region and susceptibility to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet Suppl 1991;49:A476.
    External Resources
  8. Rubinstein P, Walker M, Carpenter C, Carrier C, Krassner J, Falk C, Ginsburg F: Genetics of HLA disease associations: the use of the haplotype relative risk (HRR) and the ‘haplo-delta’ (Dh) estimates in juvenile diabetes from three racial groups. Hum Immunol 1981;3:384.
    External Resources
  9. Falk CT, Rubinstein P: Haplotype relative risks: an easy, reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 1987;51:227–233.
  10. Thomson G, Robinson WP, Kuhner MK, Joe S: HLA, insulin gene, and Gm associations with IDDM. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:155–160.
  11. Ott J: Statistical properties of the haplotype relative risk. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:127–130.
  12. Terwilliger JD, Ott J: A haplotype-based ‘haplotype relative risk’ approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 1992;42:337–346.
  13. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS: The transmission/disequilibrium test: History, subdivision and admixture. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:455–464.
  14. Martin ER, Monks SA, Warren LL, Kaplan NL: A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: The pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61:1179–1188.
  15. Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Silverberg MS, Lindblad K, Steinhart H, Cohen Z, Delmonte T, Kocher K, Miller K, Guschwan S, Kulbokas EJ, O’Leary S, Winchester E, Dewar K, Green T, Stone V, Chow C, Cohen A, Langelier D, Lapointe G, Gaudet D, Faith J, Branco N, Bull SB, McLeod RS, Griffiths AM, Bitton A, Greenberg GR, Lander ES, Siminovitch KA, Hudson TJ: Genetic variation in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster confers susceptibility to Crohn disease. Nature Genetics 2001;29:223–228.
  16. Emison ES, McCallion AS, Kashuk CS, Bush RT, Grice E, Lin S, Portnoy ME, Cutler DJ, Green ED, Chakravarti A: A common sex-dependent mutation in a RET enhancer underlies Hirschsprung disease risk. Nature 2005;434:857–863.
  17. Lin S, Chakravarti A, Cutler DJ: Exhaustive allelic transmission disequilibrium tests as a new approach to genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1181–1188.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 22, 2005
Accepted: November 07, 2005
Published online: February 03, 2006
Issue release date: February 2006

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HHE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP