Original Research Article
Determinants of the Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients as Assessed by the Japanese Version of the Quality of Life – Alzheimer’s Disease ScaleMatsui T.a · Nakaaki S.a · Murata Y.a · Sato J.b · Shinagawa Y.a · Tatsumi H.c · Furukawa T.A.a
aDepartment of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, bYagoto Hospital and cNagoya Second Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Background: Although QOL is an important indicator to assess multiple facets of life, the QOL of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) subjects with impaired cognitive ability due to dementia has not yet been fully investigated. In this study, we developed the Japanese version of the Quality of Life – Alzheimer’s disease (QOL-AD) scale by means of back-translation, and ascertained its reliability and validity for evaluating the quality of life in AD subjects. We also hypothesized that the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms may determine the characteristics and determinants of both the patients’ and the caregivers’ responses to the patients’ QOL questionnaire. Methods: We administered the QOL-AD questionnaire to subjects with mild or moderate AD (n = 140). The test-retest reliability was evaluated by the same interviewer after a month’s interval. Data from the following tests were also collected to ascertain the validity of the questionnaire: Short Memory Questionnaire (SMQ), Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI), Hyogo Activities of Daily Living Scale (HADL) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: The Japanese version of the QOL-AD questionnaire demonstrated good internal reliability for both the patients’ (Cronbach’s α = 0.84) and the caregivers’ responses (Cronbach’s α = 0.82) and good test-retest reliability for both the patients’ (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84) and caregivers’ reports (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91). The concordance between the patients’ self-report and the caregivers’ observation was moderate (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.60). The score for the ‘mood factor’ (apathy, depression/dysphoria) in NPI predicted the overall QOL score as determined from both the patients’ and the caregivers’ responses for subjects with mild (MMSE≧21, n = 88) and moderate (MMSE<21, n = 52) AD. The score for the ‘psychosis factor’ (delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, agitation, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor activity) in NPI predicted the total QOL score as determined by the patients and the caregivers among subjects with moderate AD only. Conclusions: As hypothesized, the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms may be an important predictor of both the patients’ and caregivers’ responses to the patients’ QOL questionnaire. QOL-AD appears to be a promising measure of the QOL of subjects with mild to moderate AD in Japan.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.